User talk:Jhawkinstx

April 2019

Hello, I'm MelanieN. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MelanieN (talk) 15:07, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You must stop inserting your own opinion into articles, as you did at List of federal political scandals in the United States and Teapot Dome scandal. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and one of its core principals is neutrality. We reflect what has been said by reliable sources, and we cite the sources. If you have an opinion about what the article should say, post it at the article's talk page, such as Talk:Teapot Dome scandal. -- MelanieN (talk) 15:11, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

so your opinions on the materiality of including this entire section are more valid than my insertion of material facts about the bias sources cited here..... got it.

would suggest dropping entire politically motivated section [comparisons]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 22:13, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]