User talk:JinSHOCK81

Welcome!

Hello, JinSHOCK81, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Arkavansham, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Fram (talk) 12:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Arkavansham

The article Arkavansham has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unverifiable, no sources at all for "Arkavansham".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 12:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arkavansham for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arkavansham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arkavansham until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 19:31, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Arkavansh

Hello JinSHOCK81,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Arkavansh for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Spasage (talk) 15:32, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Violations

hello JinSHOCK81, I have noticed you are issuing random warnings of cyber crime and all in your edit summaries.. perhaps you dont know that this kind of behavior can lead to your account being blocked or restricted... so kindly dont do it again or I or someone else will report this to admins ...thanks -- Adamstraw99 (talk) 11:30, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Arkavansham listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Arkavansham. Since you had some involvement with the Arkavansham redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Fram (talk) 08:55, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Khaga, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. utcursch | talk 15:07, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]