User talk:Jidhin George

Welcome!

Hello, Jidhin George! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 05:33, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

August 2014

Hello, I'm Param Mudgal. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Taliparamba, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Param Mudgal (talk) 14:10, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Benefits? JGeorge 04:08, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Therthally

Located in Kannur district, famous for its landscape and rich heritage. Jidhin George 02:30, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fenix (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fenix and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Anupmehra -Let's talk! 19:30, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Jidhin George, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 19:30, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Jidhin_George reported by User:ViperSnake151 (Result: ). Thank you. ViperSnake151 Talk 04:05, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:30, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

If there's one thing I've noticed about you, it's your persistence.

Everything on Wikipedia must be cited to a reliable source. The source in the article does not mention anything about a lack of status LED. ViperSnake151 Talk 15:02, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mainstream availability of information does not discount it from needing to have a source attached to it. It must be properly cited. ViperSnake151 Talk 15:36, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kerala Vision. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 03:26, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pete Lau-CEO of OnePlus.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pete Lau-CEO of OnePlus.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Fenix

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Fenix, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 09:54, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Ruiz

Change Andy Ruiz to Mexican American please. He is Mexican Havs2010 (talk) 11:10, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Please refrain from putting "Added content" and "Fixed typo" in edit summaries everytime you edit. You should explain why you changed it. Thanks. VictorTorres2002 (talk) 12:52, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Shanling moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Shanling, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheImaCow (talk) 05:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fenix Light

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fenix Light, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TheImaCow (talk) 05:11, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage-Move

Yeah, why did you moved my userpage from User:TheImaCow to User:TheImaLazy? Because i nominated your page for deletion? If you dont want the page deleted, then write your reason to Talk:Fenix Light , but u cant move my page! TheImaCow (talk) 05:23, 25 April 2020 (UTC) You cannot nominate for deletion![reply]

Hey, CAN u stop it?? TheImaCow (talk) 05:32, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You started it!!

I started what? TheImaCow (talk) 05:36, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You don't know?

no TheImaCow (talk) 05:37, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

good

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 05:48, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jidhin George (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had valid sources for the edits I made then, and now I am seeing errors in the results. I would like to edit them too. It's been 4 years, and I am requesting that you unblock me.Jidhin George (talk) 08:02, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Dupilcate request placed in a section header. Edits only need to be placed in the larger edit window, not the smaller section header/edit summary window. You can avoid creating section headers entirely by clicking "edit" and not "add topic" or "new section" to open the edit window. 331dot (talk) 08:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jidhin George (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had valid sources for the edits I made then, and now I am seeing errors in the results. I would like to edit them too. It's been 4 years, and I am requesting that you unblock me.Jidhin George (talk) 08:02, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please specifically describe what was wrong with your edits in a new request, to demonstrate your understanding. 331dot (talk) 08:40, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jidhin George (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had valid sources for the edits I made then, and now I am seeing errors in the results. I would like to edit them too. It's been 4 years, and I am requesting that you unblock me. I think I have repeatedly reverted my edits as soon as the user corrected itJidhin George (talk) 09:05, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request (actually, you had two simultaneous open unblock requests) is clearly a deliberate waste of our time. You already tried this request and it was declined. Yamla (talk) 10:48, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jidhin George (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had valid sources for the edits I made then, and now I am seeing errors in the results. I would like to edit them too. It's been 4 years, and I am requesting that you unblock me.Jidhin George (talk) 13:37, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Why are you repeating a request that's already been declined? I'm wondering if there are some competence issues here. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 13:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jidhin George (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had valid sources for the edits I made then, and now I am seeing errors in the results. I would like to edit them too. It's been 4 years, and I am requesting that you unblock me. Alright, now I know you are a bunch of heavy headed people here thinking as top of the world, can you do me a favour, could you delete my account for me?Jidhin George (talk) 14:57, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; user no longer wishes to be unblocked. Do not make another request like this. You will not get another warning. Yamla (talk) 17:16, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am done with you pathetic people. Jidhin George (talk) 14:57, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(spammed unblock requests removed) --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 18:09, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Accounts cannot be deleted since doing so would lead to legal issues. If you no longer wish to contribute to Wikipedia, you can simply abandom the account. However, spamming the unblock template will not help and it is likely that an administrator will revoke talk page access. QwertyForest (talk) 18:00, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.