User talk:Festeeliot

Welcome!

Hi, Festeeliot. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. — kashmiri ^TALK 23:41, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

I see that important images ( in this case one particular image) had been removed. I think Wikipedia should be as informative as possible and not have to rely on hyperlinks. The edit which I undid was a minor edit in terms of scholarship, but a major edit in terms of synesthetic experience. thanks.

Your reverts

Hi, Welcome to Wikipedia. I think it is too early for you to revert other editors' edits. It's best if you stick around for a while and observe how collaborative editing is done before judging others' contributions. There was a reason for my removal of the image from Prabuddha Bharata, it's better if you contact me first before removing it when you are a new editor. Also, I'd suggest you watch out for any conflict of interest or promotion, people here are quite sensitive about it. Finally, sign any posts you make on Talk pages with four tildes (~~~~), this is always helpful to readers. Regards, — kashmiri ^TALK 23:45, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bashabi Fraser (August 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Seems not yet notable considering WorldCat only lists 363 libraries and then nothing at all as a professor, although the best claim here is the "Outstanding" of Scotland, it's all still not enough yet for accepting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bashabi Fraser and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 21:14, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Advaita Ashram

Advaita Ashram is not WP:RS. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 11:54, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

I've opened an SPI at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Festeeliot. Feel free to comment there. If you and Chattopadhyaysubhasis are two different persons, I'll help you with Draft:Bashabi Fraser. If you're the same, goodbye. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 16:01, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Relax; the coincidence wa sreally weird, but I don't mean to upset you. There's just so much weird behavior at India-related artciles; you seemed like yet another of those people. Guess I was wrong. I'd like to help you with this draft on Fraser; so, relax. All the best,

Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 18:13, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bashabi Fraser

Hello, Festeeliot. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Bashabi Fraser".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 04:27, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]