User talk:Gtstricky/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

→

Archive 8

AfD for Sandeep Unnikrishnan

Hi there. In light of the fact that this article had an AfD that was closed yesterday I have speedy closed this renomination. I will say that the closer of the first AfD, User:Star Mississippi, closed the discussion early, and you may want to ask her ab out reopenning that discussion. After discussing it with her you also could take it to WP:DRV. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 16:31, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Makes sense... thanks. Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 16:40, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

help

wanted to delete my old account can u tell me how to. Thanks Enthusiast10 (talk) 21:03, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

RE:Help

I think I inadvertantly created a war or something on my talk page (see Wrong warning and huggle). I don't know if it's ethical to remove it. Help? Lazylaces (Talk to me) 15:15, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks I wish i knew what that was about. Something about Korea? Lazylaces (Talk to me) 15:35, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Response to {{helpme}}

I noticed that you responded to a {{helpme}} request with something along the lines of "I don't know". In such a situation, please leave the request for other helpers, as nullifying the template means that people cannot see which people need help. As it happens, I do know SuggestBot, so I will answer it, but please bear this in mind for the future. Have a nice day, — neuro^(talk) 12:46, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

"The second sentence on the suggestbot page explains how to use it." I don't understand why you didn't just say that, then. :| — neuro^(talk) 16:05, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

We shouldn't try and teach lessons when we should be giving direct answers to newbies like the aforementioned, who clearly just needs guidance. As for the admin thing, we get a lot of WP:NOTNOW closures, doesn't mean we shouldn't tell them how to do it. That's not a decision we make for them. — neuro^(talk) 16:21, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

I respectfully disagree. Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 16:41, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

No-kill shelter help

Thanks for your help. I filed a 3rd party arbitration request and see that the page has been restored to original location, pending a productive discussion, I hope. Bob98133 (talk) 15:45, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

		Merry Christmas!
		Gtstricky, here's hoping you're having a wonderful Christmas, and here's also hoping that all your family and friends are well. Lets all hope that the year coming will be a good one! If we've had disputes in the past, I hold no grudges, especially at such a time as this. If you don't know I am, I apologise, feel free to remove this from your page. Come and say hi, I won't bite, I swear! It could even be good for me, you know - I'm feeling a little down at the moment with all of these snowmen giving me the cold shoulder :( — neur ho ho ho(talk) 00:05, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Matt Lee new DRV

As you were involved in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Lee (musician) and the Deletion reviews that followed you may want to comment on the new DRV. Also, if you haven't already, you may also want to check out Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#Redirect question and "Need history check for Matt Lee" ANI thread. Thanks. Soundvisions1 (talk) 03:50, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

A cat to ease all of your troubles		Happy New Year!
		Hey there, Gtstricky! Happy new Gregorian year. All the best for the new year, both towards you and your family and friends too. I know that I am the only person lonely enough to be running this thing as the new year is ushered in, but meh, what are you going to do. I like to keep my templated messages in a satisfactorily melancholy tone. ;) Congratulations to Coren, Wizardman, Vassyana, Carcharoth, Jayvdb, Casliber, Risker, Roger Davies, Cool Hand Luke and Rlevse, who were all appointed to the Arbitration Committee after the ArbCom elections. I am sure I am but a voice of many when I say I trust the aforementioned users to improve the committee, each in their own way, as listed within their respective election statements. Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off to update the 2009 article, heh. Best wishes, neuro(talk) 00:49, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Galib is wishing you a Happy New Year. This card promotes WikiLove and hopefully it has made your day much better. Best Wishes and Happy Editing!

Best To Reply At My Talk Page. Thanks.

Just Stopping by. Yours Truly, M.H.^{True Romance iS Dead} 15:16, 1 January 2009 (UTC) .

therese Zrihen-Dvir

Cheers. GtstrickyTalk or C 15:41, 11 March 2008 (UTC) http://www.un-echo-israel.net/Le-nazisme-et-le-radicalisme I appear in the Jewish Telegraph – page 6 – Friday September 5, 2008. My articles are in Terredisrael http://www.terredisrael.com/wordpress/?s=Therese+Zrihen-Dvir http://www.terredisrael.com/wordpress/?p=5870 http://www.terredisrael.com/wordpress/?p=5858 http://www.terredisrael.com/wordpress/?p=5773 http://www.terredisrael.com/wordpress/?p=5521

and many many others which you can trace on google Therese Dvir or Therese Zrihen-Dvir.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Therese Zrihen-Dvir (talk • contribs) 20:51, 2 April 2009 (UTC) 

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chronology of Star Wars

Hello You previously voted on a deletion debation for this article some time ago. The result of that AFD was no consensus, and the article had now been re-nominated for deletion. Just drawing your attention to this fact, should you consider to join in the debate again. Thanks, Dalejenkins | 16:57, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Spotlight relaunch

Some users have decided to try and relaunch the spotlight project, and I am informing all users that were on the previous list of participants.

We thought that, rather than discuss it, it would be more effective to simply start, and try to make it work again. Therefore, we are currently working on an article.

Anyone is welcome to get involved, so please come to the #wikipedia-spotlight channel on the freenode IRC network (see the IRC tutorial for help with IRC). You can get instant access using freenode webchat.

 Chzz  ►  17:21, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Spotlight newsletter

Hi, Just wanted to let you know that the latest edition of the Spotlight newsletter is avilable at Wikipedia:Spotlight/Newsletter/Current. Cheers, — Deon^talk_{I'm BACK!} 03:47, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Chronology of Star Wars

An AFD discussion that you have previously participated in has been reignited. See here for more the new discussion. Dale 10:57, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:SwimWorldCover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SwimWorldCover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:09, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Talula's Table

An article that you have been involved in editing, Talula's Table, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talula's Table. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —MC10 (T•C•GB•L) 02:00, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Trout!

Plip!

for jokingly !voting oppose in Soap's RfA, and freaking me out. :P {{Sonia|ping|enlist}} 06:48, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 03:26, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

In regards to the Spellfury wiki and IMDB

Fine Gtstricky, forget IMDB, are you saying wired.com, Ain't It Cool News and tubefilter aren't reliable webseries sources? They're 3rd party reviews, have you not read the whole spellfury wiki? Important Youtube has given Spellfury it's own special showpage at[[1]], these can't be created by the public, "the guild" has also been given this honor, but notable webseries like "legend of neil" and "riese the series" don't have them. It allows The guild and Spellfury to come up in the listings of traditional television shows, Youtube has deemed Spellfury notable because of the strong viewership of the series and fanbase. Remember we're discussing whether or not Spellfury is a notable "webseries", not a tv show. Showzampa (talk) 14:31, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Spellfury Comment

Comment Thank You Gstricky, Thank Goodness someone around here has heard of Wired.com, they're an extremely reputable site. My only trouble is with your statement "tubefilter and Ain't It Cool News will review anything if you email them and ask them" you don't back that up with any facts or even an explanation.

I don't see that information on the wiki pages for those sites, I dare you to try and put that fact on their pages :) From my experience I would TOTALLY disagree with you, I've been reading those 2 "notable" and reputable websites for years. the only way anyone will get published on those sites is if the editor deems you "notable". Many a webseries or individual would give they're eyeteeth for a review on either of those sites. The web traffic from being mentioned on one of those sites is HIGHLY sought after and valuable. Showzampa (talk) 16:16, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

--Vossanova ^o< 15:41, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Gtstricky! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Julia Gorin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 03:57, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

hello

?? I was just writing my first article. Why are you trying to delete it ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Strike77 (talk • contribs) 06:02, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Trying to understand the reasoning behind wanting to delete Caffeine Energy Drink?

You placed a tag on Caffeine Energy Drinks page. I have not included all the citations or links yet, and intend to tomorrow. However, why does Caffeine Energy not deserve a site like all the other ENergy Drinks on the Market? You say its promotional but I wrote a fair unbiased article and I feel like it should be researched a bit longer and a quick google search of the company and drink should assist in determining the validity of the product. Thanks

Stephanie Begss —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mturner82 (talk • contribs) 06:45, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Diet in Sikhism

Hi Fellow editor. There seems to be a persistent Vandal and the Diet in Sikhism article. Unfortunately my reporting functions are not working. Probably something to do with browser I am using. I was wondering whether you could report this Vandal only IP? Thanks--Sikh-History 12:54, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Help!

I just got a message saying i made an unconstructive edit to this thing (wasnt really looking) but im quite shocked that anyone would accuse me of this, i dont go into the administrative editing stuff in wikipedia, i go on for information. Whats going on? why am i getting blamed for this?--78.148.88.111 (talk) 12:21, 25 October 2010 (UTC) just got more info, it was Tomb of the Julli back in March 2008?! honestly back then i didnt own a computer! (im only 13). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.148.88.111 (talk) 12:22, 25 October 2010 (UTC) Oh now look whats happening, it says i made an edit to EARTHBENDING! on the 30th November 2007! What on earth is earthbending?! and 30th november 2007, thats a month before i even heard of wikipedia, and i was 10 then! TEN! do you think a ten-year old has better things to do than edit things on wikipedia?--78.148.88.111 (talk) 12:31, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Correction to User:Gtstricky/Sandbox

bsd. hi. i edited User:Gtstricky/Sandbox, to "neutralize" a template which auto-includes the page it is on into a category. --Ben Stone 20:20, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit

Hello, and thanks for tagging this for notability back in 2008. The tag's still there; you may want to take it to the Notability Noticeboard or AfD to get it resolved. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 17:12, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Center for Business as an Agent of World Benefit

Thanks for tagging this article for notability back in 2008. It's still tagged; you may want to take it to the Notability noticeboard or AfD to get it resolved. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 13:24, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Dark Matter Moving at the Speed of Light for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dark Matter Moving at the Speed of Light is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Matter Moving at the Speed of Light until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 22:05, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of David Sirieix

The article David Sirieix has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphan article without sufficient sourcing to establish notability under WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brianhe (talk) 16:08, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Reply to offer to help with the Technical Analysis textbook

I would be happy to look at, help edit, add to your effort to create a textbook. John McGinley JMcGoo@juno.com or 203-762-0229 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmcgoo (talk • contribs) 17:03, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Personal C,V,

Retired editor of Arthur Merrill's Technical Trends, a weekly newsletter specializing in market indicators, but only those which test well for accuracy over several time periods. I became a member of the Market Technicians Assn (MTA), near its founding in the early 1970s, was an officer, board member, and was editor of the MTA Journal, helped create the Chartered Technical Analyst(CMT) program, invented the McGinley Dynamics for improved data smoothing and the Double Power Scale for charting, am an expert on market indicators and frequently write and talk about technical analysis. See Facebook.com/JMcGoo. jmcgoo@juno.com 17:10, 24 October 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmcgoo (talk • contribs) 16:57, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

How change two words to italics

I clicked on the italic symbol next to the B above here. I wanted to change two words to italics. I couldn't make it work. I highlited the words but that didn't help. All I got was the words Italic text inserted into the text. Help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmcgoo (talk • contribs) 19:40, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gtstricky. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Restore of a Wikipedia Page

Dear Sir WaffleMaster44 i am New User In Wikipedia my Name is Ritarko from Kolkata India my friend name is sanjib sarkar he is a Indian music director, in the year 2015 his Wikipedia is deleted can you please restore that? I am attaching the link of the person here, please have a look https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FSanjib_Sarkar if anything is require please let me know i will upload Thanks & regards Ritarko — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ritarko2015 (talk • contribs) 19:41, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Sorry I can not. Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 19:30, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

No problem, RFC and away

No problem, I'll start another RFC where a bunch of non technical editors with no interest in the article and no knowledge of the topic can offer up sources that say nothing about it. Clearly writing an encyclopedia is not what Wikiledia is about. --2600:387:6:807:0:0:0:C2 (talk) 15:01, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

The irony is that no one knows if you are a "technical editor" either. Hence the need for wp:con. Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 15:11, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Well, yes, that is ironic that I tie all my additions to literature that actually supports what I add, and even add the references to articles, while other editors don't, and my additions require consensus, while unsourced additions don't. Really, that's ironic. Wikipedia should have a policy that reliable sources are required. --2600:387:6:807:0:0:0:C2 (talk) 15:28, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, Gtstricky, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Vanamonde (talk) 07:39, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

Deletion of Philip J. Miller

Hi there, you just deleted the article for Philip J. Miller that I was working on. In no way was that article even close to done, I had spent about 15 minute working on it so far. I was under the impression I was the only one able to see it? It was still in the editting phase, I was going to complete it (full bio, references etc.) and then publish it for approval. Can I get it back and/or moved to my editing area? I may have made a mistake by creating it in the wrong place.

Thanks, Aidan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aidandiprima (talk • contribs) 16:36, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer granted

Hello Gtstricky. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

• URGENT: Please consider helping get the huge backlog (around 18,000 pages) down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
• Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
• Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
• Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 18:38, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Julien Lugrin

Hello Gtstricky. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Julien Lugrin, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Subject might be important/significant (see also Google News/Books hits for this subject) / use WP:PROD or WP:AFD instead to allow other editors to participate in this decision. Thank you. SoWhy 07:24, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

JLH edit reverted

Hi GTstricky,

I am new to the edit world of Wikipedia and I made an edit on the page "Jennifer Love Hewitt" to accurately state her residency. However, I noticed that you and another user had reverted the changes and would like to find out the reason or if there is a way that I can fix this.

Thanks for your help and welcome message.. It is very nice to meet you.

Thanks, jlhfan43 :)

Jlhfan43 It looks like that information has been removed a few times as being unsourced. While it might be true, a reader must be able to verify it via referenced source. At this point I recommend starting a discussion on the articles talk page. Consensus is a vital part to editing. Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 02:50, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks.. I will make sure I source all my edits from now on  :)