User talk:Jaselives

Review articles

We try to use review article per WP:MEDRS. This http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8113455 is a primary research study of 7 people.--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:12, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shari Olefson.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 22:36, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shari Olefson (attorney).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! APerson241 (talk) 02:21, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shari Olefson (attorney)

(In reference to the message you left on my talk page)

The reason I declined that page was indeed lack of notability. The Wikipedia policy on notability says that a proposed article should have independent sources that are not by the subject. All of the sources cited in your proposed article were written by the subject of the article. While it is important to have primary sources, secondary sources are also very important. Furthermore, regarding the citation you left on my user page, YouTube channel pages are not considered reliable sources due to their transience. APerson241 (talk) 16:10, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Shari Olefson (attorney), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

APerson241 (talk) 17:24, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shari Olefson (attorney)

The article Shari Olefson (attorney) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The only thing I can't find that is actually a third party source is an article about how the subject sued a former employer for unfair dismissal based on gender. While that is interesting, it doesn't make her notable. The article is also rather self-promotional.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:16, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shari Olefson concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shari Olefson, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:04, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]