User talk:Ewater58

Good Job!

The edits you attempted on the American Conservatory of Music article are appropriate because they clear up the WP:NPOV and WP:VERIFIABILITY violations committed by the editors who propose the fiction that the venerable conservatory had closed in 1991. Therefore, Eurodog's latest edit should be reverted to your edit which reflects the invalidity of the attempts by the State of Illinois to interfere with the operations of a 19th century educational institution as a feeble answer to the Conservatory's well-intentioned petition for relief against the coercive tactics of the Illinois Board of Higher Education apparently designed to molest, out of their jurisdiction, that prestigious conservatory of music established in the good days of Chicago's cultural life (the latter 1800s). Rheesmusic (talk) 22:20, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Void and Specious Jurisdiction

Illinois' attempt to assert statutory jurisdiction over the Conservatory, and thus to seek relief under those statutes renders all court orders pursued under that attempt void, ab initio. This means that all Illinois Court orders entered pursuant to any attempts to provide relief under the Private College Act and the Academic Degree Act in regard to, and against a 19th century educational institution are, legally speaking, a nullity, of no force or effect, and each of them remains void from the inception of the court action. Rheesmusic (talk) 22:20, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Someone edited it again last night

Someone has altered the text again last night without leaving a note.

February 2012

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to American Conservatory of Music. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Orlady (talk) 03:02, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012 - Orlady please stop your unverifiable abuse of editing

The Conservatory never closed. Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to American Conservatory of Music. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (Ewater58 (talk) 03:23, 27 February 2012 (UTC))

Hello Ewater58. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article American Conservatory of Music, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Orlady (talk) 03:54, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Arbitration Requested

Orlady, you are requested to refrain your edition to the American Conservatory of Music page until the Arbitration process is completed. (Ewater58 (talk) 04:03, 27 February 2012 (UTC))ArbReq/G

Your recent editing history at American Conservatory of Music shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Orlady (talk) 04:30, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

edit war Orlday, you have not find out the current situation of the Conservatory and continued to delete other editors text twice within 1 hour! This is an absolute abuse of your position as Wikipedia Administrator and abuse use the administrator warning threats to me. What is in your mind? (Ewater58 (talk) 05:01, 27 February 2012 (UTC))

Your Request for Arbitration

Ewater58, I placed your request for arbitration in the correct formatting. Would you please fill in the confirmation sections. Thanks. As an Arbitration clerk, --Guerillero | My Talk 04:43, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Guerillero

Thanks Guerillero, I'll fill in the sections. (Ewater58 (talk) 04:52, 27 February 2012 (UTC))

Eurodog point 2 answered

I updated the American Conservatory of Music Talk Page with material that establishes the viability of the proposition (through verifiable sources acceptable to Wikipedia policies) that ACM has a continuity of continuous operation since the year 1886. Rheesmusic (talk) 22:56, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Eurodog

I am not familiar with the policy and logic behind Wkipedia - free information and anyone can edit. A company is treated as a legal person here in Hong Kong. There is a ACM in USA, you keep saying it "was there" but "it is here now", there are very different approach in USA. Life is a changing lesson, I am learning the flow of life all the time. Please kindly advise why it has to be your approach, your words, your way and not mine? However, I appreciate you have initiated the new article, thanks.(Ewater58 (talk) 00:59, 29 February 2012 (UTC))

Request for arbitration: American Conservatory of Music

Your request for arbitration has been declined. The Arbitration Committee rules on conduct, not on content. You are reminded not to edit war on this, or any other article. For the Arbitration Committee --Alexandr Dmitri (talk) 23:30, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Please don't use article talk pages as political bulletin boards

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:American Conservatory of Music, you may be blocked from editing. Article talk pages exist to allow discussion between contributors regarding the potential improvement of the article. They are not political bulletin boards. For this reason, your recent comments regarding your opinion of U.S. courts have been removed. --Orlady (talk) 00:23, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nusthesia (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Ewater58/Nusthesia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Ewater58/Nusthesia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:09, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Ewater58! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 12:09, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Wing Ho Wong (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James Wing Ho Wong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:James Wing Ho Wong, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:39, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

COI Inquiry

All of your editing this year has had to do with Dr. Wong and his theory of Nusthesia. Do you have a connection with them? Please read the conflict of interest policy and make any required declaration. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:42, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Nusthesia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Nusthesia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:45, 17 March 2018 (UTC)