User talk:Server 686

July 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Orange Mike | Talk 04:16, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Server 686 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not meaning to cause harm with my username, needed something to make 'Intel Inside' valid. I wish to continue to make small edits of phrases or words, assisting in readability and functionality.

Decline reason:

You'll need to propose a new username that complies with the username policy and does not have commercial slogans or references to drug use. 331dot (talk) 11:11, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Server 686 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

server_686 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

As mentioned above, there was no malicious intent behind my actions. I'm more than happy to change my name to an alternative, such as server_686, although am slightly unsure as to correct procedure regarding order of username change requests and unblocking. If I could get some pointers that would be great.

Accept reason:

I've renamed and unblocked your account. PhilKnight (talk) 17:24, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've adjusted your unblock request to include an rename request. PhilKnight (talk) 14:04, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Orangemike: - do you object to an unblock? PhilKnight (talk) 14:04, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No objection here. The "420" thing is a bit of petty mischief some internet "wits" have been doing, and you got caught up in the sweep. This new name also avoids any implication of connection with Intel, which was also problematic. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:14, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your vote on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MacBook Air (M1)

Hi, we do not yet have consensus about whether to delete the article MacBook Air (M1). As a contributor to the MacBook articles, I'd like to invite you to take part in the discussion on the deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MacBook Air (M1). Thank you! Andibrema (talk) 00:24, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]