User talk:Hridith Sudev Nambiar
- Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia
- Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
- Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
- Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
- No edit warring or sock puppetry.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
- Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
- Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Dougweller (talk) 14:20, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
Your edits
[edit]In order to avoid edit warring changes of era need to follow the guideline at WP:ERA. I've reverted those changes. As you are new, there's no reason for you to have been aware of this. Dougweller (talk) 14:21, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
Edits to Oz books article
[edit]Your edits to List of Oz books has destroyed the table formatting of the table elements you disturbed. I doubt that was your intention. I have reverted your changes for now, but if you would like, you could go back and make your changes correctly this time (I assume you are an Oz expert, if not I wouldn't suggest making the kinds of changes you made). Be sure to always Preview your work before Saving, to prevent this kind of thing. It is also not necessary to Save multiple times while editing one article, instead the usual practice is to Preview your edits every so often while editing, then Save only once. Good luck. —Prhartcom (talk) 21:00, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
- Welcome, Hridith Sudev Nambiar, to Wikipedia, and I am glad to hear you are indeed an Oz expert—the project needs them. Please feel free to watch all the Oz articles and do anything you can to make any corrections to any problems you discover, write any improvements where needed, and apply consistency across them all, if you'd like. I am new to the Oz articles also but have a few years of editing experience. I plan to treat what is already edited there with respect (as so many editors have contributed) until I see good opportunities to help. Again, good luck! —Prhartcom (talk) 16:25, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Structure of List of Oz books
[edit]Hridith, can you please help me understand something about the List of Oz books: As I understand it from reading the article, the list of Oz books considered "Other Oz books", beyond those written by Baum, are classified into two categories:
- Orthodox Oz Sequels that were founded on L. Frank Baum's original canon
- Unorthodox Oz Sequels that do not follow L. Frank Baum's original canon
And I see in the first sub-section of the "Other Oz books" section, we have orthodox Oz sequels (by Ruth Plumly Thompson, etc). It is a well-written sub-section. But I am confused by the second through sixth sub-sections in this Other Books section, which of the two categories are they? Do they follow the canon or not? And do we really need so many sub-sections? How is one different from another? I am confused by the meaning of some of them, and these new titles are not helping (I would never use the word "sometimes" in the encyclopedia). Maybe this structuring of the sub-sections needs to be made more clear. What are your thoughts? —Prhartcom (talk) 03:56, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Percy Jackson.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Percy Jackson.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:53, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for December 5
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dike (mythology), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eirene. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi Hridith Sudev Nambiar! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 18:21, Wednesday, February 4, 2015 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
- Hi Hridith Sudev Nambiar! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 18:21, Wednesday, February 4, 2015 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Editor's Barnstar | |
Great contribs, man! I've done edits unlogged uptil now! Quite a lot to learn from you guys Wasco Fandom (talk) 19:14, 4 February 2015 (UTC) |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi Hridith Sudev Nambiar! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 11:00, Saturday, March 14, 2015 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi Hridith Sudev Nambiar! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 11:00, Saturday, March 14, 2015 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 12
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of oldest continuously inhabited cities, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kashi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 19
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kichadi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mustard. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Copy and pasting
[edit]We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. See also Wikipedia:Copy-paste. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to grant license. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:28, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
http://collider.com/harry-potter-jk-rowling-hogwarts-wizarding-schools/
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Hridith Sudev Nambiar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Hridith Sudev Nambiar. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
File:Indian Millets.png listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Indian Millets.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob13Talk 16:52, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Hridith Sudev Nambiar. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Please participate to the talk pages consultation
[edit]Hello
Our team at the Wikimedia Foundation is working on a project to improve the ease-of-use and productivity of wiki talk pages. As a Teahouse host, I can imagine you’ve run into challenges explaining talk pages to first-time participants.
We want all contributors to be able to talk to each other on the wikis – to ask questions, to resolve differences, to organize projects and to make decisions. Communication is essential for the depth and quality of our content, and the health of our communities. We're currently leading a global consultation on how to improve talk pages, and we're looking for people that can report on their experiences using (or helping other people to use) wiki talk pages. We'd like to invite you to participate in the consultation, and invite new users to join too.
We thank you in advance for your participation and your help.
Trizek (WMF), 08:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Please participate to the talk pages consultation - link update
[edit]The previous message about the talk pages consultation has a broken link.
The correct link has been misinterpreted by the MassMessage tool. Please use the following link: Wikipedia:Talk pages consultation 2019.
Sorry for the inconvenience, Trizek (WMF), 08:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Happy Birthday!
[edit]Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan
[edit]Dear @Hridith Sudev Nambiar:Hridith Sudev Nambiar, Thanks for adding information for Komala, but what you added those are not true! The Komala is a social democrat party, fighting for federalism since 2000 Your views are for Komala from CPI KOMALAH The following link is theirs, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Komalah_(CPI)[1] I hope you can correct it
{{pp-protect}} {{distinguish}} {{Coord}}
Thanks a lotKak kayvan (talk) 07:25, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Project GreenWorld International for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project GreenWorld International until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
DGG ( talk ) 16:47, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Project GreenWorld International.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Project GreenWorld International.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 16 May 2021 (UTC)