User talk:Ged UK/Archives/2012/November
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Ged UK. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A barnstar for you!
|
The Admin's Barnstar |
| Hi, I have always been seeing your contributions, but couldn't get enough time to award you. Hence, a small appreciation from my side for all your contributions so far :) Way to go!!! -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 15:05, 1 November 2012 (UTC) |
- Thanks! GedUK 09:34, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 November 2012
- Op-ed: 2012 WikiCup comes to an end
- News and notes: Wikimedian photographic talent on display in national submissions to Wiki Loves Monuments
- In the media: Was climate change a factor in Hurricane Sandy?
- Discussion report: Protected Page Editor right; Gibraltar hooks
- Featured content: Jack-O'-Lanterns and Toads
- Technology report: Hue, Sqoop, Oozie, Zookeeper, Hive, Pig and Kafka
- WikiProject report: Listening to WikiProject Songs
The Signpost: 12 November 2012
- News and notes: Court ruling complicates the paid-editing debate
- Featured content: The table has turned
- Technology report: MediaWiki 1.20 and the prospects for getting 1.21 code reviewed promptly
- WikiProject report: Land of parrots, palm trees, and the Holy Cross: WikiProject Brazil
Can you put a temporary protection to the articles Kirovabad pogrom, Armenians in Nakhchivan and Armenians in Baku, like you did for the article Armenians in Azerbaijan?
Can you put a temporary protection to the articles Kirovabad pogrom, Armenians in Nakhchivan and Armenians in Baku, like you did for the article Armenians in Azerbaijan?
There is persistent vandalism and edit warring going on between IP users. Temporary protection will cool things down for the time being.
Thanks.
Saguamundi talk 12:49, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Morocco
Dear user Ged Uk
Thanks for the protection of the article Morocco. As you can see in the page's history, the two users Omar-Toons and tachfin kept revering a contribution of mine regarding sexual tourism in Morocco because (according to them) it gives a negative image about Morocco. As a discussion about that section is on, could you please revert the article content prior to the last Vandalism by Tachfin cause he also removed a section that is not problematic (The section regarding narcotics). Could you please also review the discussion in the article's talk page in order to have a better understanding of the situation? Thanks a lot Fort-Henry (talk) 13:03, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Done I've restored the narcotics section. I've left the other out as I don't want to favour one side over the other, and everyone involves knows the paras well enough, and it's in the history. Sorry it took so long, but that page is so big my browser really struggles to open it. GedUK 13:48, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Hey, I do not really care which version is on whilst page is protected (Wikipedia not being a time race right?) but I do disagree with narcotics section that I did revert (as did other users who performed same revert) and I'm a bit disappointed that you feel compelled to perform reverts on Fort-Henry's behalf, as an admin you know you shouldn't be involving yourself in such manner re content disputes. --Tachfin (talk) 01:04, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
- Well, the discussion was almost entirely on the sex tourism part as far as I could tell, though I may have missed something. No matter, I'm not taking sides, and the discussion is still focused on the sex tourism issue. GedUK 18:00, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
- Hey, I do not really care which version is on whilst page is protected (Wikipedia not being a time race right?) but I do disagree with narcotics section that I did revert (as did other users who performed same revert) and I'm a bit disappointed that you feel compelled to perform reverts on Fort-Henry's behalf, as an admin you know you shouldn't be involving yourself in such manner re content disputes. --Tachfin (talk) 01:04, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 November 2012
- News and notes: FDC's financial muscle kicks in
- WikiProject report: No teenagers, mutants, or ninjas: WikiProject Turtles
- Technology report: Structural reorganisation "not a done deal"
- Featured content: Wikipedia hit by the Streisand effect
- Discussion report: GOOG, MSFT, WMT: the ticker symbol placement question
Telecom Council wikipedia entry
yes, please restore the Telecom Council entry to my userspace to work on — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kerton (talk • contribs) 02:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 November 2012
- News and notes: Toolserver finance remains uncertain
- Recent research: Movie success predictions, readability, credentials and authority, geographical comparisons
- Featured content: Panoramic views, history, and a celestial constellation
- Technology report: Wikidata reaches 100,000 entries
- WikiProject report: Directing Discussion: WikiProject Deletion Sorting
A barnstar for you!
|
|
The Admin's Barnstar |
| For your great contributions on WP:RPP. Torreslfchero (talk) 12:32, 29 November 2012 (UTC) |
- Thanks, very kind! GedUK 12:44, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Keep up the good work on that page and also on other admin areas. There are quite few admins available on page protection these days. Torreslfchero (talk) 13:55, 29 November 2012 (UTC)