User talk:GraemeRead
This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of "antal international", and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.pressbox.co.uk/detailed/Business/Zero-One_Launch_Antal_International_s_New_Website_543944.html.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 12:36, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of "antal international"
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on "antal international", requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:39, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Antal International, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.pressbox.co.uk/detailed/Business/Zero-One_Launch_Antal_International_s_New_Website_543944.html.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 12:41, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Antal International
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Antal International, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:43, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi WikiDan61 - I rewrote the page - entirely - all factual and included all the relevant links and Lectonar deleted it because I had submitted it again. Can you help?
- I was in the midst of editing the page when it was deleted again. I found the tone of the article overly promotional, touting the benefits of the company and the expertise of its staff, but I felt that there might be some salvageable content. My suggestion to you would be to recreate the article in your user space (for example, at User:GraemeRead/Antal International), and once you have a copy you are comfortable with, have another editor (me, if you'd like, or anyone else) look at it before you go live with it. I have to say that your single-minded effort to get this information posted (you have created the article 3 times only to have it deleted 3 times, with no other significant contributions to Wikipedia) makes me wonder if you aren't trying to promote the company, if only just a little. I can't really find any reliable sources to verify that this company merits an article at Wikipedia. To be sure, they get quoted a lot in articles about employment statistics, but I don't find any significant coverage of the company themselves. If there is none, the article is not likely to be allowed to remain even if it can be written in neutral language. Good luck! WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:12, 23 February 2011 (UTC)