User talk:Great sudhi

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, your first edits were considered vandalism and have been reverted. If your vandalism continues, you may be blocked from editing.

However, if you are serious about contributing to Wikipedia, you are still welcome to visit the Help desk, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have. Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia. As such, the Wikipedia community hopes that you will not engage in further disruptive behavior, but will instead decide to become a contributing Wikipedian. Thank you. - SUN EYE 1 06:08, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sun eye sorry I made some mistakes in pages of arratu, marrakar etc but what I did in the wiki page of beeshma parvem was actually correct I did not do anything wrong in that.In box office collection status you should write box office gross not the overall collection including businesses collection it made .115cr the total business collection it made how can it be written in the box office status. 87 cr the box office collection it made. The source for that is your wiki page and online trackers. In your wiki page of highest groosing malyalam films beeshma parvem got 87 cr box office collection,2 collection from 1 film and that is my source for the changes I have published. The collection now you reverted was wrong and it's actual vandalism .plz try to understand and sorry for some of my publishing mistakes Great sudhi (talk) 15:37, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello! I'm Arjayay. Your recent edit(s) to the page Bheeshma Parvam appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:23, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hello arjayay.you had sent so many messages.I am replying that my edit in beeshma parvem was correct.In the page of box office you should write the box office status of the film.115cr is the total business collection of the film how could you write it in the box office collection. Box office is about the money collecting from theatre not overall business of the film.the collection that is now publishedin that page is real vandalism if you have any doubts go to the Wikipedia page of highest grossing malyalam film there beeshma collection is 87 cr and that is my source. If you have any doubt go to that page there the collection is 87cr that is the source in Wikipedia 2 collection status for 1 film that is vandalism I tried to correct it .And sorry for edits made on arratu,marrakar that was a mistake and I apologise but what I made on beeshma was actually correct the collection now published is actually vandalism Great sudhi (talk) 15:27, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Aaraattu (2022 film). Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:24, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Arjayay I am sorry Great sudhi (talk) 15:47, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Marakkar: Lion of the Arabian Sea, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 18:27, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry arjayay.this was a mistake from my side and sincerely apologize but for beeshma parvem what I was published was 100 percent correct Great sudhi (talk) 15:47, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Bheeshma Parvam. - Arjayay (talk) 15:50, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hello sir I had replied you many times what I have published on pages of beeshma parvem was correct and it was not vandalism .87 cr is the actual box office collection of that film 115cr is the business collection how can you write it in the box office status in Wikipedia of highest grossing malyalam it written then how dare you revert it I want a answer from you in box office collection status you should write the box office collection not the overall business collection of the film. And I had apologized for some of my mistakes but in case of beeshmaparvem I am correct. If you have any secret agenda in case of this go ahead with and you should reply for this and give me an answer I have source that I already told the wiki page of highest grossing malyalam films.plzz reply sir I want to now your clarification in this and how you reverted the collection now gave a anwer I wrote the box office collection of it Great sudhi (talk) 16:06, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Marakkar: Lion of the Arabian Sea, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 15:51, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 16:22, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Justice League (film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do not removed box office bomb statement because it lost the studios money and many sources calls it. Continuing must be dealt with. LancedSoul (talk) 05:32, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mamangam (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.
Please stop trying to use Sacnilk as a source, it is not a reliable source - as per WP:ICTFSOURCES - Arjayay (talk) 14:47, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello, I'm Aadirulez8. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of Malayalam films of 2024 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You have repeatedly removed referenced content which is odd. Aadirulez8 (talk) 15:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 20:07, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]