It was really helpful of you to you to upload File:FuisteTu-Arjona cover.jpg. However, we need to properly format the image license information in order to keep and use new images.
Hello Hahc21! I've noticed your work article related to Latin American music. I would like to invite you to the Latin American music task force a collaborative effort which aims to create, expand, and maintain Latin American music-related articles. If you'd like to join, please sign up here. Thank you. Erick (talk) 06:22, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations, Hahc21, you've recently made your 1,000th edit to articles on English Wikipedia!
Thank you for improving and expanding articles on Latin American music, and for all your contributions to the encyclopedia. Keep up the great work! :) Maryana (WMF) (talk) 20:19, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I asked the changes to be written on the talk page to see in where i made mistakes or to have a guide for future edits on the article. That's the main reason... And most of all to document the copy-edit process, for future reference. =) --Hahc21 (talk) 18:28, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(I copied your reply back here, as I prefer to keep things threaded. It's too confusing to jump between talk pages during one conversation.) You're asking the copy editor, not merely to do a copy edit, but to write an explanation of the copy edit. Five times as much work and no benefit to the article. In a normal copy edit, the process is documented in the article history file, from which you can extract the diffs. If you want clarification of anything, you can then ask the copy editor for it on their talk page. I will adjust your request to advise the copy editor to proceed in the usual way. Rgds, --Stfg (talk) 13:27, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. I didn't thought it was such a hard work docummenting the process. Thanks for taking a moment of your time to explain me this. =)--Hahc21 (talk) 00:16, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The copyedit you carried out on WFN Stategies is truly awful. You have made a staggering number of mistakes for such a short article. You are not sufficiently proficient in English to carry out this task, as is made quite clear every time you post to a talk page. Please recuse yourself from this task, which is really not suitable for you. SpinningSpark13:59, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker)Spinningspark, with respect, that comment was over the top. The article was dreadful to begin with and, although Hahc21 made some mistakes, the net effect of his c/e was an improvement.
Hahc21, you did make some mistakes in the English, for example in replacing correct prepositions with wrong ones. Would I be right in guessing that English is not your native language? --Stfg (talk) 14:28, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unlinking Telecoms Engineering. Although a redlink, it is obviously an article which should exist and should be redlinked per WP:REDLINK
Changing the plural form to the singular Telecom Engineering. The plural form is accepted as a correct form in the field and the title of the subject article is, in fact, telecommunications engineering.
Failure to spot the one thing that was actually wrong here, the breach of MOS:CAP and perpetuating that error.
"...supplier of...services on the government..."
"oil and gas" is a single sector, so if the ampersand is replaced by "and" then another "and" with a serial comma is required after "commercial". I humbly suggest that the original ampersand was less confusing than the copyedit.
"WFN is also specialized on..." wrong preposition
"also" was added by the copyedit. As well as what?
The verb tense has incorrectly been changed.
"cable line" does not mean the same as "optical cable". "Line" is usually taken to mean copper lines if not explicitly stated.
"tecnologies". Copyedit has replaced a correct spelling with an incorrect one.
"...is also specialized on....among others." Agreement problem caused by copyedit.
The copyedit has also removed the information that the list is (or partially is) wireless technologies.
"...the first electronic and dedicated magazine..." Dedicated to what?
The statement about the RSS feed has been removed. Possibly this does not belong, but it is not a copyediting issue and should have been included in the edit summary or a separate edit.
"...is also published by WFN." What else does the article claim they have published?
{{reflist|3}} is a poor thing for a copyeditor to do - it is assuming that the article will be rendered on everyone elses screen as it is on the copyeditor's.
That's 18 mistakes in an article consisting of only five sentences of readable prose. I agree this was not a good article, but besides some trivial removal of whitespace, in what way was it improved by this "copyedit"? SpinningSpark16:09, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for taking my harsh comments so well. Your paper qualifications are not really relevant here on Wikipedia. Why don't you stick to article creation? You are doing really well expanding poorly represented areas on the English Wikipedia. You don't need to be mentoring other editors. SpinningSpark09:15, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You're right. I think i do better creating articles where needed, and reviewing GANs. Copyediting is a task that needs so much effort and dedication, and i'm not able to give both properly now. I'll still keep mentoring when somebody needs it, i think, as of what i've seen, i've made good works on that. --Hahc21 (talk) 14:50, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File permission problem with File:Gravity Bone start logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Gravity Bone start logo.jpg, which you've sourced to (screenshot). I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk)14:11, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I wrote a review on the talk page for Independiente (Ricardo Arjona album) detailing on what it needs. I do not think the article will pass GAN at its current state, so my suggestion would be to withdraw for now and request for a peer review here. Erick (talk) 21:41, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, although I doubt there would be much that needs to be said once it's peer reviews since it's done by an expert reviewer. Thanks for the support. ;)Erick (talk) 19:21, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Alternatively, not case I'm not available, there is another user Basilisk4u may be of help for reviews. She is also part of the task force and has done work on Latin music herself. Erick (talk) 19:36, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I really appreciate your help. I work a lot on latin music articles and create around 20+ new articles per month (not stubs), but i can't review my own articles. And, additionally, the reviewer needs to speak spanish and that's a limitation. I'll be in touch =) --Hahc21 (talk) 19:41, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:5topisotour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have questions, please post them here.
I will automatically remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please ask an admin to turn it off here.
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Arjona sin ti sin mi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Wisin & Yandel - Follow the Leader.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Honestly, I only contributed some to this article's reception section/reviews. Revisiting it now, it looks pretty different from last time I saw it. Dan56 (talk) 23:20, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well. The article needs a lot of work to become a GA. Just like happened with an article a nominated, Independiente (Ricardo Arjona album), i had to withdraw the nomination after another user told me the article wasn't ready yet. And i feel Otis Blue isn't ready. --Hahc21 (talk) 00:16, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Why didn't you send me a notice on my talk page that you put the article on hold? Do you know about this template? I could have easily solve the nitpicky comments if you would have given me some time. Also I worked on other articles and was generally busy in real life.--GoPTCN12:31, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hey! Sorry for the wait. There's still a lot of work to do in the article. A major overhaul cannot be done (or should not be done) during the review process. I'd be glad to help you out on all the issues i detected on that article and on The Great Otis Redding Sings Soul Ballads which i'm also reviewing and you nominated and i will make the reassessment by myself. --Hahc21 (talk) 18:35, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Hahc21. You have started to initiate a GAR review of Daddy Yankee, but have not completed it. You need to choose whether you want to conduct an individual reassessment or a community one by clickink on the appropriate link and then add your reason why you no longer think it is a good article. The criteria are quite low and to get it delisted you need to show that it doesn't meet one or more of them. Regards AIRcorn(talk)14:15, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Rihanna Bad Girl.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Logo-gira-metamorfosis2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Thanks for contributing, but I undid your copy edit on The Kane Chronicles, because it added grammatical errors. I recommend that you brush up on your sentence construction, particularly in regard to having agreement between verb tenses. If you were trying to clean it up because of the notice that it's in need of editing, please be advised that the remaining sections that need editing are farther down the page, and may in fact be finished by the time you read this. Dementia13 (talk) 03:45, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
An article about an song must meet one of the three criteria in order to have an article: It ranked on a national chart, it has been covered by multiple artists and the covers themselves must also be notable, and/or the song must have won a significant award or honor. Song articles without any of these criteria generally fail WP:NSONGS and are either redirect to the parent album or nominated for deletion. Erick (talk) 23:17, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I know. I now the criteria. Are you talking about Mi Novia Se Me Está Poniendo Vieja?. It actually is the only song which article i have created and didn't charted. I was thinking about deleting the article if it does not chart within the next few weeks. --Hahc21 (talk) 02:24, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You can just simply redirect the song article to Independiente, but the one I was referring to was "Hoy Me Voy" by Juanes. BTW, Basilisk4u left a message on her talk page for you, just in case you didn't saw. Cheers, Erick (talk) 03:01, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Mmm yes. I forgot that one. You're right. What happened ther is that after i was finishing the article, i tought i will find information regarding chart history, but i didn't. And thanks, i didn't notices Basilisk answered me =). --Hahc21 (talk) 03:11, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Juanes Hoy Me Voy 2012.jpg
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Juanes Hoy Me Voy 2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hello, Razr Nation. You have new messages at Talk:Ricardo Arjona/GA1. Message added 22:20, 16 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Mi Novia Se Me Esta Poniendo Vieja Arjona.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hello, Razr Nation. You have new messages at Talk:Dinosaur (Kesha song)/GA1. Message added 17:35, 19 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hi, I removed the speedy at Cat Daddy because I think it isn't eligible for speedy deletion as an assertion of importance/significance is present. If you still feel the article should be deleted, please take it to AfD. Jarkeld (talk) 23:52, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Casa de mi Padre song.jpg listed for deletion
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
Hi there, I'm asking if you can review the Age Of Empires Online article for GA rating. I feel that this article may have what it takes to become a GA article but even if you disagree and say that it doesn't, then at least it will help the article's editors see what parts need fixing, correcting, etc. Thanks, KnowledgeFreak7 (talk) 03:18, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've reached 10 reviewed articles and i want to look back to my reviews to see how good was my performance as a reviewer, and polish my process. Of course, if anyone wants to ask me to review an article, i'm still open to review, but i will take my time. Instead of a fully loaded 2-day intensive review, I'll go with the 5-to-7 and 7-to-14 days of slowed down review. I'll also ask for comments to all the nominators of the articles i've reviewed to see what they think of the way I review articles.
Hi! Thanks for patrolling new pages. You recently tagged this page for deletion as having no asserted importance when the article was about a person who was significant in the Three Kingdoms period of chinese history, and as such I have removed the tag. Thanks, →Bmusician09:59, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Hahc21. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Lock (monster), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. — Malik ShabazzTalk/Stalk18:40, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Hahc21. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Swimming South Africa, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. — Malik ShabazzTalk/Stalk18:41, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Hahc21. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of AEGEE-Yerevan, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. — Malik ShabazzTalk/Stalk19:23, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think this was a bit excessive. To be sure the article needs better references, but its lead properly summarizes the topic, and the original version may well have suffered from an improper tone, but I worked pretty hate to clean that up. As for notability, if you search for the term you'll find it's a fairly widespread concept among ham operators. I don't understand the neutrality issue at all -- what about the article is non-neutral? WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!!20:07, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Hahc21. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Rumble Sports, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims coverage in reliable sources. Thank you. — Malik ShabazzTalk/Stalk04:25, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Hahc21. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Mwanawina II, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. — Malik ShabazzTalk/Stalk21:27, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You seem to have a large percentage of your AfDs that you end up withdrawing. I suggest you stop nominations for a while. Study up on WP:N and participate in other deletion discussions until you gain a better sense of what is likely to be deleted and not a waste of everyone's time to nominate. Please also realize that incorrect nominations can be quite WP:BITEy and discouraging to new editors who are actually doing good work. LadyofShalott22:59, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the comment. What happened is that some articles have been abandoned without completion and they do not meet the guidelines. When I nominated them, contributors arise and edit the article to meet the guideline. --Hahc21[TALK][CONTRIBS]23:02, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That is not the purpose of AfD. It is not "Articles that need more work". It is where you nominate articles that you don't believe can be made proper. Please see WP:NOTCLEANUP. With The Vampire (novella), you explictly stated in your nomination that it looked notable - that means you should not nominate it. LadyofShalott23:12, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I understand. Thanks! As i like to patroll new articles, i will dedicate myself to only tag them if needed instead of proposing them for deletion. Regards. --Hahc21[TALK][CONTRIBS]23:27, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Hahc21. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Falconimorphae, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not about an individual animal, so it doesn't qualify for speedy deletion under WP:CSD#A7. Thank you. — Malik ShabazzTalk/Stalk03:14, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I'm concerned by the large number of AfDs that you're submitting. For example, in only thirteen minutes on May 27th, you posted eight AfDs (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8). I don't see how you could possibly have done due diligence on so many articles in such a short time. Please note that you should not AfD an article just because it is unsourced or badly sourced. You are expected, to the best of your ability, to verify before posting an AfD that there are not enough sources to establish notability. That is, the criterion is not that the article doesn't mention any good sources: the criterion is that no good sources are believed exist. The fact that people have posted nine suggestions of sources for Raymond Kevorkian suggests strongly that you did not make sufficient attempts to find sources on your own in the minute that passed between your previous AfD and that one.
The purpose of AfD is not to encourage people to improve a poor article: WP:NOTCLEANUP. The purpose of AfD is to remove articles that can never be made good because no sources exist. Nominating articles to impose a false time-limit for improvement is disruptive, even if done in good faith. Please do not do it. Dricherby (talk) 20:12, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Some creators feel they can avoid the speedy deletion with just removing the tag, which is permitted. I felt it was better if a normal proposal was made. --Hahc21[TALK][CONTRIBS]14:49, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, article creators may not remove a speedy deletion tag (that is considered vandalism, please review the speedy deletion process). Only third-party editors may remove a speedy deletion tag, if they feel that the tag was placed in error. By taking this to AFD, you have only allowed a blatant hoax to remain for seven days rather than be speedily deleted. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!!14:52, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Three days ago a hoax was speedy nominated and then the articel creator deleted the tag, which resulted on the article being taken to AfD. I see no reason why this would happen again. I'll ask an administrator to take care of it. --Hahc21[TALK][CONTRIBS]14:54, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If an article creator deletes a speedy deletion tag, you are free to revert this edit as vandalism, and warn the creator. There is even a specific warning template for this purpose: {{uw-speedy}}. The creator is asked instead to contest the deletion on the article's talk page. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!!14:58, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The only reason to remove a speedy delete to create an AfD is if you feel that discussion is needed before the article is deleted. Otherwise, let the speedy run its course. If somebody removes the speedy tag but you still think the article should be deleted, then AfD it. Dricherby (talk) 22:10, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry but there was no way that was going to survive, WP:SNOWBALL applies here. And yes, creators of articles are usually not allowed to remove speedy tags from them, only if the tag was placed there in bad faith or a similar situation. - filelakeshoe15:52, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Hahc21! Just thought you should know that I created the article for Monitor Latino. I'm also thinking of adding the other charts (Ingles and Pop) as well on charts and maybe even number-one singles categories as well. Thoughts? Erick (talk) 17:38, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've been thinking about it too. As i was developing the template {{albumchart}} i came across the idea of adding latin charts. I created the Record Report from VZLA (I created the redirect page Venezuelan Singles Chart) and was pursuing the Colombian charts... About the No.1 singles it's a very good idea, but 1 question: No.1 for each chart of as a global latin field? --Hahc21[TALK][CONTRIBS]18:57, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, when I created the article and categories for Record Report, I did the same Monitor Latino. As for singlechart template The only problem of course, is that they lack a searchable database which is literally the only thing keeping them from being listed on GOODCHARTS. Fortunately, thanks to WebCitation, this has helped out with verification. Right now, I've been adding #1 Monitor Latino Top Ingles songs from Google news archive. I didn't get what you said on the last sentence. Erick (talk) 19:04, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've been doing the same with ML on some articles, most of all from Ricardo Arjona. What i said is that, when creating the categories for number-one singles, would it be better to create a category for each of the charts or a category fo all No.1 songs on any latin chart? (A debate about this but for albums is being held at the Wikiproject Albums talk page...) --Hahc21[TALK][CONTRIBS]19:07, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Wow good job! It is amazing. I like it. Hey i've been thinking: Record Report issues the new charts each Saturday. A method to auto-archive the page each sunday can be used? Does it exist? I'll be searching for it. With that method, we can solve many issues. --Hahc21[TALK][CONTRIBS]19:15, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yeah, about the Colombian chart, do you mean the National-Report chart? The article for it got deleted because it's methodology for charting is not referenced. Erick (talk) 19:22, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah i thought about that chart until i saw its name on BADCHARTS. Also, i haven't found a Chilean reliable chart, or a Paraguayan or a Bolivian or a Peruvian... =( --Hahc21[TALK][CONTRIBS]19:29, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well if a source about its methodology can be found, it can probably be reversed. It is regrettable that there aren't many Latin American charts to be found. Erick (talk) 19:32, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah :(... I'll check to see if the metodology can be found. Hey! I need your help. I need to write a bot to do only this:
You can do bot requests here. That would be very helpful so we don't have to do it all the time. Hope you cand find the methodology too. Erick (talk) 19:48, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There's another favor I would like to ask of you. My friend Jaespinoza created the article for Inolvidable (song) and he sources a book that mentions the song being #1 in Mexico and I'm trying to find out where the book got this information from. It can't be Monitor Latino because it started in 2003, so I think it's likely that Mexico had a different company that did a singles chart before it went defunct. This is the book he sourced and this to be honest, my Spanish isn't exactly fluent. Erick (talk) 20:27, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've read it. On page 70, it says "Luis Miguel was the first to be amazed when his ballad disc sold 1.5 million copies in two months. The ballads 'Inolvidable' and 'No Sé Tú' stayed six months on the first places of popularity." Nothing else is said about commercial performance of the song. Is that what you've been looking for? =) --Hahc21[TALK][CONTRIBS]20:42, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I was looking for the reference in the book where it got if rom. On the same sentence you posted, it lists (Época, núm. 78,77) as its reference and that's what I'm looking for. This might help out singles that charted in Mexico in the 1990s and maybe before. Erick (talk) 20:49, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Man i was unable to find nothing to date. I'll keep searching, but that mexican newspaper named Época seems to have the website shut down and Google Books doesn't have the issue No.78. --Hahc21[TALK][CONTRIBS]22:44, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It's alright. It looks someone would have to own a physical copy of the Epoca issues to verify the information and I doubted they would be easy to find. Erick (talk) 22:57, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Wait a minute didn't he say "Link #10 is the one". I think that's the kind of methodology that was needed to explain how they do charts. Erick (talk) 02:13, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes but he wrote after that:"I'm kind of tired right now, so I'll do a thing when I'm more coherent and stuff." which i didn't undesrtood. Or he wrote terribly wrong or i'm bad with my english... --Hahc21[TALK][CONTRIBS]02:19, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Emotion!) I read you response on your TP. I will write an email to them asking them how they craft the data. Even when i know it is not reliable for WP, i would serve as a guide, i think. --Hahc21[TALK][CONTRIBS]02:33, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
True, but the suggestion was posted before I read TPH saying that Link #10 is the one. So Link #10 mentions the important stuff right? Anything I should know what it says that wasn't said already? Erick (talk) 02:42, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No.10 says exactly how NR crafts its data and how such data is distributed to specific contractors. Just as Nielsen Soundscan does with Billboard. --Hahc21[TALK][CONTRIBS]03:05, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Yeah! e broke the ground for NR and RR. With my last comment, i think i did the last strike to reach Verifiability of those charts. --Hahc21[TALK][CONTRIBS]03:12, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oooh, really want to sharpen your review skills eh? That's good to hear! Man, I'm just glad we were able to show how National-Report was a reliable source. It's been a busy day for me in Wikipedia today! The Colombian charts, working on No Me Ames with Status, and adding Mexican charts. Next Saturday, I'm going on a cruise to Central America so I'll gone for a week. Erick (talk) 03:28, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Good man XD I'm in the middle of classes at my college so no travel for me XD I hope you enjoy XD Hey and when working on album articles, don't forget to use {{Albumchart}} on them! XD I was busy those past days working on that template from scratch and i'm glad it is finished by now :) Also, i've reached 5,000 edits and entered the top 10,000! XD --Hahc21[TALK][CONTRIBS]03:33, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I will for my next big project (Mi Tierra by Gloria Estefan for my second FA). I forgot to tell you. It's thanks to you and Basilisk4u that Romances was able to become the first Spanish-language album to be FA. Congrats on your edit count! Erick (talk) 03:40, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Wow! I want to help you on that album =) Hey if you need help on any chart info or related to it, you can tell me. I'd be more than greteful to help you out on anything you need =) And congrats for your FA. I'm still waiting to get my first GA woth Ricardo Arjona haha XD --Hahc21[TALK][CONTRIBS]03:42, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cool! Here's the sandbox. I'm still on my research phase where I put useful links in the notes before I get into the meat of the article. Yeah, the PR is takes long especially when you have a Spanish-language article, but it's worth it. I'm sure you'll be one of the finest GA article contributors here and I'm really hoping it helps the Latin music task force grow. Cheers, Erick (talk) 03:48, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I, on the other hand, am going to call it a night. I might do some few edits on misc. articles, but I'm deadbeat from today. Thanks again, Erick (talk) 03:55, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You need to read up on the wikipedia notability guidelines for astronomical objects. Any star that is visible with the naked eye (Mu Canis Majoris is at 5 magnitude), or has an HR designation (appearing in the Yale Bright Star Catalogue), is notable. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bright_Star_Catalogue. Mu Canis Majoris not only meets these references, it exceeds them, as it also has a Bayer designation, too. The Bright Star Catalogue is larger than Bayer's Uranometria by a factor of about 2. If you had done a google search, you would also see that the French and Italian wikipedias have articles on the star. Benkenobi18 (talk) 08:19, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hey! No, i didn't found any other issue. I just wanted to ask... And the background section? I'm not saying it is required, it's just a personal question (outside GA). --Hahc21[TALK][CONTRIBS]15:48, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations on your GA for "Somebody That I Used to Know". You've made a mighty effort in getting it up to a suitable standard – well done, mate!shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 21:18, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations Hahc! Great work on the article! I'd also like to thank you for your contributions to GAN! Best, — Statυs (talk) 00:00, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for adding the set list source. I was just looking for it like a crazy person! Also thanks for the links for Como. I will look later; right now I'm focused on "Me Haces Falta". If you can find anything else about the music video or the performance of the song it would be great! I literally cannot find anything else, and I know you know Spanish, so you could translate some stuff. — Statυs (talk) 08:02, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please answer these questions about Vandalism let me know when you are done. You don't need to give a long answer. Thanks!
1. Please briefly describe what vandalism is.
Is any edit (addition, removal) of content which does not benefit Wikipedia and is made on a deliberate way, not unintentionally. Y
2. Am I allowed to get in an edit war while reverting vandalism?
No, you are not allowed, since it will only increse the vandalism. N It says "Edit warring over content is not vandalism."
3. What should I do after I spot vandalism? (3 steps)
a)Revert the vandalism. Y
b)Inform the user on its talk page. Y
c)Watch the page. Y Really, if the vandalism persists, you should report the vandal, but Watching the page is good enough.
When you say "after i spot", you mean after i assessed the information as vandalism, or before? After you identified the edit as vandalism.
4. Please list 3 ways how to spot vandalism.
a) Using the recent changes link. Y
b) Constantly checking the Wachlist (shich i do every 10 min XD) Y
c) Checking the edit history of a page Y
If i may, i would like to add: 4) verifiyng the new pages and checking thos which are not patrolled; 5) checking minor edits and edits made prior to minor edits (mainly for those not made by bots) =)
5. If an entire article is vandalism, what should you do?
Wow although i missunderstood No.2 . I thought it said that if i was allowed to get into an edit warring with the user who is the author of the vandalism... --Hahc21[TALK][CONTRIBS]21:40, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Next, please read WP:Cleaning up vandalism and WP: WARN or the section in WP:VANDAL that talks about warnings and let me know when you are done. Also, your initial RFR was denied because you did not have any anti-vandalism experience, so after you read these pages, you should start reverting vandalism. I would recommend using Twinkle to revert vandalism. This can be done by enabling Twinkle in your options. You will also get links that let you "Rollback edits". This is different from the rollback that you are trying to get (which can only be granted by an Administrator). Please leave me a message on my talk page when you are done reading these 2 articles. Thanks! Electriccatfish2 (talk) 22:26, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. I already use Twinkle and have the rollback feature activated (the one from my preferences). I'm going to study for my exam. I'll read them later. Regards. --Hahc21[TALK][CONTRIBS]22:30, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not edit {{singlechart}} live. Make a private copy, test your changes, and then edit the live version. Every time you make one of these one or two character edits (or add a dummy country like "Germany2", every article that uses singlechart gets purged and reformatted. Very expensive, very wasteful, and a single screwup can cause a lot of problems. That's why I have User:Kww/singlechart and use User talk:Kww/singlechart as a test area.—Kww(talk) 22:59, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Me being annoying again, could you finish this off for me from the album booklet? Lyrics and music are separate in the booklet, so they should be on here too. Statυs (talk) 21:56, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I am also in school and am studying for Finals and Regents. I am done now, and here's your test. Thanks for the prompt response! By the way, many vandal-fighters on Wikipedia are teenagers, including the instructors at the CVUA.
1. Why should new users be given level 1 warnings when possible?
When their edits are considered to be good-faith, but falling into vandalism or disruptive editing. NWhy, not When. New users may be offended by being called a "vandal", and level 1 doesn't mention the word "vandal" or "vandalism".
2. What level(s), if vandalism persists after the warning, can a user be reported to AIV and blocked for disruptive editing for vandalizing above this warning(s)?
Levels 4 and 4im. Y
3. What level warning(s) mention that an editor could be blocked?
Levels 3, 4 and 4im. Y
Please name which edit warning you would issue to a user in the following scenarios:
4. A new user blanking sections.
{{Uw-delete1}}Y
5. Nonsense/Repeating characters.
{{vandalism1}}Y I would give a level 2, bu this is a judgement call and level 1 would be acceptable, too.
6. Replacing an article with obscenities.
{{vandalism1}}N Putting profanities on a page is blatant vandalism, and is therefore bad-faith, so a level 2 or 3 warning should be issued. (Level 1 is assuming good-faith).
7. How should vandalism be reverted (without Rollback)?
Watching the edit history and reverting the page to its last unvandalized version. Y
8. Should section blanking-edits be reverted?
Yes. They should unless "the reason for the removal of the content is readily apparent by examination of the content itself." Y
9. Should test edits be reverted?
Yes, but only (obviously) "If a user has made a test edit and then reverted it", then what should be made is putting the template {{selfrevert}} on their talk page. Y
10. What is the difference between a test edit and vandalism?
Test edits are considered to be made in good faith by experimenting users, are always made in good faith, and may be result of the misuse of the "show preview" button, and then, while prohibited, are not considered vandalism. A vandalism is not always made in good faith. Y
Score: 80% Good job, especially with the direct quotes. Next, I will have you read WP: BLOCK and WP:GAIV. Please tell me when you are done. Please revert some vandalism, as this was why your Rollback request was denied. After you have read these pages and answered questions on them, plus have reverted vandalism well, I will graduate you and help you with your RFR. Regards! Electriccatfish2 (talk) 21:39, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
![[1]](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-rQmZrSy9Cu4/TuPksijCaXI/AAAAAAAAAIg/c1u3ev0vNmA/s1600/IMG_0034.jpg){kind=link}