Jump to content

User talk:Kikeasanza

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Hssengineering)

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello Hssengineering! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 08:55, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

October 2018

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Civil defense siren has been reverted.
Your edit here to Civil defense siren was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bN4_zdowDwM) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:55, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Hssengineering/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ——SerialNumber54129 13:05, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

[edit]
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. MER-C 13:20, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Kikeasanza (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

i am a private person, and i was using my company name i was trying to tell the history about my company no promotion, i need to tell in a better way the history next time, without promoting the company

Decline reason:

Your choice of username seems acceptable, but Wikipedia is not for merely telling about your company; that's something you should do on your company website. Please read WP:PROMO, WP:COI, and WP:PAID for important information. You won't be permitted to edit about your company. If you want to edit about a subject other than your company, you will need to state what that is. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:23, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not social media or other forum to merely tell about a company. As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia is only interested in what independent reliable sources with significant coverage state about a subject like a company, indicating how it is notable as Wikipedia defines it. In the case of a company, that is defined at WP:ORG. Wikipedia has no interest in what a company wants to say about itself. Because a company must meet the notability criteria to merit an article here, not every company merits an article here, even within the same field. Competitors having articles does not automatically mean your company merits one too. If you are just here to tell the world about your company, you won't be unblocked. 331dot (talk) 09:10, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you choose to make another unblock request, please place it outside of your block notice, by copying the coding from this screen to the edit window, instead of overwriting within the edit window. 331dot (talk) 09:24, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

[edit]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Kikeasanza (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

it is my personal name

Decline reason:

You have not addressed your inappropriate edits. You'll need to read and follow the instructions given if you wish to be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 13:15, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Kikeasanza (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

i need a better name

Decline reason:

a better one than that, certainly
I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please read Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations To be unblocked:

If you have no interest in editing Wikipedia beyond writing about your organisation, then you will not be unblocked. If this is the case, I recommend you consider alternative outlets.

I'm sorry that this message could not be more favourable.

-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:16, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

[edit]

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kikeasanza (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i have interest in editing Wikipedia, I dont want to talk about myself our my organization

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 12:27, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • I'd be willing to give you a second chance if it was done to me, but I think you need to work a bit better on providing a bit of a nicer unblock request, if you know what I mean? Foxnpichu (talk) 14:59, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I will not be reviewing this request, but whomever does will want to know what it is that you will edit about since you are agreeing to not edit about your organization. 331dot (talk) 11:26, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]