User talk:JG4236

This is JG4236's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris Ballinger (October 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hermera34 was:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mohamed_Lahyani&diff=prev&oldid=1009132886

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Clearly does not meet the notability requirements. Please review WP:BIO for further information on establishing notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chris Ballinger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hermera34 (talk) 22:32, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! JG4236, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hermera34 (talk) 22:32, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello, I'm C.Fred. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Joe Walsh (Illinois politician) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —C.Fred (talk) 00:07, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Curt Schilling. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Do not add speculation about future elections. —C.Fred (talk) 01:05, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JG4236, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! -- Amanda (aka DQ) 13:14, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to add that, looking at the subpages you've created, you would be better off at a website like Ancestry.com. Wikipedia is not a web hosting service, and the majority of the pages you created are clearly not intended to improve the encyclopedia, and they also expose personal information that the subjects may not want on a public website. Please save the information you need then add the code {{db-u1}} to the pages so that they will be removed. You may also reply here and I will delete them. —DoRD (talk) 13:29, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, yes please, delete them! I've been trying to do this for so long and can't figure out how to do it, thank you!--JG4236 (talk) 04:57, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, I'm A guy saved by Jesus. Your recent edit to the page Aroldis Chapman appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 17:32, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Wilson Ramos, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 17:35, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ian Desmond. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 21:01, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Atkinson

It would be nice if you're going to bury someone to at least cite sources. Please see the talk page where I can find 'mentions' of his death, but nobody points to anything citeable! Shenme (talk) 02:04, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chris Ballinger

Hello, JG4236. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Chris Ballinger".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 23:26, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages

You're probably not aware but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. The article about the person you added to December 30 did not have any source that I could add to this page to back up your addition so this change has been reverted. Please do not restore it without providing a direct reliable source. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 03:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Andre Iguodala. —Bagumba (talk) 15:46, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Citation needed

Hey there, in this diff, you added an entry (twice) without any citations. Could you find a source to add? See WP:ENDORSERFC. Bobbychan193 (talk) 23:03, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at October 2. Toddst1 (talk) 02:44, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Presidential campaign announcements in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:45, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at November 1. Toddst1 (talk) 05:30, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced personal information or related content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Marc D'Amelio, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Toddst1 (talk) 05:33, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of The Office (American TV series) characters into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 18:45, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Marc D'Amelio.jpg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:Marc D'Amelio.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.thehour.com/news/article/D-Amelio-blames-Democrats-after-drunken-driving-13267277.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Blablubbs ^{(talk • contribs)} 01:44, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Devon Abner

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Devon Abner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://herbalskiey.weebly.com/blog/the-office-cast, https://homeoftvnostalgia.wixsite.com/00stvnostalgia/the-office-an-american-workplace, and https://weheyy.merrychristmas2020.info/2922-article.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Modussiccandi (talk) 18:42, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Devon Abner moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Devon Abner, has no sources or citations and cannot remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved it to draft space (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can work on it with minimal disruption. When you feel that it meets our notability and neutrality requirements, and is thus ready for mainspace, please submit it using the Articles for Creation template on the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:37, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hello, JG4236! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time.

Me-123567-Me (talk) 21:50, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alerts: AP and BLP

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

FYI. ―Mandruss ☎ 04:16, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:RichardRobbins.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:RichardRobbins.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://twitter.com/rar624. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:58, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello, I'm Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2018 Florida gubernatorial election, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck (talk) 17:34, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2024 United States presidential election. Sundayclose (talk) 04:50, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Kirkman (character) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tom Kirkman (character), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 01:03, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 09:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for persistent addition of unsourced content, but also, as early as a month ago, for plainly disruptive editing. Please review the multiple warnings and notices above this space. Continuing with this behaviour is unsustainable. Thanks and good luck. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 10:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Appealing my Block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JG4236 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is absolutely outrageous! The reason I removed information on Joint Statistical Meeting was because the event was cancelled due to COVID-19 and nobody removed it. While I do apologize for inserting SOME unsourced content (and I promise to not do that) but I feel that the information I inserted was useful information like when I added that Bianca Andreescu was back from injury hiatus on 2021 Australian Open - Women's Singles and I think that I should not be blocked for that. Finally, I am very frustrated that we are being penalized for being creative on our own subpages that people won't find because they are under our own username. I thought those subpages and our Sandbox are for us to be creative by playing around with Wikipedia features that I find fun to use. Of course, it would be ridiculous for me to be creative on real pages but I would never and have never done that. Thank you. JG4236 (talk) 17:43, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I will agree with you that the first edit you mention was probably good, although the place to bring up your reason for removing it was in the edit summary. But as for a lot of your other edits ... all this information can very easily be sourced, and most editors would have done so, but you never showed any interest. (This edit also shows that you aren't familiar with MOS:N'T, but unfamiliarity with the MOS is not by itself a blockable offense).

However ... I am very troubled by a serious contradiction between what you assert in your request and what your record reveals. You say, regarding your humorous subpages (themselves sort of troubling, as anyone willing to put in that level of work should really be putting it towards actual content, and is additionally clearly demonstrating the ability, if not perhaps the inclination, to put sources in articles supporting the facts they add) that "it would be ridiculous for me to be creative on real pages but I would never and have never done that."

Then what, exactly, were you doing here? It sure looks to me like you linked one of your play pages from a real article.

The general immaturity level of your request, as well as the many final warnings you have received over the past year that have not been followed through with blocks (commented on at the AN/I), suggest to me that if you do serve out this block and return to editing as you have been, the next block should be an indef NOTHERE block because you will have demonstrated better than anyone else what behavior that category of blocks exists for.

"Mend your ways, young man, mend your ways" — Daniel Case (talk) 05:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have admitted that I should have sourced the 2021 Australian Open - Women's Singles edit, and for that I apologize. I also apologize for linking one of my own pages to a real page WHICH WAS AN ACCIDENT! But this block is seriously unnecessary. If you don't feel inclined to completely lift the block, then please consider reducing it to 2-4 days.--JG4236 (talk) 15:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:JG4236/dadabadada

Hello, JG4236. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:JG4236/dadabadada, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 07:24, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I WOULD LIKE IT DELETED!--JG4236 (talk) 16:56, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:JG4236/lilguss

Hello, JG4236. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:JG4236/lilguss, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 07:25, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I WOULD LIKE IT DELETED!--JG4236 (talk) 16:56, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Martin Garbus

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:55, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Block again, same thing

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Appealing my Block... again

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JG4236 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Here we go again. The reason you see unsourced material on Martin Garbus's page is that I KNOW HIM! How am I supposed to source something that I know personally. Am I supposed to source the cell of my brain that knew about what I wrote? C'mon. With all due respect, Wikipedia is becoming tyrannical, blocking people left and right. I could be do something far worse like deleting entire pages or completely vandalizing them.JG4236 (talk) 02:01, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 05:11, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You may want to review Wikipedia:No_original_research#Primary,_secondary_and_tertiary_sources, especially Do not add unsourced material from your personal experience, because that would make Wikipedia a primary source of that material. Use extra caution when handling primary sources about living people; see WP:Biographies of living persons § Avoid misuse of primary sources, which is policy.

You were blocked for this edit, which you made after I gave you a final warning for the Martin Garbus edit. You've been warned numerous times about this previously and blocked for it once. The next block will be much longer or indefinite. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 02:27, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) JG, I'm surprised the admins involved here didn't change your block to indefinite already. You have demonstrated that you haven't a clue about WP:NOR and don't want to know about it. Beyond that, you're the victim of the tyrants? GMAB! Toddst1 (talk) 16:45, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, JG4236. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the pages Irving Glickman, Esmeralda Arboleda Cadavid and Mireya Arboleda, you have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 19:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding birth dates without reliable sources after numerous warnings and two blocks

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:51, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JG4236 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Okay. Let's have a normal conversation about this. I would like to know and believe I have the right to know which page I did not add proper sources to. If the page is a birth dates page with no source, blocking me makes no sense because you can just click on the person's page and see what their birthday is and sources about their birthday. I think an indefinite block just for this is absolutely and completely unnecessary and harsh. You, administrators, act like my goal is to vandalize and ruin Wikipedia and not follow any of the rules. My goal is the complete opposite. I want to help make Wikipedia better for readers and I believe in many cases I've done that. Sometimes I will make mistakes and forget every specific rule and I apologize for that. The proper response to someone who does that is to help them with Wikipedia procedure, the proper response is NOT to block them indefinitely. JG4236 (talk) 15:59, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

WP:BLP is the strictest policy on Wikipedia, as editing about living people must be accurate.

We are helping you with learning this policy by preventing you from further violations, which helps both Wikipedia and you, until you are able to abide by the policy and make sure the sources say what you are claiming they say. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 16:46, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

None of the sources you included in your edits to Naomi B. Robbins include a birth date, which is why that's been reverted. I have an NYT subscription, and I checked that source myself. Having been blocked twice for adding unsourced birthdates, you have no excuses to claim ignorance of our WP:BLP policy, which applies to all editors, including you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:42, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I understand (mostly). I am wondering when you think it would be appropriate to allow me to edit again.--JG4236 (talk) 18:20, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

By the tone of your argument, it sounds like never. Toddst1 (talk) 01:47, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Naomi B. Robbins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wiley.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:JG4236/2024prez

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at User:JG4236/2024prez. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bait30 ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 03:24, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:JG4236/2028prez

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at User:JG4236/2028prez. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bait30 ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 03:24, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:JG4236/television

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at User:JG4236/television. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bait30 ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 02:36, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tom Kirkman

Hello, JG4236. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tom Kirkman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:04, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tom Kirkman

Hello, JG4236. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tom Kirkman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:56, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:JulianGlickman.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:JulianGlickman.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:JG4236

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as User:JG4236, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 03:05, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]