User talk:Greykit

Greykit, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Greykit! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Samwalton9 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 22:50, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Late Late Show (season 47), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Kerr. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry!

Hey! The program I use to look at changes (Huggle) messed up and I saw an old version of the page. Sorry and thanks for your edits! Kharkiv07 ^Talk 02:08, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kathleen Snavely for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kathleen Snavely is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathleen Snavely until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 19:58, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kathleen Snavely for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kathleen Snavely is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathleen Snavely (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. EEng (talk) 10:09, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jonathan Byrne

A tag has been placed on Jonathan Byrne requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Recreation of a hoax article as a bad redirect

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ^{[Username Needed]} 15:05, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Jonathan Byrne" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jonathan Byrne. Since you had some involvement with the Jonathan Byrne redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Daß Wölf 20:33, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tmolep/end

Template:Tmolep/end has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:07, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rityep/end

Template:Rityep/end has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:07, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tllsep/end

Template:Tllsep/end has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:07, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Big September for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Big September is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big September until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bakertheacre ^Chat/_{What I Baked} 17:38, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]