User talk:HoLeeFk

Welcome!

Hello, HoLeeFk, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Category:Jewish war crimes, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! HoLeeFk (talk) 17:02, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Jewish war crimes

A tag has been placed on Category:Jewish war crimes indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. HoLeeFk (talk) 17:02, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blank edit requests

Please stop opening blank edit requests. Per the edit request template, This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y". ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:29, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am only adding the category. If you didn't notice, the Koniuchy article is protected and I am not able to do it by myself. There is a huge blue button, where I can add changes to the article. On the category page, that I have created, you added that big banner, where it says "If you know of pages which are appropriate for this category, please populate it and remove this notice." And when I do exacxt what it tells me to do, you reject it for personal reasons. Wikipedia is intended to help provide free access to objective knowledge. You are refusing it. What's your explanation? HoLeeFk (talk) 17:53, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! HoLeeFk, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:18, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane, and suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page.

Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:12, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HoLeeFk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block was just a pathetic attempt to silence me, because I am not scared of making jewish crimes druing WW2 public and accessible for everyone, who is interested in facts regarding the situation in Soviet-occupied Eastern Poland during WW2. The instant attempts to remove everything I was working on proves me right. Bigotry and hatred are the main reasons here. My name was fine all the time, until I dared to make something public, that the majority of the bigoted editors were trying to hide from the public. The fact, that a jewish editor is banning me, is proving how biased you are. You can't challenge nor deny the facts I am providing, so you retreat into something so pathetic. This has nothing to do with a free and objective encyclopedia; this is pure censorship.

Decline reason:

That you got away with your username for awhile does not mean that its blocking is connected to your edits, only that someone noticed the name once you started editing in the last month; only editing makes a username visible. That said, I am declining this request because you seem to be not here to contribute and collaborate, but to make Wikipedia a battleground for your views. If you want to tell the world about your views, you will have to do that on another platform; private entities are not obliged to provide you with a forum to express your views, just as you are free to decide what it is said and done within the four walls of your residence. See WP:FREESPEECH. 331dot (talk) 11:21, 19 November 2021 (UTC) 331dot (talk) 11:21, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Don't need Judeophobes here. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:51, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I will further note that Wikipedia does not claim to be unbiased, as everyone has biases, including you and me. Wikipedia only claims that the information here can be verified, see WP:TRUTH. Any bias in sources will be reflected in Wikipedia. The sources are presented to readers so they can evaluate and judge them for themselves as to bias. We don't ask for anyone's blind trust here. 331dot (talk) 11:29, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: My views? The Koniuchy massacre is also only my view? Even tho it is on the wikipedia already? What kind of an excuse is this? That's hypocrisy. I have books, sources and reports with documented war crimes, which you are ignoring and instantely refusing to acknowledge. Just because you don't want to hear about it and it's against your believes, doesn't mean, that these are "my views". It's the historical truth, that you are trying to censor. That's a fact and you just proved it

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

HoLeeFk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

XHoLeeX (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

My views? The Koniuchy massacre is also only my view? Even tho it is on the wikipedia already? What kind of an excuse is this? That's hypocrisy. I have books, sources and reports with documented war crimes, which you are ignoring and instantely refusing to acknowledge. Just because you don't want to hear about it and it's against your believes, doesn't mean, that these are "my views". It's the historical truth, that you are trying to censor. That's a fact and you just proved it. HoLeeFk (talk) 11:37, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is a rant rather than an unblock request. Yamla (talk) 14:11, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No need to duplicate your post.. I didn't say it was only your view. I didn't say that your views were the reason for my decline. It's the battleground attitude. If you show an interest in collaboration and consensus, I have no problem with you being unblocked. In any event, it is no longer up to me, someone else will review your request. 331dot (talk) 11:45, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot:Battleground attitude? Excuse me? I was working on articles and created a new category to put everything together and got instantly attacked by biased editors and on top of that I got blocked by a jewish editor, just because he doesn't like what I do. His behavior is battleground attitude. Not mine. I am not the reason, why the Koniuchy massacre commited by Jewish partisans article is in a protected mode. It's people like him, who try to censor specifis content and that's what you call a "battleground attitude".

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

HoLeeFk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

XHoLeeX (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I have been blocked only because a biased jewish editor didn't like what I was working on. I repeat, the Koniuchy massacre article already states, that Jewish partisans commited a war crime in Poland. Silencing me won't make these crimes disappear. HoLeeFk (talk) 14:19, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Revocation of user's talk page access means this request is moot. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:19, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked

Your continued personal attacks have earned you the revocation of your talk page. WP:UTRS shows you how to contest your block if your current unblock request is declined, as I expect it will be. --Yamla (talk) 15:12, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 51100

UTRS appeal #51100 has been closed. Renamer note: Would be happy to rename if suitable new name presented. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:09, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note Noting account attached 2016-05-10, but first ENWIKI edit was 2021-10-17. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:12, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]