User talk:Godzillafan4ever

December 2017

Hello, I'm Longhair. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Joseph Lamb have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Longhair\^talk 08:39, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Hello, I'm ElfLady64. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Charleston (song), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. While you gave a link to a YouTube video, this is not a WP:Reliable source which can be used to verify the statement that "Sam Fonteyn wrote his own rendition of Charleston, calling it "Charleston Charlie"". Thanks! ElfLady64 (talk) 23:14, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of lengthy interview excerpts to several articles

Hi Godzillafan4ever. You've recently added several lengthy excerpts of interviews to a few articles. Generally, this is discouraged; using extensive amounts of material from copyrighted sources runs afoul of our policies (see Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria and Wikipedia:Do not include the full text of lengthy primary sources). Per No original research, we also try to avoid relying on an editor's interpretation of primary source material for factual claims. I've removed these interviews for now; feel free to reply if you have any questions. —0xf₈e₈ (t♥lk) 23:49, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Titanic (1997 film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 06:17, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Bender Should Not Be Allowed on TV. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 05:15, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited My Grandfather's Clock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Haydn Quartet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Swing Low, Sweet Chariot, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 10:05, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tenacious D in The Pick of Destiny, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A Clockwork Orange (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 15:53, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at The Cat in the Hat (film), you may be blocked from editing. SummerPhD^v2.0 03:13, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries/synopses that conflict with the plot summary edit guides, as you did at X-Men Origins. You may wish to review the specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 14:10, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

Hi. You added a line about a song in the soundtrack of The Wall in this edit, with the edit summary "listen closely in the beginning of the film if you don't believe me". Please have a read of WP:NOR: it's up to you to WP:Verify what you write on Wikipedia, not other editors. I've added a couple of WP:Reliable sources to verify the claim, but next time, it's your job. Thanks, 82.132.212.214 (talk) 05:04, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This editor has been doing it for years and never pays any attention to any request to stop. [1] is extraordinary; the editor psychoanalyses a fictional character (of course, that's not what "cold reading" means) and adds the resulting analysis to the article. Pinkbeast (talk) 11:02, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]