User talk:Friesmaniac99

September 2017

Hello, I'm Tornado chaser. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to ALEKS have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tornado chaser (talk) 17:13, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 17:26, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Friesmaniac99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is an older account. I was inmature in 2017. I did vandalism as a joke and didn't think it would harm anything. I have matured and I kindly request I be unblocked. I want to create some new pages that are well formatted and not vandalism. Thanks. Friesmaniac99 (talk) 15:33, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were well aware that you were harming the article. It would also help if you could describe what exactly you want to write about now. Huon (talk) 18:01, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Friesmaniac99, regarding your UTRS appeal that I redirected here, I would be willing to support an unblock to give you a second chance if you respond to Huon's request above to explain what edits you would like to make if you were to be unblocked.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:43, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Huon I plan to create a new page for a car wash equipment manufacturer. There is currently not a page for them and I feel that it is needed. The company is called Macneil Wash Systems. And I plan on helping fixing errors and mistakes in various Wikipedia articles. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Friesmaniac99 (talk • contribs)

Please sign your posts using four ~ (like this: ~~~~). Also, I'll @Huon: so that they know you responded.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:17, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Widr, what are your thoughts? It has been more than two years since the block, and while I have doubts that Maceneil Wash Systems is notable enough for an article, the request doesn't seem unreasonable to me. I'd be willing to give a second chance. Huon (talk) 18:33, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, so I've gone ahead and unblocked. Friesmaniac99, please make only constructive edits from now on. Widr (talk) 19:01, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]