User talk:Ghosts Ghouls

Welcome!

Hello, Ghosts Ghouls, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Seriously

You are restoring 14K bytes of text which was removed following WP:Contributor copyright investigations/GreenUniverse, a cleanup of copyright infringement by a banned sockpuppet. You bear the burden of responsibility to do a very thorough check. IRWolfie- (talk) 19:28, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jan Ehrenwald

The article Jan Ehrenwald has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has no visible verifiable references from reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 19:49, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Biographies of Living Persons prods from an article unless it contains at least one reliable source or was created before 18 March 2010, as you did with Jan Ehrenwald. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider sourcing the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. ⁓ Hello 71 20:52, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Parapsychology. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 13:26, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of BookWorm44 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:27, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]