User talk:Idrissou9cm/sandbox

Moussa,

The sources look great! Looking forward to reading a draft which covers the topics you discussed. One suggestion is attempting to find an internet version of some/all the print sources you have. Typically when reading a wikipedia article, one wants to be able to go to the source directly (online) versus having to drive to a library to find it. There are many online versions of books/articles.

Draft Feedback

Moussa, it looks like you have found some good sources for your article addition. As you further consider what information you want to add to this article, I suggest thinking about perhaps 2 topics that you want to discuss in your article addition. What 2 sub-topics do you think will most add to this article? Also, as you continue to work on this, do focus on quality rather than quantity. Last, be sure to reference your sources in the body of your work. If you do not reference a source, then you do not need to cite it. Rhirshorn (talk) 21:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Response to Peer Review

Thanks a lot for your comments. Its true that many will prefer online references so they could easily reach there for verification by way of a mouse click than rather driving to a library to go through the actual books themselves. Since I will be including journal articles references to the article I think it will serve the purpose of online references.

Thanks --Idrissou9cm (talk) 23:04, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]