User talk:JNW21 885

Welcome!

Hi, GlbalMedia. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:24, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

JNW21 885 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

JW1985 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Thank you for your patience as I am very new to wiki. I am attempting to follow all of the guidelines, so thank you for your help. I put in a request for a username change to reflect my personal use of this website, and I will not share my login credentials with anyone. I am talking with many editors that have been helpful within the wiki system to help understand how I can best contribute to the website in a manner that is appropriate. Respectfully, I am requesting to be unblocked so that I can take steps towards utilizing and contributing to wikipedia. Thank you for your kind consideration. GlbalMedia (talk) 18:39, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Procedural close. You are not blocked. However, please read through WP:COI and WP:PAID for our rules on paid editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:46, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "GlbalMedia", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username, by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:25, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are not blocked

Hi GlbalMedia, you are not, and have never been, blocked from editing. Have you filled out the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest already? If so, there is nothing left to do; please remove the unblock request when you sent a rename request already. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:50, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julia Nesheiwat (October 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads like the press releases and corporate profiles, or some nomination application for an award. Needs to be neutralized in tone. Replace 20 years of experience with year ranges.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Julia Nesheiwat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Julia Nesheiwat, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:15, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JNW21 885! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:15, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julia Nesheiwat has been accepted

Julia Nesheiwat, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MurielMary (talk) 09:00, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Janette Nesheiwat (June 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MapleSoy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Per previous comments, the article would need to include additional references that show substantial coverage of the subject, rather than just quote her (and not including announcements of job changes per WP:ROUTINE).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Janette Nesheiwat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Janette Nesheiwat, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MapleSoy (talk) 22:28, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Janette Nesheiwat (July 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tom (LT) was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not meet the criteria for entertainers in WP:ENT. Does not demonstrate significant impact in the field in which she works. Citations provides are not independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Janette Nesheiwat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Janette Nesheiwat, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tom (LT) (talk) 06:59, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Janette Nesheiwat (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Janette Nesheiwat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Janette Nesheiwat, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 02:35, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PAID

I know you are already aware of this because you and I have had this conversation numerous times. You are not permitted to move your own articles (for which you are paid) to mainspace. They must go through an independent review at WP:AFC. Praxidicae (talk) 19:46, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually no, you and I haven't talked about that. We talked about disclosing being paid, for which I have done. Can you please provide specific information as to how to submit the article then?JNW21 885 (talk) 19:53, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, yes, I did, as did other helpers in the help chat. And so does the paid policy. Do not move it yourself. Praxidicae (talk) 19:53, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. thank you. I was simply trying to update the title so it had capitals in the last name and instructions told me to "move" the article. That's what I did. JNW21 885 (talk) 19:55, 7 December 2020 (UTC) ::So what are my next steps now then? JNW21 885 (talk) 19:57, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JanetteNesheiwat.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JanetteNesheiwat.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Janette Nesheiwat (January 24)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Chicdat was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This has been declined enough times. I have given up all hope of resubmission and acceptance.

🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 11:53, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate a little more professionalism next time, please. "Given up all hope"? Instead, perhaps you could offer some tangible suggestions as to how this would be more suitable for Wikipedia. JNW21 885 (talk) 00:52, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft was declined 5 times; most drafts are not given this many chances before they are rejected. A number of reviewers have agreed that she isn't notable – until that changes, the article won't be published. Blablubbs|talk 14:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]