User talk:Forthgone

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Forthgone! Thank you for your contributions. I am TBrandley and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! TBran dl ey 01:47, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Forthgone, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!

I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 00:50, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Forrest Gander may have broken the syntax by modifying 7 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:30, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Forrest Gander may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:12, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ashwini Bhat Profile 2012.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Ashwini Bhat Profile 2012.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 14:09, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ashwini Bhat 2012.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Ashwini Bhat 2012.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 14:09, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ashwini Bhat.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Arthur goes shopping (talk) 15:18, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ashwini Bhat.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 01:09, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your email

I received your email regarding "Ashwini Bhat". In order to address it point-by-point I would like to copy the body of it here. I will leave out your email address of course.

If you prefer, you may post a revised version of it here. I am logging out of Wikipedia but I should be back within 12-48 hours. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 03:01, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I received your second email. I prefer to communicate about Wikipedia articles "out in public" so everyone can see. If you will re-post your emails to me here OR give me permission to re-post them here for you, then I can reply. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 04:46, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

David, I'm not really sure how (technically) to interact here. If I write this, do you see it? I'm fine about communicating in public. Just not adept at it. But yes, you have my permission to post the body of my Bhat entry here if it will help me to see how more properly to edit it. Thanks. Forthgone (talk) 17:59, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I see this. I have your talk page on my "watchlist" (see special:watchlist for your personal watchlist, and Help:Watching pages for help regarding the "watchlist" feature), which I check almost every day that I edit. I wanted permission to post your emails to me. There is no need to copy the content of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ashwini Bhat here, since that's already "on wiki" for everyone to see.

So, do I have your permission to copy the bodies of both of the emails I received here? If not, that is okay, you may wish to just rewrite your questions here. In any case, once a question is asked here, I'll try my best to answer it. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 23:03, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great. And I can see from the responses of others that you have extended yourself on many occasions. Thank you. So yes, I'll rewrite my questions here. In the denial of my posting of an article on Ashwini Bhat, you suggested that there were two major errors. I'm not sure I understand them completely, but this is how I understand them. 1. That by making links to museums and galleries where her work has been exhibited, and perhaps by linking The Howard Foundation Award to both the Howard Foundation website and to the page that lists her as a recipient of the award, I am promoting her rather than providing information. My thinking was that in terms of "verifiability," it was necessary to show her relation to those exhibitions and awards. 2. The second major observation has to do with citations by people with whom she is somehow "connected." But I don't see any of those besides the reference to my own article about her work which, since I am a professional writer and since my essay on her work appeared in a major juried trade journal, I thought would be relevant. As Bhat is really a significant ceramic artist, winning significant prizes and exhibiting her work on three continents, the flaws in representing her as a significant artist must be my own. I'm grateful for any suggestions you have. Thanks again. Forthgone (talk) 03:38, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are there non-primary, reliable sources that are "independent" of Ms. Bhat which say pretty much the same things as the sources you are using? See Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources to get an idea of the kinds of sources Wikipedia prefers. Primary sources, which include a listing of who exhibited at a given gallery that was created by that gallery or an announcement of who won a given award by the people who are giving the award are allowed but secondary sources are strongly preferred. A local or better yet non-local newspaper, magazine, or journal that meets the criteria in Wikipedia:Reliable sources which listed her appearances in galleries and her awards would be better than the primary sources. Just be sure to use a source that Wikipedia considers reliable. The lack of secondary, reliable sources independent of the person is a good but not certain indication of a lack of notability.

As for your second question, any gallery which stands to make money or gain prestige by displaying her works is "connected" to her in the sense that concerns Wikipedia. The connected-ness is almost always 2-way. Being "connected" isn't a huge issue for merely factual information but it can be a major issue when it comes to opinions. For example, if you used a gallery web page as a reference for "Bhat displayed her work at XYZ gallery" that would be okay because it's purely factual, although a newspaper or other secondary source would be strongly preferred. If you used that same gallery's web site as a reference to "Bhat's work is the best work in the field in the last 10 years" that would not be okay because the gallery's opinion could be perceived as being biased by the fact that they are showing her works. However, if that same gallery said "Joe Expert (were Joe Expert is a recognized expert and is not affiliated with the gallery in question) said 'Bhat's work is the best work in the field in the last 10 years'" then that would probably be fine because it's some other expert's opinion, not the gallery's, which you are citing. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 04:05, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, if you do wind up using your own work as a reference in this submission, please add the following above your submission: {{afc comment|1=I, Forthgone, wrote [name of work], which I am using as a reference in the submission below. ~~~~}} This will alert the reviewer. The reviewer may ask you to try to replace your own work with a different work if possible. The reviewer may also put the {{connected contributor}} template on the resulting article's talk page so readers can know that you, the contributor, are closely tied to either the subject or to one of the references. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 04:10, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ashwini Bhat concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ashwini Bhat, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:06, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ashwini Bhat concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ashwini Bhat, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ashwini Bhat concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ashwini Bhat, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ashwini Bhat has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ashwini Bhat. Thanks! SD0001 (talk) 07:30, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashwini Bhat (2) (January 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RadioFan was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ashwini Bhat (2) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RadioFan (talk) 03:35, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashwini Bhat (2) (March 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

I'm certain if this is notable for WP:CREATIVE, the Newport Art Museum may help for notability but I'm still not certain, and this still needs any further available in-depth third-party sources overall.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ashwini Bhat (2) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 08:13, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ashwini Bhat (2) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ashwini Bhat (2). Thanks! Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 18:22, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashwini Bhat has been accepted

Ashwini Bhat, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bradv 04:55, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Forthgone. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Forthgone. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Forthgone. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]