User talk:Felicia777

Archives

It's in her book.

I really don't appreciate being accused of printing "defamatory" comments when the characterization in question is directly based on Davidson's published work. If you are going to remove my edit, please do so on legitimate grounds. 184.146.209.113 (talk) 22:11, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IP

I've reported them to AIV. If you get anything like that again just report them straight away. Knitsey (talk) 22:46, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

God bless you. I don't tolerate personal attacks. Felicia (talk) 22:47, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have you asked for tp protection? Knitsey (talk) 22:57, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I left a message on an admin's talk page. Felicia (talk) 23:00, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will ask at the page protection page for you. It might be quicker. Knitsey (talk) 23:01, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have protected for a day; keep in mind that the threshold for protecting user talk-pages is much higher than for normal protections: see WP:UTPROT. I have also have revision deleted 2 edits by the IP; if they vandalise again, please report to WP:AIV...it's more more effective to block than to protect. Lectonar (talk) 10:57, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

why removed my edits on Bluefish?

Hi Felicia,

why did you revert my edits on Bluefish? I discussed those with user BlauweVis who is the most active editor on this article, and he was OK with it?

kind regards, Fortysix46 (talk) 09:34, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:All Seniors Foundation

WP:A7 is not suitable for drafts. Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:20, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. Felicia (talk) 21:21, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy tagging

You tagged Draft:Keroseno y Finito as WP:G1. The tag is incorrect for this page; have you read what the criterion says? I deleted the article, but on my own per WP:G11. Please be more careful in the future. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I only have a very limited understanding of Spanish, thus the incorrect tag Felicia (talk) 15:52, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are free translators available, but if you can't translate a page, then you shouldn't tag it for G1, which specifically excludes non-English pages.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 August 2024

In the media: Portland pol profile paid for from public purse

Recent research: STORM: AI agents role-play as "Wikipedia editors" and "experts" to create Wikipedia-like articles, a more sophisticated effort than previous auto-generation systems

In focus: Twitter marks the spot

News and notes: Another Wikimania has concluded.

Special report: Nano or just nothing: Will nano go nuclear?

Opinion: HouseBlaster's RfA debriefing

Traffic report: Ball games, movies, elections, but nothing really weird

Humour: I'm proud to be a template

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:47, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted page

Hi, I created a draft of a page to outline a novel, which I run a fan group regarding. There was no advertising on the page, but I had not yet placed the necessary sources on the page. I realise that the page may have needed some editing and changes to conform to Wikipedia's standards, which is fine, but it was not promotional or advertising in any way, it was simply a run-down of a published novel as per many other examples on Wiki. The page was marked for speedy deletion and has now been removed. I wonder if this could be reconsidered, please? LittleBassingtonFans (talk) 15:19, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was deleted by an admin for the exact reason that I tagged it. Felicia (talk) 15:24, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can I appeal this? There was zero promotion on the page and it was ungenerous of you to have tagged it without speaking to me. LittleBassingtonFans (talk) 15:36, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@LittleBassingtonFans, if you want to appeal the decision, you should contact the deleting administrator (in this case, Seraphimblade). @Felicia777, if someone asks you about how to appeal speedy deletion, please do not ignore them. -- asilvering (talk) 13:12, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 September 2024

News and notes: WikiCup enters final round, MCDC wraps up activities, 17-year-old hoax article unmasked

In the media: AI is not playing games anymore. Is Wikipedia ready?

Recent research: Simulated Wikipedia seen as less credible than ChatGPT and Alexa in experiment

News from the WMF: Meet the 12 candidates running in the WMF Board of Trustees election

Wikimania: A month after Wikimania 2024

Serendipity: What it's like to be Wikimedian of the Year

Traffic report: After the gold rush

Humour: Local man halfway through rude reply no longer able to recall why he hates other editor

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:25, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging unsubmitted drafts with WP:G11

Please don't tag drafts that have never been submitted for speedy deletion as promo. We can hardly say that a draft is exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten if its author hasn't even finished writing it in the first place. (The one I just declined now contains far more unflattering content than anything promotional.) And if they have finished, and simply not submitted it, it will be deleted six months after the last edit as WP:G13 anyway. -- asilvering (talk) 13:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]