User talk:Joer.Priority.Sports

This is Joer.Priority.Sports's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qcne were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Joer.Priority.Sports/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 15:17, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Joer.Priority.Sports! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! qcne (talk) 15:17, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I would love to get advice as to how I can publish the article i have created. I have cited all of my sources and I am wondering what I could change to get this article published. Joer.Priority.Sports (talk) 19:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Joer.Priority.Sports, unfortunately you haven't cited properly. Wikipedia requires that biographic articles use in-line citations with footnotes.

Go to WP:INTREFVE to learn how to do this on the Visual Editor. It will automatically generate a Ref List for you.

This is mandatory for biographic articles. qcne (talk) 19:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bobby Cohn were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:REFB to understand how to use inline citations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Joer.Priority.Sports/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bobby Cohn (talk) 18:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See msg on talk page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Joer.Priority.Sports/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 19:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello Joer.Priority.Sports. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Ryan Richman, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Joer.Priority.Sports. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Joer.Priority.Sports|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. .

Joer.Priority.Sports, you mentioned here that you are an intern writing about your boss. This means that, whether your internship is paid or not, you are considered to be a paid editor, and you do have to make the disclosure described above. bonadea contributions talk 16:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you are mistaken due to the fact I am not bieng directly or indirectly compensated for my work and I am posting a non biased biography of Ryan Richman because my boss told me to. What should my next steps be if I would like to publish this article Joer.Priority.Sports (talk) 16:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, as I said you do count as a paid editor. Even if your internship is not paid. --bonadea contributions talk 18:01, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another thing: the Articles for Creation templates with the previous decline notices and reviewer comments must not be removed until a reviewer accepts the draft. Please do not remove them again. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 16:36, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]