User talk:Gisselolzba/The Female Man

Hello! Great job with your draft! I've completed my peer review, and you can find it here: User:Gisselolzba/The Female Man/HannSel19 Peer Review. HannSel19 (talk) 11:16, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great job with the article! I finished my review. Kgroft (talk) 11:55, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Greenlight

Hello Gissel,

Your article draft looks great! I see you got really solid feedback from your peer reviews from Hannah and Kay, and you've made revisions based on that feedback, which is nice to see. By the way, I noticed you were assigned 3 peer reviews to do instead of 2 like most students... I've already read 2 of them and I assume the 3rd will be just as thoughtful as they were, so thanks for handling those so well!

I really don't have much to add besides the peer reviews you already received, because you've done a fantastic job. I'm glad you focused more on the "Literary significance and reception" and "Structure and format" sections than the "Plot summary" section. I think those two sections benefitted from your expansions more than the latter would have, if you had tried to stretch it out more. I agree with Hannah about the deletion of the direct quote from the "Lead" section being a good choice. I also definitely liked that you expanded the "Minor characters" subsection... what was the point of having that list for only 3 characters? Haha.

Anyway, after double checking for formatting, grammar, and style, you can begin publishing live on Wikipedia. (See the "Moving work out of the sandbox" module for more detailed instructions on that, if needed.) --Sjnickerson (talk) 21:42, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]