Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion is not a war zone
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Many more essays
[edit]Wikipedia:Notability/RFC:Reevaluation#Journalists Ikip (talk) 17:16, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- thanks, what a gold mine of information! interesting to see how the inclusion - deletion dimension is viewed by reliable sources. FeydHuxtable (talk) 18:14, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Thoughts on this essay
[edit][This reply was rather long, so I put it on its own page: User:Robofish/Thoughts on inclusionism and deletionism.] Robofish (talk) 23:42, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Moved to project space
[edit]Looking over the history on this essay and seeing how much the community has expanded and improved on this essay over time, it seems worthwhile to move this essay into project space, since it is certainly good advice that more people should follow... SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:35, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
"Gutting" an article during deletion discussion
[edit]I've created an essay on Gutting an article during deletion discussion.
You may find it interesting reading at: User:Cirt/Gutting.
Cheers,
— Cirt (talk) 18:22, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Counterpoint
[edit]Yes it is. Bacchiad (talk) 01:09, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Perhaps it's meant as sarcasm?! --MurderByDeletionism"bang!" 22:47, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Good Work
[edit]A must read for all of us. - Ret.Prof (talk) 13:55, 8 October 2019 (UTC)