User talk:Fairlyoddparents1234

This is Fairlyoddparents1234's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Fairlyoddparents1234}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Before you talk to me.....

Welcome to my talk page! If you are here for reasons relating to the removal of the Verizon Plus redirect, please scroll down to the bottom of the page. I would like to remind you that I am going on a Pink Sheeter/ NYSEr/ NASDAQer search. I am adding further trade info on major companies. Please inform me if you have any concerns. Thank you for your understanding. FOPFan300 22:27, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello and Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. However, I noticed that your username (Ipis209.195.82.87) may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it resembles an IP address, which may confuse other users. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account to use for editing. Thank you. Daniel Case (talk) 04:23, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of assets owned by Viacom

Please stop adding non-free images to this list article. The use of non-free images on this article violates WP:NFLISTS. Further, none of the uses were justified with non-free rationales, which is a requirement of WP:NFCC #10c. I've re-removed the images. If you have questions, please ask. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 13:00, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Toronto, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Johnny Au _{(talk/contributions)} 03:01, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Edit summaries

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. –BMRR (talk) 23:10, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly reminder: please provide edit summaries before saving your edits. Thank you. –BMRR (talk) 21:11, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page List of The Fairly OddParents DVD and VHS has been reverted.
Your edit here to List of The Fairly OddParents DVD and VHS was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://fairlyoddparents.wikia.com/wiki/List_of_The_Fairly_OddParents_DVD_and_VHS) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to an external Wiki, then please note that these links should generally not be included (see 'links to avoid' #12).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:55, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Edit summaries

Hi! When making edits, it is considered polite to leave an edit summary so that other editors can more easily understand the changes you make. Thanks! Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:08, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please provide an edit summary before saving your edits? –BMRR (talk) 01:59, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to MBTA Commuter Rail. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. –BMRR (talk) 18:26, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sprint

Please do not re-add Liberty Media as the parent company of Sprint Nextel. Liberty owns a tiny stake (2%). Sprint is not a subsidiary of Liberty; there are likely investment banks that own larger stakes in Sprint. These are known as "institutional investors", but that doesn't make them parent companies. To quote the documentation of the company infobox: "If the article's subject company is a division or subsidiary of another company (commonly referred to as a holding company or a parent company), list the full legal name of the holding company or parent company in this field." That does not correctly describe the relationship between Liberty and Sprint. oknazevad (talk) 22:40, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Please do not add unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. –BMRR (talk) 02:41, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect infobox

There was no need to modify {{Infobox rail line}} to include "Reporting Marks", because that relates to information about a line or route, which does not have any marks, not the company that operates. You should be using {{Infobox rail}} instead. Secondarywaltz (talk) 15:23, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All right. But then I'm gonna do an infobox swap.

The need for a reporting mark is actually necessary. Some people have placed the {{Infobox rail line}} in several commuter rail articles, including this. I need to show the reporting marks of them in the infobox. Otherwise, I might as well replace them with the {{Infobox Public Transit}}, which Wikipedia doesn't recommend. What should I do?!?!?! (answer on my talk page please) Thank you. FOPFan300 21:49, 11 November 2011 (UTC) (moved the conversation here)

The correct Infobox should be used. The confusion usually comes about when a system has only one line. Secondarywaltz (talk) 05:22, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

American, British, Canadian English

Please do not change between various forms of English spelling in articles as you did at Keanu Reeves. As a Canadian, his article uses Canadian English spellings. Yworo (talk) 18:52, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Guardian Media Entertainment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Media (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Media in New York City, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WWOR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Discover Card. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Logical Cowboy (talk) 22:08, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MTV Networks logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MTV Networks logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 07:48, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Ivanhoe Mines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rio Tinto (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Breaking formatting

Thank you for your contributions, however, please do not introduce formatting-breaking edits like those you recently made to South Station and North Station. The |type parameter should not be used for stations using the MBTA infobox header; it messes up the carefully styled colored boxes. Additionally, your edit to North Station completely botched up the styling - you should have realized this in preview mode.

Additionally, please start using edit summaries. It makes tracking changes easier and provides transparency; Wikipedia guidelines say it's not optional: Wikipedia:FIES. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:44, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please tell me how I can add Amtrak station status info to the I-box without introducing that CRA you know what? Thank you! BTW, I just began to make heavy editing. (RESPOND HERE AND ADD TO MY TALK PAGE) Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234) 02:01, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you're asking about the |type parameter, the answer is simple: don't bother. It's better presented by the s-line templates under the |services parameter. For some reason, the infobox template happens to be such that the |type parameter always borks up the formatting on any colored header. I also feel that it messes with the clean look of the infobox, with a single header followed immediately by a picture. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:19, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll accept that, though do you think it would be possible to switch the "MBTA" entry in the |style parameter to Amtrak? Then I can use the |type parameter at ease without messing the box. For the name, I will apply the MBTA Station name template to the name line. The North Station article already uses it. Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234) 23:12, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, as I said, I personally prefer the clean look, where any information about the station goes below the picture. But that's a matter of personal preference and I'll leave it be for now - though I like the current look of North Station better. I made the South Station picture bigger and removed an irrelevant caption and that helped the look as well. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:44, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone in favour or disfavour of seeing the Verizon Plus redirect being removed....

If you are here to respond to my Verizon Plus redirect removal, please respond below this entry using ": votre texte ici(your text here)". Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234) 00:53, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

Hi. When you recently edited Pace plc, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plc (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Fairlyoddparents1234. You have new messages at Alpha Quadrant's talk page.
Message added 18:41, 18 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 18:41, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Estrella TV logo...

I have removed all non-Libermann station uses of this logo in articles. The difference between this and Me and This is we use the customized local logos for those stations, which this is not, and overuse of a logo throughout the site violates WP:FAIRUSE. Please read the talk history of WP:TVS; this has already been addressed with This TV and TBN, and do not re-add the logo to the articles I have removed it from. Thank you. Nate • (chatter) 05:29, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No one is picking on you...

...But the truth is most of your edits are not very helpful, at least in my opinion. They offer little else but redundancy. My issue with you is over the QUALITY of your edits. Take constructive criticism for what it is and don't cry "bully" when someone does offer it. DreamMcQueen (talk) 18:02, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fine then. But please read your talk page. I wanted to ask you something that made me come of with that conclusion. Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234) 18:07, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your quote: "I am so annoyed that you take the good organization out of the Wikipedia. I have explained to you clearly that the CBS affiliates list needs a link to the CBS TV Stations article in order to lessen the labour of having to run a search for such info on the independent stations and CW stations. I have also ran a search to determine wether or not they will remove the DMA system. They will not. While I appreciate the alphabetical ordering, PLEASE KEEP THE DMA NUMBERS ON THE ABC AFFILIATES LIST! I am thinking on warning the administrators on you before this gets too far, unless you can explain clearly to me why you have done the above. Thank you. Fairly OddParents Freak"

You need to take a chill pill and check out the archived discussion at WP:TVS. By the way, I'd appreciate if you would practice civility the next time you choose to leave me a message or I will report you for harassment. DreamMcQueen (talk) 17:24, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is no discussion there. STOP BEING MY PET PEEVE and explain clearly with direct proof why you keep removing the DMa and all other useful tidbit I've added. Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234) 20:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have gone too far

Who authorized you to put a redirect on my user page? I certainly did not. I guess I'm gonna have to undo it now. I am warning you right here and right now: if you try to intimidate me, I will report you. DreamMcQueen (talk) 21:27, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(Personal attack removed)

I will leave you alone, but UNTIL WE SETTLE THIS DEBATE. OK? (And I shall report the aforementioned as an insult; that is my Wikia name as well ClubPenguinDark.) Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234) 14:33, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DRN discussion reopened

Though I previously closed it, I have reopened the listing at Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#List_of_CBS_television_affiliates_.28table.29.2C_List_of_ABC_television_affiliates_.28table.29 due to the objection of another volunteer at DRN. Please resume proceedings there. — TransporterMan (TALK) 13:16, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CBS Mandate

Hi. Outside Wikipedia itself, a Google search of the phrase "CBS Mandate" turns up only a couple of mentions on message boards and YouTube comments (neither of which are verifiable/reliable sources) and WP mirror sites. I would like to find an official source for the use of this phrase. Thanks. JTRH (talk) 18:34, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

While there are FEW sources indeed on the CBS Mandate, I have added info on it because that term redirects on to the article in question. The articles on each station and the YT vids are enough proof on the standardization. Also keep in mind that "CBS Mandate" is a popular term for the standardization. I have added "so-called" to the end of the article to state so. Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234)

18:52, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, and I'm not trying to provoke an argument, but the fact that something is mentioned enough times on Wikipedia and YouTube is not "proof" of anything. If it were a "popular term," it would show up in independent searches. It appears to be little-used industry jargon with no official status. Thanks. JTRH (talk) 18:59, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just keep it. YouTubers may find some sense in it. I do doubt if "CBS Mandate" is an official term as well. Otherwise, I'd suggest we find the relevant WikiProject and ask them to begin removing the term in it's entirety fro the Wikipedia. And BTW, I'm from Canada. Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234)

19:02, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning...

...Leave me alone. Do not leave me any messages on my talk page, and do not ask me to respond to any of your requests on your talk page or elsewhere. If you continue to hound and harass me, I WILL REPORT YOU TO AN ADMINISTRATOR. DreamMcQueen (talk) 19:36, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please be nice to me and I will be nice to you. I am not attempting to harass you. I want to help you get good Wikipedia behaviour; I am not being a sicko in this case. Other people receive requests like these, especially if their actions are You may wish to read the policies here. And please do have some civility here as this is an ENCYCLOPEDIA, NOT a BATTLEGROUND. (I also suggest you read some of the essays on civility here as they may provide you with good advice. I am not mad at you; please be considerate and let it go as well. Thank you. Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234)

19:56, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Citigroup 1999 logo.svg

A tag has been placed on File:Citigroup 1999 logo.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. kashmiri 22:52, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

List of CBS television affiliates (table)

I have taken a look at the history of the above linked page and you are beyond 3RR at that page. This is your 3RR warning. I have warned User:DreamMcQueen of this as well. I would recommend not editing that page anymore so as to avoid a block and I would also disengage from User:DreamMcQueen. Just steer clear of him. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 05:44, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Fairlyoddparents1234. You have new messages at Neutralhomer's talk page.
Message added 22:29, 12 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Neutralhomer • Talk • 22:29, 12 July 2012 (UTC) 22:29, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:LIN Media logo.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LIN Media logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:23, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:LIN Media logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:LIN Media logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:03, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Your recent editing history at Tribune Company shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Toddst1 (talk) 15:33, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I acknowledge the war and regret any disruptions caused by this. You are advised to see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive759#Ongoing, Blatant Edit-Warring by User:DreamMcQueen Also note that I have Aspergers and my resulting behaviour can easily result in issues. Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234)

15:45, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Of course I saw that. I closed it. Toddst1 (talk) 15:46, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FOP1234, let me add another suggestion: stay away from DreamMcQueen. If you keep edit-warring with him, and if you leave one more such dramatic message on his talk page, I will block you. If you indeed have Asperger's then you should know better than to keep engaging him. You should seek drama-free articles to edit. Good luck. Drmies (talk) 02:24, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry!

Hi Fairlyoddparents. You may notice that I've trimmed a little bit of text out of your editor review. I did this because you gave away a little too much personal information, and we try to keep people safe by hiding that sort of thing if they share it. I know it's a pain to have someone come along and wipe out part of your writing, but it would be best if you didn't share information like what I removed anywhere on Wikipedia. I wish you luck with your editor review. Happy editing! A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:00, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please contribute into my review?...Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234) 18:07, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, I don't know anything about you, so my review wouldn't be very useful. One idea you could try to get more useful feedback is contacting people you've worked with before - people you've had disputes with, or people who have helped you - and asking them to give their opinions on your review. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:22, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Canadian Pacific wordmark.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:Canadian Pacific wordmark.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:21, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CBS Records

There is a discussion in the Talk:CBS Records page which I'm asking you to get involved in. As you may know, the former CBS Records label is now Columbia Records and the former CBS Records company is now Sony Music. Someone wants to add more material about the former CBS Records in the current CBS Records article which is not connected in any way with the old CBS Records. Steelbeard1 (talk) 18:32, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your inquiry: "Ban User:Rollosmokes?"

A total ban seems a bit extreme, in my humble opinion. As for a topic ban from WP:TVS, I will leave that up to you and other members of the community to decide. I simply don't know whether or not banning him from television stations alone will solve his page ownership problem. However, I would certainly endorse an interaction ban between you two, as you seem to be taking his words and actions much too personally. Rotorcowboy ^talk
_contribs 21:24, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Right. I will talk with the members of WP:TVS on a possible t-ban. I'm certain for sure though that he won't be welcome on "The CW Television Network" anymore. :-) Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234) 13:33, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon the intrusion, but if this is a sockpuppet of a previously banned user, he needs to be banned for sockpuppetry let alone content disputes. JTRH (talk) 15:55, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rollo has several socks, so it is evident he isn't stopping anytime soon. We have even had to delete articles his socks have created, which caused disruption to the community. A ban is necessary. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 19:47, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A message is going on WP:TVS soon or someone please do it on my behalf. Thank you! Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234) 20:34, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Media in Atlanta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WPBA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Clearwire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japanese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:TXCN.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:TXCN.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:37, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

American Broadcasting Company

This edit has been removed. The black and white logo of ABC is not a different logo to the one currently on the infobox. It is the same logo but in 2D. Saying that a logo is a different one because it's in 2D instead of 3D is POV.

During the 1970s, 1980s and 1980s, ABC had different color variants for its logo such as black, blue, yellow and even green. All of these colors have been used by ABC in the past on its logo. Are we to say that these were all different logos. Of course not. They were all the same logo but on different colors.

The logo currently in the article's infobox is the same logo that has been used since 1962. It's the same logo as the only that you added, but in different colors and dimensional spaces. If you prefer that we use the black and white version on the infobox instead of the blue 3D one, we can do this since the black and white version is still regularly used by ABC . But we don't need the same logo twice on the article under the pretext that it's an different dimensions. This fails both WP:N and WP:NPOV.

Please let me know if you prefer that we put the black and white on the infobox instead. Thanks. Farine (talk) 14:35, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If that is the case keep the 3D version, and place note of logo evolution. I don;'t think the 1948 ABC logo is necessary either... I don't think the article should be used as a logo gallery after all. Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234)

22:04, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I had originally removed the 1946 logo this summer. But a user didn't seem too happy about this so I reinstated it. But in the case of the so-called "1962-2007" logo, it is the same logo, just in 2D. So it's hard to justify its presence when we already have the same logo elsewhere on the article.

I don't think it would be a good idea to place a note about the logo evolution. First, the image is on the infobox and it would be weird to place such note on the infobox. Secondly, the evolution of logo is hardly notable. The 1962 logo of ABC has been subject to several evolutions even before the switch to 3D in 2007. Thirdly, this so-called evolution is POV because many people don't consider this to be an evolution at all. Someone decided that the 3D logo was a different logo than the 2D one. Certainly not everyone share this opinion. By refraining of getting ourselves in all of this debate, we're respecting the neutrality of the matter. Farine (talk) 20:20, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So we should only place the current logo in all WP articles dealing with TV networks e.g Ion Television... Actually, I meant "The current ABC logo as of 2007" Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234)

I actually believe that NBC logos can do the talking here. Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234)

22:10, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I do indeed believe that only one logo should be per television network. I would go as far as saying that articles such as NBC logos shouldn't even exist on Wikipedia.

I personally won't touch the 1946 ABC logo. But if you want to remove it, go ahead. Just be ready to provide a valid edit summary for your move. Cheers. Farine (talk) 22:54, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why delete all forms of logo history such as NBC logos? Let me guess , WP:NFCC.. But you'll receive huge criticism from The Television WikiProject. They actually turned down several deletion nominations. Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234)

23:05, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I never said that I wanted to delete these articles. I just said that if it was for me, these articles wouldn't exist in the first place. Farine (talk) 23:13, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. You have very serious issues with images on articles. You would enjoy articles with no images at all. And I see that you are Canadian... Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234)

21:57, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide an example (other than ABC that is)?Farine (talk) 00:38, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, what I mean is that you are against the archival of logos for discussion online. I wouldn't laugh if you were against the Logopedia hosted at Wikia. Go ahead and request the deletion of older logos. I dare you too. Oh, and by the way, look at Talk:American Broadcasting Company logos for reasons why you should not go way to far with logos. Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234)

16:39, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Sunbeam TV.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:Sunbeam TV.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on KNSD

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on KNSD. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Unfortunately, you are equally as guilty as the other user you tagged. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 02:38, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to point your attention to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234)

02:43, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I ran across this from your request at WP:RPP. Without looking into your concerns about the other editor, continually reverting other people's edits is generally considered edit warring. You should instead seek dispute resolution, such as waiting for another editor to build consensus, requesting input at related projects like WikiProject Television Stations, or posting at third opinion.—Bagumba (talk) 02:58, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well as a matter of fact, I'm planning to start a discussion on what comprises an owned and operated station at WT:TVS Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234)

21:27, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great. It's always good to get more editors involved when there is a deadlock. In the future, another compromise to edit-warring might be to use {{Disputed-inline}} for the text in question, alerting readers that the text is questionable while directing them to discuss.—Bagumba (talk) 22:35, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Fairlyoddparents1234. See the result of the edit warring complaint at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Spshu reported by User:Fairlyoddparents1234 (Result: Both warned). Further reverts by either party (before consensus is reached) run the risk of admin action. I am glad to see that an effort is being made at WT:TVS. You should make a note of that fact at Talk:KNSD in case the war breaks out again and admins have to look into it. It looks odd to see a furious revert war and then nothing at all on the talk page. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 05:33, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New World Communications television stations

The related Category:New World Communications television stations has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page.

The nomination is nothing personal, just that the company has been defunct for twelve years and is little remembered by anyone outside of broadcast enthusiasts along with NW stations being considered de facto Fox-owned, and that the category is not needed. Nate • (chatter) 03:55, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Rodale logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:Rodale logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:28, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Logo-denver.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Logo-denver.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:17, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:WKAQ logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:WKAQ logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:17, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:McClatchy Co.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:McClatchy Co.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:22, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Script problem

In this edit, there is no template named {{section}}. Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:35, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I never made that edit. Must be an error I encountered with with Twinkle. Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234)

C 14:41, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTBROKEN

Hi Fairly,

Please revert these edits which removed a mass of redirects from the article. We aren't supposed to be removing redirects per WP:NOTBROKEN: "There is nothing inherently wrong with linking to redirects to articles. Some editors are tempted, upon finding a link to a redirect page, to bypass the redirect and point the link directly at the target page. While there are a limited number of cases where this is beneficial, it is generally an unhelpful exercise, and it can actually be detrimental." Also, you removed the hyphens from the WLW stations, even though the sources cited use hyphens (which is why I used the hyphens). I realize that the call signs are non-standard, but that is how they are displayed in the source. Firsfron of Ronchester 23:03, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I refuse to revert per WP:NOTANARCHY; don't exert force on me. Do it yourself and I promise I won't touch it. I personally believe avoidance of redirects are a good idea for featured lists. I'm actually fine with redirects on articles, but would rather see redirects removed on lists. If you like it like that, than I'll employ redirects on the DuMont and Paramount lists as well. Speeds up the JavaScript anyway. In the meantime, I have brought the attention of the WLW/ Crosley signs to WT:TVS. Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234)

C 03:26, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:CWB logo.svg

A tag has been placed on File:CWB logo.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234) C 23:57, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:CWB logo.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:CWB logo.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:37, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File transfers

Helped Do I need to modify a file page when transferring a file to Commons? Like I know they are supposed to be on Commons as they are simple text or shapes, but they are marked as non-free. I'm afraid of violating policies... Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234) C 17:31, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free files are not eligible for transfer to Commons. Does this answer your question? If not, please identify the file, so we can give more specific advice. --SPhilbrick (Talk) 17:35, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Like as in the wordmark logo of the Canadian Pacific Railway. It is free due to lack of originality, but I had uploaded it with a rationale for safety purposes... Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234)

C 17:39, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If it doesn't pass the threshold of originality (and I agree it does not) you can add the following template to the file description page

If you believe the image is subject to trademark, which seems possible, but I just don't know, you can also add the following template:

You should change the FUR template to an information template.

Then there is no need to arrange for transfer to Commons, it should happen automatically.--SPhilbrick (Talk) 18:23, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've analyzed W:File:Canadian Pacific wordmark.svg. It is simple and does not seem elaborate. PD-Text is good... Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234)

C 18:26, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So if it does fall on public domain due to simplicity, just modify the file page, right? Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234) C 18:31, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you don't mind if I answer. Yes, if you believe the logo does not meet the Threshold of originality then you would replace {{Non-free logo}} with {{PD-textlogo}} and {{trademark}}, and the fair use rationale with {{Information | description = | source = | date = | author = }}. Powergate92Talk 18:52, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of former NTA Film Network affiliates in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WCCT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of former NTA Film Network affiliates in the United States

You have comments on the above list waiting to be addressed at WP:FLC. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:27, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WJZY Logo

It's the regular CW logo with the current "46" next to it; it's easily described in text, so I knew exactly what I was doing and don't care about deletion one way or the other. Nate • (chatter) 04:50, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you'd want to consider Commons or deletion soon, especially after July 1. BTW, I don't see no CW logo. Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234) T | C Member: WP:TVS 23:35, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The current logo has been placed in PD so it doesn't matter if its deleted or not. And again, I have described the CW logo in text; it's not needed in the least as the "46" has remained the same since 2011 and will remain so. Nate • (chatter) 00:21, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You did not answer my question: Are you going to send this to Commons after July 1st? Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234) T | C Member: WP:TVS 21:07, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not sending it to Commons. It's not needed there. I find the entire 'send a logo to Commons' process very clumsy to begin with. Nate • (chatter) 22:10, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll delete it then. Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234) T | C Member: WP:TVS 22:39, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:WBAL.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:WBAL.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:52, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:WBAL.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:WBAL.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 16:43, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TPH listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:TPH. Since you had some involvement with the Template:TPH redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). — This, that and the other (talk) 10:44, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marchex

The article Marchex has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable company. No evidence of awards or in depth coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 13:22, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brookfield Properties logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brookfield Properties logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. James086 ^Talk 04:24, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Univision Communications.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Univision Communications.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:47, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jones Lang LaSalle logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jones Lang LaSalle logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:51, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation: WikiProject Autism

Greetings! You are hereby invited to WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of autism, Asperger syndrome, and Autistic culture on Wikipedia. As the project emphasizes contribution from autistic editors, it is especially interested in you, who have chosen to list yourself as a Wikipedian with Asperger syndrome. Muffinator (talk) 04:22, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Wikipedia ads	file info – #251

Nomination of Marchex for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marchex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marchex until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:58, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Realty Income logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Realty Income logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:14, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KOAT.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KOAT.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 03:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Freeview logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Freeview logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:28, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WMC ThisTV logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WMC ThisTV logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Caisse logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Caisse logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:02, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Royal Bank of Scotland Group.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Royal Bank of Scotland Group.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 19:09, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Who killed Osama bin Laden listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Who killed Osama bin Laden. Since you had some involvement with the Who killed Osama bin Laden redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GZWDer (talk) 05:22, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Who killed Osama bin Laden? listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Who killed Osama bin Laden?. Since you had some involvement with the Who killed Osama bin Laden? redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GZWDer (talk) 05:23, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nick Mag Comics 2007.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nick Mag Comics 2007.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cadillac Fairview.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cadillac Fairview.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:ThisTV Phoenix.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ThisTV Phoenix.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Marchjuly (talk) 01:02, 26 February 2016 (UTC) -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:02, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you contribute to the page I made?

I made a page here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Types_of_mythological_or_fantastic_beings_in_contemporary_fiction It could use more contributions. Much appreciated... Tamtrible (talk) 07:29, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WARALERT listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:WARALERT. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:WARALERT redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — xaosflux ^Talk 00:58, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Big happens here listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Big happens here. Since you had some involvement with the Big happens here redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:53, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ABC Owned TV Stations.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ABC Owned TV Stations.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 06:06, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PREIT.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PREIT.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:58, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NASDAQ:NDAQ listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect NASDAQ:NDAQ. Since you had some involvement with the NASDAQ:NDAQ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 16:31, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ThisTV Phoenix.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ThisTV Phoenix.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NYSE:CVC listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect NYSE:CVC. Since you had some involvement with the NYSE:CVC redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:07, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Orphaned non-free image File:Ivanhoe Cambridge.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ivanhoe Cambridge.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rodale logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rodale logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:09, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ivanhoe Cambridge.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ivanhoe Cambridge.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:MTV Networks logo.gif

The file File:MTV Networks logo.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 08:01, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tokyo Stock Exchange.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tokyo Stock Exchange.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alabama Public Television logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alabama Public Television logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Vivendi old logo.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Vivendi old logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WPRI-TV.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WPRI-TV.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:18, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WWSI Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WWSI Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:21, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:WPIX ThisTV.png

The file File:WPIX ThisTV.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused image. If you ask me, this is too complex for PD-logo.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:52, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ThisTV KCWX.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ThisTV KCWX.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Universal Music Group.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Universal Music Group.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Channel 13 Eyewitness News" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Channel 13 Eyewitness News. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 3#Channel 13 Eyewitness News until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:44, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Eyewitness News 5" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Eyewitness News 5. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 6#Eyewitness News 5 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:56, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:WMUR.svg

Thank you for uploading File:WMUR.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"U2BE" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect U2BE. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 20#U2BE until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 00:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"SuperStation, Inc." listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect SuperStation, Inc.. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 14#SuperStation, Inc. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WGBH logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WGBH logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fisher Communications.svg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fisher Communications.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 00:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cigna logo-en.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cigna logo-en.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:04, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CPP Investment Board.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CPP Investment Board.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:05, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]