User talk:Exorcist Z

Mark Kennedy

Strange they should have him as three on there. However over 95% of sites I can find list him as having scored four times including Wiki itself at Republic of Ireland national football team 1990s results and Republic of Ireland national football team 2000s results. Unfortunately I can't find any sort of detailed match reports of the games so if you still want to follow up on him having scored three times then perhaps the best thing I can think of is to open a discussion at WP:Football and hope someone there can help. Thanks. Kosack (talk) 11:48, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE:FAI award

Sorry mate, I can't find any information on the winners of the 2000 and 2003 awards. The players you have so far do all seem to be correct though.

The only new information I could find is that, according to this article, Alan Kelly Jr. was the winner in 1998. Sorry I couldn't help more. Kosack (talk) 14:54, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

pic, commons

The image is used with OTRS permission. The copyright holders allowed me to use their material under the CC license so there is no way I can stop you from moving it to Wikimedia Commons, regardless of my personal aversion against that project. So yes, you are free to upload it there. BanRay 01:47, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Changing username

Hello. A bureaucrat or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up as soon as possible. Thank you. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 18:50, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jose mourinho senior carrer

here is the source of the senior carrer of mourinho

http://www.zerozero.pt/jogador/jose_mourinho/actual/ficha/0/default/79732

is in portuguese sorry i cant find in english

hope that this helps you

--JozeSlb (talk) 16:33, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

sorry i dont know how to add the source im new here in wikipedia can you help me?

--JozeSlb (talk) 16:39, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

done thanks man!! --JozeSlb (talk) 16:51, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cork City

Hi there. Cork City FORAS Co-op is a brand new club set up by the supporters trust (FORAS) of Cork City Football Club which no longer exists. Technically, they are a different club but they play in the same stadium as the old club and are supported by the same fans. They also have the same sponsor and many of the same staff. Thanks for the interest. Fionnsci (talk) 15:14, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds perfect. The Derry City playing in the League of Ireland now are (like Cork City FORAS-Co-op) a different club to the Derry City playing last year. The old Derry City no longer exists. I know this is confusing because there is only one article for the two different clubs on wikipedia. I'm sorry I do not know much more about DCFC. The people here will tell you all about it [1]. Well done on all the hard work. Fionnsci (talk) 21:32, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have not found an official capacity but no more than 3,000, it's very small. Definately not 7,000. Fionnsci (talk) 15:37, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see in this photo [2] there is very little standing space. You can not stand behind the goal on the left and there is space for only maybe 100 to stand behind the goal on the right. Whatever you decide is fine. Fionnsci (talk) 18:04, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Darron Gibson

Under the Good Friday Agreement, anyone born in Northern Ireland has the right to either an Irish or British passport thus entitling Gibson or any Northern Irish football to play for either Ireland or Northern Ireland. Fionnsci (talk) 12:01, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is Glen Crowe and also I think Glen Fitzpatrick. Dalymount Park holds 7,955 but as of this year, the capacity of the Connacht Street stand [3] is reduced due to safety regulations. For this reason I do not know the allowed capacity. I think it is fine to leave it at 7,955 and yes this would make it the largest in the League of Ireland. As for Shamrock Rovers-Bohemians, there is rarely any violence but it has happened in the past. Not every game or even every year. Fionnsci (talk) 15:56, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Corners

This means that Shamrock Rovers were the winners because they had more corner kicks during the match. This was before penalty shoot-outs. Fionnsci (talk) 19:48, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tevez

What do you mean "everyone knows Tevez is not 1.73m"? How do you know this? I have two sources in front of me that both say that he is 5'8" tall. Even Manchester City's website agrees that he is 5'8". – Pee Jay 17:17, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you can ask at WT:FOOTY. – Pee Jay 18:26, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tallaght Stadium

It's not the only website to state that the capacity is 6,500 but like the others, it's almost certainly wrong. The stadium's official website goes with 6,000.[4] An anonymous user produced an email which backed this up when he/she was arguing that the west stand holds roughly 3,000. However, the user reckoned that the east stand, not constructed at the time, would hold less than the 3,000 stated in the email. The user claimed to have seen the seating plan and 5,700 was the figure he/she produced for the total capacity. This seemed and still seems like a fair estimation so it was accepted. Onetonycousins (talk) 03:17, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shamrock Rovers

I would have said it was plural and, during a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 22#Mass grammar change on team articles, another user mentions that Blackburn Rovers is plural so Shamrock would follow along the same lines. Hope this helps. Kosack (talk) 18:18, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that could mean a huge amount of changes. I'd recommend seeking a more expert opinion on the matter before making any mass changes, if you were planning too. Kosack (talk) 19:34, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Faherty/Bendtner

Hello. I'm not an admin, so I can't block them myself. Both pages are on my watchlist now, so if they persist, they can be reported to WP:AIV and see what happens then. Didn't realise how long it had been going on. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 18:05, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Disruptive editing-ownership-edit warring issues at Vinny Faherty.The discussion is about the topic Vinny Faherty. Thank you. —Struway2 (talk) 09:30, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, let's just hope it doesn't start up again. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 13:29, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the new registered editor has a similar written style to the blocked one, reinstated an old version of the Faherty article within minutes of registering, and went on to add a variety of unsourced and generally incorrect stats to other St Pat's players... Looks like a duck to me. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 10:20, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]