User talk:Ghost of Jack

This is Ghost of Jack's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mk Timothy has been accepted

Mk Timothy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 17:14, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MK Timothy moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to MK Timothy. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ... discospinster _talk 21:49, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dear Admin,

I resubmitted this article, it is about a notable person. please, review it's all sources, those are reliable and establish his notability. I hope, I can contribute here as good. Ghost of Jack (talk) 04:55, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello, I'm Synorem. I noticed that in this edit to Kwagalana Group, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Synorem (talk) 04:16, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! Actually I want to improve it. Ghost of Jack (talk) 04:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mk Timothy Karubang. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Smallangryplanet (talk) 10:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for my mistake.

Please check also Talk:Mk Timothy Ghost of Jack (talk) 10:24, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mk Timothy (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jamiebuba were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mk Timothy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 09:10, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ghost of Jack! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 09:10, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello, I'm PEPSI697. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Mk Timothy Karubang. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. PEPSI697 (💬 • 📝) 10:18, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please move it to Mk Timothy. Actually, he is mostly known by this name. Ghost of Jack (talk) 10:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Even though you've created this article/redirect page. Still, it's always a good idea to give a valid reason or an edit summary to explain why. You could've simply explained in your edit summary that you were turning the article into a redirect page. Thanks. PEPSI697 (💬 • 📝) 10:23, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay! Can you pardon me for my this mistake? Ghost of Jack (talk) 10:25, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok. We all make mistakes sometimes. At the start, I assumed bad faith while patrolling RC. Thanks. PEPSI697 (💬 • 📝) 10:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copy and paste move

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Musasizi Timothy Karubanga a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Mk Timothy. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 10:29, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, As the advice of you, I have added this template to this two page. Ghost of Jack (talk) 10:37, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Agaba Perez per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Agaba Perez. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 16:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request...

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ghost of Jack (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not related with this person, i just wanted to write about my interest. I was also unknown about the sock of this person. I will be strongly careful, before writing about those who was sock. Please, give me release. I am not this person.

Decline reason:

Given Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Agaba Perez/Archive, I don't find this convincing. Yamla (talk) 19:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.