User talk:Qwertypolice

Glendonldy, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Glendonldy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017

Hello, I'm Charlesdrakew. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of bus routes in Singapore, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Charles (talk) 21:26, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of bus routes in Singapore. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Charles (talk) 08:34, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

Please see wp:no original research Adding references is how we ensure that content is valid. Without references, a reader can not easily validate information and there is no presumption of accuracy. See Help:Referencing for beginners and Help:footnotes. This is covered by the Wikipedia policy of wp:verifiability (WP:V). Please wp:cite your edits with wp:reliable sources (RS). Per WP:V unsourced content can be removed. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 08:30, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved. In the future you can use the "New section" link in the top right. For more details see the talk page guidelines. Please stop the ridiculous duplication of messages on Charles's talk page It's ONLY making you look stupid. I think you're probably close to being reported for personal attacks and harassment. Also, like this template says, you add new stuff at the bottom ... and finally, learn to sign your edits with four tilde characters. DBaK (talk) 10:12, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Oh yes, here we are. Hope this helps. DBaK (talk) 10:13, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please take note of WP:3RR

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at List of bus routes in Singapore. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

FYI, please do take note that you do not violate the 3-reverts policy as it could get you blocked from editing. Bennv3771 (talk) 13:36, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of 118 alex (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:27, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Qwertypolice (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18707 was submitted on Jul 11, 2017 15:08:53. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:08, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]