User talk:Gantavyamalviyagantu
March 2019
[edit]Please do not add or change content, as you did at Reem Shaikh, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:14, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The article Neelesh Malviya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence of notability found.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 10:40, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Neelesh Malviya for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neelesh Malviya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neelesh Malviya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 10:54, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Neelesh Malviya
[edit]Information uploaded on Neelesh Malviya is genuine as per my knowledge. He is my relative. Gantavyamalviyagantu (talk) 17:41, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Gantavya Malviya
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Gantavya Malviya, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 05:47, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
March 2019
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Gantavya Malviya, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 05:52, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Recent edit to Urmila Tiwari
[edit]Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person (Urmila Tiwari), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 22:13, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Materialscientist (talk) 22:13, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
please unblock me.
[edit]Gantavyamalviyagantu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Your reason here Gantavyamalviyagantu (talk) 08:21, 29 March 2019 (UTC) Please unblock me. the information i uploaded on Urmila Tiwari page is 100% genuine and are from reliable sources. I personally met her. Her interview is also uploded on youtube [1]
Decline reason:
You don't yet seem to understand WP:CITE and WP:RS. Now that you know your existing edits were inappropriate, what specifically would you do differently if unblocked? Yamla (talk) 09:47, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.