User talk:Ishiura

This is Ishiura's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ishihara Shikō (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Ishihara Shikō instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ishihara Shikō and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ishihara Shikō, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:06, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ishiura! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:06, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Momoyama Harue moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Momoyama Harue, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 16:41, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Hi thanks for creating Takahashi Deishū which I’ve just reviewed. When translating material from one wiki to another you need to state the source in your edit summary when you create the article. There’s also a template you can add to the talk page: I’ve added it for you. Mccapra (talk) 23:23, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Soeda Azenbō

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Soeda Azenbō requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://smiletimegh.com/soeda-azenbo-biography-career-awards-net-worth-facts-and-life-story/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:07, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. For more than a month, I wasn't able to check up on Wikipedia due to my router being destroyed. Thankfully, I'm now back.

It's very unfortunate that the article on Azenbō I started was taken down, as the copyright claim was fraudulent. It appears the text in the claim source was copied from an early revision of the Wikipedia article. I will provide here several pieces of evidence to defend myself.

A few points:
- I have a practice of logging articles I create including their original publication dates in a collapsible box on my user page. As suggested by the timestamp still available in the log, I first published the Azenbō article during January, not long after creating my Wikipedia account. If you suspect that I added that timestamp at a later time, you can of course confirm its legitimacy via the edit history of my user page. In comparison, note that the webpage I am alleged to have stolen the text from is stamped with a date indicating creation during March.
- At the end of the webpage provided with the copyright claim, there's a plaintext-smalltext « [ja] » after Tsuchitori Toshiyuki's name. Although they were careful to trim out the citation marks, they failed to edit out the ja:wiki illumination link that was present before I had created the article on Tsuchitori (at which point I swapped the illumination for a standard internal link).
- In addition, you may note details like the format and titling of paragraphs (Biography/Legacy) which can be compared to the structure of my first article on Ishihara Shikō, as well as listing in the page title things like "net worth" and "awards" which are not present in the text body.

I hope this statement gives an indication of my disappointment that, not only was an article I put a great deal of effort into starting obliterated for no reason, but I was also accused of being a thief.

I hope that better oversight with regard to spurious copyright claims can be put in place to protect the efforts of individual editors in the future. Because I had no internet access, I wasn't able to log in and defend the article before it was obliterated. Is there any way I can ensure that other users be made aware when such a claim is made against future articles I write or contribute to, so that someone would be available to test the veracity of the claim and thereby preserve the article? I thought about hooking articles up to project task forces, but I don't know if that would actually increase visibility.

I originally posted this on April 6, but I didn't [reply] directly so I'm putting it up again. Thank you for reading. Ishiura (talk) 17:45, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Todoroki Buhē moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Todoroki Buhē, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:06, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jiří Tondl moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jiří Tondl, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 10:04, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Todoroki Buhē

Hello, Ishiura. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Todoroki Buhē, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jiří Tondl

Hello, Ishiura. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jiří Tondl, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jiří Tondl

Hello, Ishiura. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jiří Tondl".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:02, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ishiura. Thank you for your work on Amappo. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day and Merry Christmas!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 18:39, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sankebetsu brown bear incident

You've forgotten to revert the link Heikichi Yamamoto with your Yamamoto Heikichi. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.244.87.103 (talk) 10:13, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ishiura, please note that the request made here was an attempt to have you edit the Sankebetsu brown bear incident on behalf of an editor who has been blocked and continuously evading blocks. All edits to the article since December 24 have been block evasion by that editor (resulting in semi-protection of the article), and in addition the link itself should not have been changed per WP:NOTBROKEN. I do not at all believe it was your intention to be editing for a blocked editor, but I am going to revert the most recent edit to the article under WP:PROXYING. If you have any questions or concerns about this, please let me know. Best, Dekimasuよ! 05:02, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese translations' request

User talk:Immanuelle/Proposed article translations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.207.186.61 (talk) 19:05, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tanigawadake Ropeway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cable car. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Blast Cats for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blast Cats is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blast Cats until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 09:44, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blast Cats moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Blast Cats. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because AfD outcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blast Cats. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 12:49, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ishiura. Thank you for your work on Hazama Hidenori. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hirata Yukie

Hello, Ishiura. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hirata Yukie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:06, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Ishiura. Thank you for your work on Snow Peak (company). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:07, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hirata Kanetane

Hello, Ishiura. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hirata Kanetane, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:05, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hirata Yukie

Hello, Ishiura. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Hirata Yukie".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:54, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hirata Kanetane

Hello, Ishiura. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Hirata Kanetane".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:33, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! DoctorMatt (talk) 03:07, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:People from Sandvika

A tag has been placed on Category:People from Sandvika indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:22, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Blast Cats

Hello, Ishiura. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Blast Cats, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Ishiura. Thank you for your work on Gandō. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:54, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]