User talk:In.DM

Welcome!

Hello, InCorp Global, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:In.Corp Group Pte Ltd, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — O Fortuna^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 06:51, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:In.Corp Group Pte Ltd

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:In.Corp Group Pte Ltd, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of https://www.incorp.asia/about/our-board-of-directors/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — O Fortuna^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 06:51, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There have been two problems identified with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia; and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:41, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In.DM (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

In.DM (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

This new proposed username has been checked against Wikipedia's username guidelines tool and passed the check. We would also be aligning ourselves with G12 of Wikipedia's guidelines and removing the copyright infringement segments and rewriting the segment. For G11, we would like to clarify that this Wikipedia page is not for self-promotion or puffery.

Decline reason:

The fact that you are referencing CSD criteria (which are instructions for deleting articles) and not content guidelines (which are instructions on writing articles) is enough to give me pause, but more concerning is your use of the first person plural, which suggests that more than one person has access to this account. That in itself is enough to warrant leaving this account permanently blocked. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:31, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Renamed. However, I will leave it to another admin to consider your unblock request. Just Chilling (talk) 02:35, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

In.DM (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Firstly, thank you Just Chilling for approving my username change request. Secondly, my sincere apologies for using the term "we" when describing my situation - I would like to clarity and confirm that I am the only person with access to this account. I also acknowledge and would like to apologise for creating the Cheryl Lee account to repost the content - my assumption was that since I had fumbled with my username error + first person plural error with this account, perhaps if I got it right the first time round with the other account, it'd be easier to get the content through. I am a new user to Wikipedia and I apologise sincerely for all three mistakes. Could the blocking admins help me out with the editing of my article? I have removed any links to external pages and also addressed the copyright issue that was highlighted previously - can I find out how else I can improve my content? I genuinely would like to make a useful contribution to Wikipedia and am a huge fan of the site. Thank you in advance to anyone who can help.

Decline reason:

It's rather obvious that you're here to promote your company, likely in violation of the disclosure requirements. Thus I don't see that unblocking you would improve the encyclopedia. Huon (talk) 21:22, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.