User talk:Inscriptions of India

Welcome!

Hello, Inscriptions of India, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Adakiko (talk) 10:11, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Padmakshi Temple—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 10:07, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That content was well-sourced. Disagreement is not a valid reason for removal. YouTube is typically not a wp:reliable source See WP:RSPYT regarding this. Your YouTube link is no longer available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82tDEao4Z-w Adakiko (talk) 10:11, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Padmakshi Temple. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Adakiko (talk) 10:12, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Also, going to Commons isn't a good idea, as you will probably end up Global locked Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 11:35, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nice message you left for me on my Commons: talk page here. I recommend you read wp:NPA. Adakiko (talk) 12:15, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Indra IV. Again, you need to cite a reliable source for this. See referencing for beginners Adakiko (talk) 19:50, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Verifiability is a core Wikipedia policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:42, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop vandalizing articles

Four times you removed references saying "provide page number" when page number was already there:

[1] p78
[2] pages 105–106
[3] p78
[4] pages 105–106

Stop vandalizing. 220.158.158.142 (talk) 18:23, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Ellora Caves, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:56, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 07:59, 12 March 2023 (UTC) [reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 14:13, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]