User talk:Jolianomans1505
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Jolianomans1505, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
- and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}}
on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Rosiestep (talk) 10:12, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Japan–Libya relations moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Japan–Libya relations. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Wikipedia is not a reliable source. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Annh07 (talk) 15:04, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Japan–Libya relations has a new comment
[edit]Japan–Libya relations moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Japan–Libya relations, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources that are not from Wikipedia itself. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kazamzam (talk) 00:47, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
November 2023
[edit]Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Civil union, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 08:39, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Libya–Mauritania relations moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Libya–Mauritania relations. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Paul Vaurie (talk) 20:12, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
[edit] Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Foreign relations of Australia into Australia–Libya relations. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:46, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
December 2023
[edit] Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Foreign relations of Libya into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Please do not keep doing this, it breaks Wikipedia policies and doesn't improve the encyclopedia. BuySomeApples (talk) 12:21, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
January 2024
[edit]Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tripoli, Libya, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Skitash (talk) 12:23, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Arab Maghreb Union shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Skitash (talk) 10:16, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. it's your last warning Egeymi (talk) 12:22, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Libya–Mauritania relations moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Libya–Mauritania relations. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 08:27, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Libya–Mauritania relations for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libya–Mauritania relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Star Mississippi 14:42, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Sirje Karis
[edit]Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sirje Karis, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:42, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Jolianomans1505. Thank you for your work on Libya–Thailand relations. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start. Needs more independent references and content developed from them. Happy editing!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 20:24, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Jolianomans1505. Thank you for your work on Japan–Libya relations. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 18:32, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Jolianomans1505. Thank you for your work on Libya–Romania relations. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 21:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Jolianomans1505. Thank you for your work on Libya–Ukraine relations. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 15:20, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Jolianomans1505. Thank you for your work on Australia–Libya relations. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 03:16, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Jolianomans1505. Thank you for your work on Jordan–Libya relations. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 13:43, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Jolianomans1505. Thank you for your work on Libya–Syria relations. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 13:44, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Jolianomans1505. Thank you for your work on Iraq–Libya relations. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start. Could use more sources and material developed from the, Happy editing!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 13:46, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Jolianomans1505. Thank you for your work on Libya–United Arab Emirates relations. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 13:49, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Jolianomans1505. Thank you for your work on Libya–Portugal relations. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 13:55, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Jolianomans1505. Thank you for your work on Libya–Suriname relations. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work. Other ones like this have a map which is nice. Happy editing
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 13:56, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Jolianomans1505,
Please stop moving this article around. You moved it to three different page titles. Keep it at this title and if you want to move it again, for some reason, start a talk page discussion. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 06:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Costa Rica–Libya relations
[edit]Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Costa Rica–Libya relations, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:49, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Non-attributed translations
[edit]Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from vi:Ngô Phương Ly to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. For example:
Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.
It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. C F A 💬 18:53, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Jolianomans1505
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Goldsztajn, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Costa Rica–Libya relations, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to contest the deletion:
- Edit the page
- Remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
- Click the button.
If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Goldsztajn}}
. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Goldsztajn (talk) 03:39, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Costa Rica–Libya relations
[edit]Hello Jolianomans1505, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Costa Rica–Libya relations, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Costa Rica–Libya relations.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Goldsztajn}}
. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Goldsztajn (talk) 23:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, I would like to say that the article shouldn’t removed because I think it’s good to have an articles like it on Wikipedia so it’s not important to make a voting about this and thank you Jolianomans1505 (talk) 18:23, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Costa Rica–Libya relations
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Costa Rica–Libya relations requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Costa Rica–Libya relations. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 23:18, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, Jolianomans1505,
- You should have participated in the AFD discussion if you wanted this article to be Kept. Any recreation will be deleted via speedy deletion, CSD G4. Liz Read! Talk! 23:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Costa Rica–Libya relations
[edit]Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Costa Rica–Libya relations, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:17, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Costa Rica–Libya relations
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Costa Rica–Libya relations requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Costa Rica–Libya relations. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris talk! 08:32, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, Jolianomans1505,
- If you want to restore this article, you must create a draft and get it approved at by an AFC reviewer. Your persistent attempts to recreate this article in main space will soon lead to you losing your editing privileges. You have to accept that it was deleted in an AFD discussion and start from scratch in Draft space. Liz Read! Talk! 21:35, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)