Jump to content

User talk:Gene93k/Archives 2016-Q1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archives 2015-Q4Archives 2016-Q1Archives 2016-Q2

AfD

Request to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Universe Romania (2nd nomination) per new sources presented there. North America1000 01:57, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Resp

Could you delete this article in French wiki? Grateful for the attention. 2804:14C:5BB6:44C:E269:95FF:FE51:FF80 (talk) 19:55, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

The Californias

A hoax article, The Californias has been voted for speedy deletion a few times over the last nine years. The last time was in July, here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Las Californias Province. Note that the content was pasted into a new article, then the old was redirected to the new one to avoid deletion. A time before that, content was copied into a new article and the articles were merged to avoid deletion (see the present article's Talk pages). I am requesting that the original decision to delete be permamently carried out and that the User:WCCasey be prevented from carrying on the hoax any longer. The article is one of the longest running hoaxes on Wikipedia. Thank you. Wyeson 07:17, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

I have added the article to the deletion log, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Californias. Also, please note that the creator of the hoax, User:WCCasey has been following me around for years and reverting whatever I do. From the reverts, some of his other user names and ISPs are apparent in the History; can the stalking be stopped? Thank you. Wyeson 08:44, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

JOEL BARNES

The page Joel Barnes was deleted by you and it seems like a biased deletion in favor of the Weather Channel and some of their staff willing to show more skin then some of WeatherNation's staff.

Alex Wilson has no more reason to have a Wiki Page if no one at Weather Nation is qualifies to have one.

Please re-instate the Joel Barnes page. The review was started by a Nebraska local pushing his own agenda to who is a notable person from Omaha and who isn't. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FB90:128:B6C1:0:3:EBF8:B901 (talk) 02:17, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

  • I am not an administrator and I did not delete the article. However, you have also contacted the administrator who did delete the article. A consensus of editors agreed that Joel Barnes is not notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Finally, please note that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is an argument that doesn't fly around here. • Gene93k (talk) 02:59, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

House of Knowledge International School

I got into a catch 22, while creating the wikipage for House of Knowledge International School I got a notice that the article was a stub and lead missing tags, so the content from that website was added. References and more relevant information was going to be added in the coming days but the article has been deleted without the time to update the information.

The information that will be put there will be relevant as other content found in the following categories https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Education_in_Beijing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Private_schools_in_Beijing

The content provided there will help the international community looking on education alternative for international schools following the standard use int the following existing articles.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_School_of_Beijing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_International_School_of_Beijing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulwich_College_Beijing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daystar_Academy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etonkids_Bilingual_Kindergarten https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beijing_Huijia_Private_School‎ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peili_Vocational_Institute

I would like if you can help us recover the last deleted page so we can continue to create the information that will be useful for the community that is living behind a Chinese firewall and uses Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avaldesm (talk • contribs) 02:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Primary schools (K–8) are generally not considered notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The primary schools you listed have notability problems of their own. In general, an article need citations from multiple reliable sources independent of the subject. The lack of these sources got the article taken to WP:Articles for deletion. It had to be speedily deleted because it was copyright infringement. Unless this school has substantial coverage from reputable media sources, it will likely be deleted again if it is recreated. • Gene93k (talk) 03:56, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
  • I understand that, but it comes that I was not given enough time to write the full article the the proper citations. I agree that the way the article was did not comply with the copyrights requirements. I wish to continue writing this article so it can help the international community here in Beijing. The information that will be on the article is in the same tone and coverage of other existing wikipedia articles that you can see in my edit. Can I be allowed to finish the article before it being deleted?--Avaldesm (talk) 04:11, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Kumoh

I've just reverted yet another edit by one of the two IPs on that Korean article that you've evidently been keeping an eye on. I certainly sympathize with your sentiment, and I've noticed that this has been going on for quite some time, with persistent edit warring and lack of discussion, so perhaps something like ANI would be warranted? Dschslava (talk) 05:18, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Given the circumstances, I do believe that ANI is more appropriate. I think that I'll let you do the honours, with the goal of getting more eyes on the article. Dschslava (talk) 08:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Clutch albums

Why have you put what ever it is up that you have? I didn't see you comment about the matters being discussed? I'm in the process of dealing with 'persons' who are concerned about this article in question, remaining for starters, so what was your contribution to the debate? Nuro Dragonfly (talk) 02:42, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

  • My function in the Clutch album deletion discussions was deletion sorting. Deletion sorting serves to alert interested editors that a relevant deletion debate is open under the listed category. It neither supports nor opposes the deletion in question. • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Thank you for a very polite and concise response. I'll not deny my apparent newbie status to the status quo here on the wiki. I very strongly find the attitude of certain 'editors' a .....challenge. I appreciate the effort in your response. Nuro Dragonfly (talk) 08:39, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

User talk:104.243.160.113

I see you left a warning for User talk:104.243.160.113.

I left a message about this editor at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#New sock of User:Dragonrap2. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 03:56, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Krishna Kumar Gupta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bilaspur. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 30 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gene93k/Archives_2016-Q1&oldid=1252036823"