Jump to content

User talk:Halosean

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Halosean/Archives)


  1. User talk:Halosean/Archives/May 2008 Yay, soon going to be unblocked2008/May
  2. User talk:Halosean/Archives/May 2008 Yay, soon going to be unblocked2008/June
  3. User talk:Halosean/Archives/May 2008 Yay, soon going to be unblocked2008/July




Hi guys erm.....Can someone put huggle on my account for me?... -.-

According to wp:Huggle you need to download it yourself as it's a programme, rather than an add-on like twinkle. I don't use it, but that seems to be the way it works. Fribbler (talk) 01:58, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Halosean (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

WTF? What the heck did I do? I just found my password, and WAMMM this happens!

Decline reason:

I can't see evidence that your account exists for any reason other than spamming user talk pages with a link to an external site. Your unblock request doesn't offer strong reason to believe that unblocking this account would result in a better encyclopedia. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:34, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Looking at these edits, advertising for another site like that does not appear to be appropriate (see WP:CANVAS or WP:SPAM); however, I'm not sure that this was discussed with you, before you were blocked. As far as the prior block, you still seem to be issuing vandalism warnings that don't necessarily reflect policy or common practice -- I know this has been said before, but you may want to use the warnings listed at WP:WARN. I believe the repeated advertising for another site is more block-worthy, though. Would you agree to stop that? – Luna Santin (talk) 23:26, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Halosean (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I do not do that! Look at ALL of my contribs, not just the frigging one that is vandalised. See a difference retard? Look like vandalisim to you? If so you have no friggin life.

Decline reason:

Abusive unblock request. Page protected to prevent further disruption. —  Sandstein  18:29, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


Finally I am unblocked


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Halosean (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Just ban this account all together, I am going to make an account for my brother

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you want this account to go away, I'm happy to block you. Mangojuicetalk 18:49, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


No thank you


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Halosean (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I changed my mind, unblock me please

Decline reason:

If you're really serious about editing open another account and don't come anywhere near this page again. As it is you seem to be trolling, and I'm just gonna protect this page so that it stops now. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:43, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Image:Lolcat.gif listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Lolcat.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 12:06, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Funny-pictures-black-cat-invisible-text-message-breakup.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Funny-pictures-black-cat-invisible-text-message-breakup.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 06:27, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Funny-cat-pictures-panicked-black-cat-head-cone-floor.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Funny-cat-pictures-panicked-black-cat-head-cone-floor.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 06:27, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Funnny-pictures-cornered-mouse-meows.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Funnny-pictures-cornered-mouse-meows.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 06:27, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Funny-pictures-black-cat-missed-litterbox.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Funny-pictures-black-cat-missed-litterbox.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 06:30, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]