User talk:Farzam.akbarian86

December 2021

Hello, I'm Tartan357. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Hibatullah Akhundzada, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! ― Tartan357 ^Talk 08:29, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Chapek

On the article Bob Chapek, you added an unsourced date for his birthday and an image which is not free. Please find a source for the birthday if you include it again per WP:Bio, and only use freely licensed images for living people. Thanks --Elisfkc (talk) 19:28, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw the date of birth on the first page of Google Farzam.akbarian86 (talk) 05:55, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just downloaded the current photo I just uploaded from the Disney site Farzam.akbarian86 (talk) 05:57, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Neither of those things are allowed. Like I said, images need to be freely licensed and we need actual verifiable sources for information, not just what you see on Google. Elisfkc (talk) 03:24, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Farzam.akbarian86! Your additions to Bob Chapek have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 19:32, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! — Freoh 15:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of HomePod (2nd generation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on HomePod (2nd generation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Phuzion (talk) 15:43, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the second generation HomePod cannot be included in the original HomePod page because the original HomePod has been discontinued for 22 months. Farzam.akbarian86 (talk) 18:43, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, "cannot" is incorrect; when there is little to write about a topic, we generally combine pages (see WP:PAGEDECIDE). Here, there is little point in having separate pages when readers who care about the 2nd generation HomePod will find most of the information about the 1st generation relevant. DFlhb (talk) 23:03, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 20:31, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@TheManInTheBlackHat: more precisely, this was a cut-and-paste move (against a small consensus of two users, me and another, against a split), with the original article turned into a redirect. Relevant page histories: HomePod, HomePod (1st generation), HomePod (2nd generation). This is a proper mess (edit: now fixed). Farzam, bold article splits are fine, but you shouldn't try to force it through if other editors oppose; you need consensus in those cases, which you can obtain through discussion on the talk page. Also, "cut & paste moves" aren't allowed; see WP:MOVE for more information. Thanks, DFlhb (talk) 22:06, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the first generation HomePod product was discontinued 22 months ago and should not be placed on the same page Farzam.akbarian86 (talk) 06:47, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"should not" is a declaration, not an argument. Both generations match criteria 2, 4 and 5 of WP:MERGEREASON (and arguably criteria 3 as well), and therefore belong in a single article. Since you have again reverted the redirect, I'll again recommend you please read WP:CONSENSUS. Please revert your revert, and seek consensus before restoring the split, as you should under Wikipedia policies. (After two users reverted you, reinstating the "2nd generation" page constitutes edit warring.) Best, DFlhb (talk) 07:06, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:58, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Peugeot 508—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:27, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have added Creative Commons licensed text to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Peugeot 508 (2nd generation). You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly licensed sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 21:59, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Sheep (talk • he/him) 14:33, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Peugeot 508 (1st generation) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Peugeot 508 (1st generation), is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:33, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Twitter redirect

Hi! Can you please stop doing edits like this to get around the current move protection at Twitter, Inc.? There's a discussion under way on the talkpage over the future location of this page - if you think it should move to another location please seek consensus for that outcome rather than unilaterally redirecting the page. Thanks and all the best. -- Euryalus (talk) 22:17, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I suggest that you transfer Twitter, inc. to the Twitter page because this company is closed and there are the same contents on both pages. Farzam.akbarian86 (talk) 15:32, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Goro (Mortal Kombat)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Goro (Mortal Kombat), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:10, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in PlayStation, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- ferret (talk) 12:58, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Alphabet Inc.. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. InfiniteNexus (talk) 22:34, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Peugeot 508 (1st generation)

Hello, Farzam.akbarian86. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Peugeot 508 (1st generation), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:05, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello, I'm GSK. I noticed that you recently removed content from PlayStation Vita without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GSK (talk • edits) 14:56, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Peugeot 508 (2nd generation)

Hello, Farzam.akbarian86. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Peugeot 508 (2nd generation), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to State Anthem of the Soviet Union—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 19:12, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Apologies. This was a mistake on my part. Philipnelson99 (talk) 19:14, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've been warned about this before. Do not blank or redirect an article without providing a valid explanation or you are likely to be reverted. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Universal Studios, Inc., you may be blocked from editing. Do NOT remove entire pages without consensus, and do not edit war. Thank you. JeffSpaceman (talk) 14:37, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, dear friend, a company called Universal Studios inc does not exist anymore and the page is fake, and some people made this page out of personal interest. Farzam.akbarian86 (talk) 17:47, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Apple Watch into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. C F A 💬 16:29, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Persian Gulf. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]