User talk:FBIGUY81

Welcome!

Hello, FBIGUY81!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, AntiDionysius (talk) 22:43, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Talking Tom (November 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Talking Tom and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:16, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FBIGUY81! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 13:16, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Supercars of the World (November 9)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Sorry, but this isn't a viable encyclopaedia article draft. This reads like a personal blog or commentary, with content like "Ferrari LaFerrari It is a really good car. Except when someone gets the speeding ticket. The LaFerrari is an insane car. It has a good engine." Most of the content is unreferenced. And I'm not at all convinced that "Supercars of the World" is a suitable title anyway, as the scope is far too broad and/or ill-defined.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:39, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Talking Tom (November 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Talking Tom and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 22:26, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hi there: Please stop adding TV portal templates to articles. So far, you've added them to Snoopy, Mickey Mouse and Harry Potter -- none of them are known as primarily a TV character. Adding these templates is pointless busywork, please find something else to do. Toughpigs (talk) 22:55, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I've removed the Wikiproject templates from your userpage - those are only for article talk pages, since they place the page they're on into categories used by those Wikiprojects. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:20, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're getting really close to a WP:NOTHERE block here. The Portal page you made is not useful to us, and has been moved to draft. Jalen Barks (Woof) 05:02, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Talking Tom, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Paradoctor (talk) 22:57, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Talking Tom & Friends (disambiguation)

Hello FBIGUY81,

I'm CoconutOctopus, and I patrol new pages here on Wikipedia.

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged a page that you created (Talking Tom & Friends (disambiguation)) for deletion because it is unnecessary per one of the criteria at WP:G14.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|CoconutOctopus}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

CoconutOctopus talk 22:46, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]