User talk:Jacurani

Speedy deletion nomination of Ramsar Parsian Hotel

Hello Jacurani,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ramsar Parsian Hotel for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 12:19, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. - LouisAragon (talk) 15:20, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Including, but not limited to: Mazandaran Province, Ilkhanate, Wildlife of Iran, Hasan ibn Zayd, History of Iran, Ziyarid dynasty, Zand dynasty, Sasanian art, Fereydun. Clearl WP:AGENDA-loaded editorial pattern circling around the promotion of a city named Amol. - LouisAragon (talk) 15:23, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. im not, my work don't promotion of a city named Amol. Existing resources and no problem. i edit very much, great article, and received encouragement. Your talk is baseless. I edit very much city and country article as: Dubai, Oman, Kuwait, Budapest .... Jacurani (talk) 12:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ramsar Parsian Hotel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ramsar Parsian Hotel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramsar Parsian Hotel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pinkbeast (talk) 16:30, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reason for deletion. Jacurani (talk) 17:11, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:03, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your behavior, attacking me. Not available in law and human morality. your admin for avoid insults, no for leader to insult. your your is so funny. your behavior is biased of destroyer as Pinkbeast and other.... Jacurani (talk) 21:43, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for continuing disruption and personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 22:59, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jacurani (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So funny ruling... Absurd and unfounded adjudication. Free content and valid letter in wikipedia by administration been violated. Supporting offenders is clear. Jacurani (talk) 02:16, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 02:33, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jacurani (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I read guide to appealing blocks M.r Jpgordon, but access limitations for me, Neither law and justice. Jacurani (talk) 02:39, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What limitations? You have access to all relevant information, and can respond to the block reason, as specified by Jpgordon, here. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:51, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Didi?

Hale didi chi shod? Behet goftam. --HistoryofIran (talk) 00:05, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bale didam. tabei hast.. manam ke goftam inja dictatorie afrad ba zor hakeme na manba va madrak. modir be shekl ashkar az motekhalefin hemayat mikone va pasokh nemideh. khandeh dare. shoma migi man begam chashm harkari deleton mikhad bokonin!!. kojay ghanon wikipedia inro gofte?? link bedid. shoma ke mashaallah ba inha khob hashro nashr darid, dobare berid ar page hamin do karbari ke khastar hazf hotel ramsar shodan bebinid in 6 nafar be joz admin be man payam dadan hamashon bahaman, engar khoda mamoriat dade faghat inha bayad virashgar maghalat marbote bashan. beharhal shoma khob mifahmi man chi migam, khah ghabol konid khah nakonid. Jacurani (talk) 02:11, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jacurani. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]