User talk:Hastywarrior123

October 2013

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. JNW (talk) 16:38, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also of concern is the appearance of WP:MULTIPLE accounts editing this article. JNW (talk) 16:38, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. The sources have already been added and please do not add things that are not constructive. We appreciate that thank you.

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. JNW (talk) 16:45, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. JNW (talk) 16:57, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:52, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop leaving JNW warnings

Please stop leaving JNW warnings on their User Talk page. Users like JNW are allowed to remove such warnings, and restoring such warnings appears to be harassment. I understand that you may be upset about the YiLing Goh article, but it has been determined that subject doesn't meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion at this time. Although it is understandable you are upset, you cannot harass other editors with warnings. If you continue to replace those warnings, I will block you to prevent you from misusing your editing privileges further. Zad68 18:01, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Immaculatefancy (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:28, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]