User talk:Himkdm

Himkdm, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Himkdm! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Unexplained removal

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Counterman v. Colorado, you may be blocked from editing. Jade Ten (talk) 15:38, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I made good edits to that totally biased and uninformative section. No need to block me, oh Wikipedia legal articles gatekeeper. What an arrogant person you are. People like you are ruining Wikipedia. What makes you so awfully important anyway? Go get a life. Himkdm (talk) 17:28, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear lovely and wonderful leader of Wikipedia Jade Ten, here is an explanation on the talk page as per your dictate:

I removed a poorly written section that regurgitated quotations from a Vanity Fair article and called itself "reactions". Some self-important editor named Jade Ten sent me a threat for doing so. Here is my explanation: these "reactions" are irrelevant. One "reaction" called a person a "survivor of cyberbullying". Does anyone want to be quoted as an authority because of this? Also, who isn't a "survivor of cyberbullying"? I was cyberbullied by Wikipedia editor Jade Ten just today... and I survived! Himkdm (talk) 17:44, 20 July 2023 (UTC) Himkdm (talk) 17:46, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear leader of Wikipedia, he or she who controls so much of the world:

You list the Economist magazine as a reliable source. Take a look at the article "Who really runs Wikipedia?" (May 6, 2013). It explains that, "Administrators have a big technical stick to ensure that when "edit wars" erupt or inappropriate changes are continuously applied, they can prod or truncheon users. Users may be banned or put under strictures, while administrators themselves can have their actions overridden by any of the 41 demiurges known as "stewards", a 12-member Olympian arbitration counsel, or the site's founder and chief deity, Jimmy Wales."

Anyway, I don't respect you or your power. Himkdm (talk) 18:09, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear leader of the world, I just complained about your threat to the stewards. I'm asking them not to let you make any decisions regarding my account. I deserve an apology from you. Please don't respond with anything else to me. Himkdm (talk) 18:39, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, loser! I just heard back from the stewards about you! You are a nobody. Here's what they say about you, bubba:

"That user ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/Jade_Ten ) has no special access to accounts and is not able to make blocks or locks. They may provide guidance and warnings to other users, just as everyone can, and refer users to local administrators for additional decisions.

Yours sincerely,

Shaemous Flocks"

You can't do anything to anyone. You suck at writing and you are a delusional cyberbully. Himkdm (talk) 19:57, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:16, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]