User talk:HelloPak

Welcome!

Hello, HelloPak, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Rosiestep (talk) 00:10, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! thank you @Rosiestep for cookies. I love cookies, but i can't eat them now, as I'm fasting. Thank you once again... I'll surely ask you for help... HelloPak (talk) 00:25, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HelloPak, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi HelloPak! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, I'll be there... HelloPak (talk) 16:40, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Detained International NGO (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Detained International, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Detained International NGO and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Detained International NGO, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 09:27, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Detained International NGO moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Detained International NGO, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. YODADICAE👽 13:56, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Truck it in moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Truck it in, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. YODADICAE👽 16:26, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Truck it in for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Truck it in is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Truck it in until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

YODADICAE👽 17:05, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello HelloPak. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:HelloPak. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=HelloPak|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. YODADICAE👽 17:21, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Praxidicae. I'm neither directly nor indirectly being compensated for my edits. Which you also agreed by moving Truck it in to draft:Truck it in without tagging it with undisclosed paid template. But the nature of your edits gives an impression of being bullied & irritated by message on your talk page.

You've placed an undisclosed paid edits tag on my Article Truck it in, so I'll love to see you providing an evidence of it instead of talking nonsense allegation. HelloPak (talk) 18:22, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have evidence to the contrary and have sent it to arbcom. YODADICAE👽 18:25, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Zainalee per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zainalee. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 20:04, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason= I don't know what's going on. Why I'm being blocked by Wikipedia. Why I'm being called as user Zanalee? I don't know anything, But I'm damn sure it's going to benefit Praxidicae in our discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Truck it in. He clearly took my Action of reverting his edits very personal. Firstly, he tagged my Article with undisclosed paid tag. & Now I'm being blocked to defend my Article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Truck it in. Wel done senior wikipedians for your collective suppression of new editors, who have dare to challenge your wrong decisions. I think, now I should use someone else's mobile to defend my Article in discussion. User:Praxidicae, you know worst thing of me is, I never Quit. I'll try my best to prove that my Article was worthy to be on Wikipedia Articlespace, & your move was nothing but arrogance. Mz7 you did a great job of protecting interests of your fellow senior wikipedian User:Praxidicae. Thank you. HelloPak (talk) 20:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deosai National Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Astore. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]