User talk:Iuthemwlorg

Welcome!

Hello, Iuthemwlorg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tutorial to help get you oriented editing Wikipedia)
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! We're so glad you're here! Ping me with {{u|Jim1138}} and sign "~~~~" or message me on my talk page. 09:55, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your warm welcome Iuthemwlorg (talk) 10:05, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Widr (talk) 06:58, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Iuthemwlorg, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Muslim World League has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Widr (talk) 07:15, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:48, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Our conflict of interest policy

Hello, Iuthemwlorg. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:47, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@TheRedPenOfDoom: A lot of information to read, I'll check them and get back to this in a couple days. And I would like to apologizes about the destructive editing that took place on Sunday 7/6/2015. Best Regards
Iuthemwlorg (talk) 09:37, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An account is for an individual

I noticed that you used "we" a lot. If more than one person from the organization is editing, each person will need to establish their own account and edit from that account only. We (Wikipedia) does not allow WP:ROLE accounts.

See also the terms of use [1] -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:50, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@TheRedPenOfDoom: I'am one person I represent my organization, I used "we" because that words are my organization word not mine. Regards

--Iuthemwlorg (talk) 08:33, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Your addition to Wikipedia:Help desk has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Once again, do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia, the copyright material you added here has been removed. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:08, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Same issue with your addition to Talk:Muslim World League- stop copying the Muslim World League website and pasting it into Wikipedia, it violates WP:COPYVIO. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:08, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Help desk. Krakatoa Katie 13:21, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Joseph2302: I really don't know how you want me to prove that the paragraph I wrote had permission to be used in Wikipedia.
It's simply as this: I represent my organization I am the Web-Manager of Muslim World League website, and I just wanted to correct a miss information inserted in your wiki Muslim World League?
You are dealing with one side of the story (The writer opinion or his references). Furthermore, Said Ramadan who suppose to be the founder of the Muslim World League - According to reports in Wikipedia has fled Egypt to Switzerland in 1958. For your information, The Muslim World League was established in 1962. You can see clearly the contridiciton in this report which is unacceptable to The Muslim World League.
Best Regards. Iuthemwlorg (talk) 09:21, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't have permission, because the website it was copied from does not have a copyright license compatible with Wikipedia. The only way it would not be a copyright violation is if the text was donated to Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:Donating copyright materials, however organisation websites are never neutral tone, so it would still have to be rewritten. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:35, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. It also appears that your account is intended to be used for the purpose of telling the world about an organization, person or cause that you consider worthwhile. Unfortunately, many good causes are not sufficiently notable for their own Wikipedia article, and all users are discouraged from editing in any area where they have an inherent conflict of interest. You may wish to consider one of these alternative outlets.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you.

--Orange Mike | Talk 01:00, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]