User talk:EucalyptusTreeHugger

January 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dubai has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dubai was changed by Aitch & Aitch Aitch (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95303 on 2018-01-07T16:26:55+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:27, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dubai has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dubai was changed by Aitch & Aitch Aitch (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861453 on 2018-01-10T20:49:34+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:49, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at IPhone. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:27, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Okra (song), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Ss112 16:00, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It does not matter that hip hip is more "correct" or more common. We can't write something that isn't in the source. The source says rap. Redirects are fine to link to per WP:NOTBROKEN. Ss112 16:05, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is in the source, just uses a different name. It's not like I'm saying change it to folk or metal or some genre that is completely different from what the source says. Aitch & Aitch Aitch (talk) 16:09, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ? (XXXTentacion album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trap (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Cherry Bomb (album), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 14:44, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at ? (XXXTentacion album). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sebastian James (talk)

Using a source more than once

You don't have to unnecessary adding the same sources that is already in a article, you could just use footnotes instead (See WP:REFNAME). TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 06:33, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

While a name and birth date for Lana Rhoades are not exactly "contentious" and did not need to be removed without discussion per WP:BLP as far as I know, they do need to be sourced. IMDB is not considered to be a reliable source.

In addition, some porn stars try as much as they can to keep their real name private. I don't know if Lana is one of them, but this may be something to consider. Also, I don't think Lana will meet the notability requirements. Alexis Jazz (talk) 07:05, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 15:52, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aitch & Aitch Aitch, I have deleted the draft you created because I too felt that a brief mention at IMDB was not sufficient to trust that the real-name of the actress was "public" information. Feel free to discuss the issue at WP:BLPN or WT:PORNO, but it would be best to do so without repeating that information on-wiki, unless/till consensus is reached that it is ok to do so. Abecedare (talk) 16:52, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Lana Rhoades draft

To answer the question you asked on my talkpage: BLP policy applies everywhere on wikipedia, including draftspace, and it would not have been ok to leave the draft lying around since that could potentially harm the subject's privacy.

Given the article history (an AFD, repeated attempts to recreate an article) here is what I would suggest: work offline to gather sources and craft a stub that you think would at least establish notability and comply with WP:BLP. When ready, drop a note at either WP:BLPN or WT:PORNO asking for an experienced editor to review the draft through email and only then recreate the article in mainspace or draftspace? I'll also ping User:Ritchie333 and User:Dlohcierekim, who have been previously involved with the the article's AFD/protection, to see if they have any alternate or better ideas. Abecedare (talk) 13:55, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure I've given this advice before, but I'll repeat it - there are over 5 million articles on Wikipedia, and many of them need care and attention. I'd recommend forgetting about Lana Rhoades for a while, you could try improving a more famous near-namesake, which doesn't look too far off good article status, in my view. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:00, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can not overly emphasize the importance of Wikipedia not being perceived as defaming or libeling a subject. If the only purpose in writing an article is to dig dirt, then this is not the place for it. We must avoid tabloid journalism and salacious scandal that has not been scrupulously sourced. Further, this subject does not meet notability requirements for an encyclopedia. Much more would need to be written, in reliable sources, about this person than has been. I would recommend working to improve existing articles instead. Continued attempts at creating a libelous, poorly sourced article about a non notable subject may be considered disruptive. We must be very careful to not defame the subject.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:02, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dlohcierekim, sorry but in what way was I defaming her? The only real problem my draft had was that I used IMDb as a source for her real name which is apparently not allowed. Aitch & Aitch Aitch (talk) 12:04, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Channel Orange, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 20:36, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Illmatic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queensbridge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on ? (XXXTentacion album). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 19:29, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:51, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm User:Gab4gab. I noticed that you recently removed content from Malu Trevejo without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The content you removed is sourced and you did not provide a justification for your edit. See the talk page and discuss your viewpoint there rather than removing content with no discussion. Gab4gab (talk) 15:32, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive Editing

Your editing history (as well as your talk page) are littered with evidence of borderline edit warring, changing genres without consensus and disregarding WP:BRD. I am seeing very little evidence of engagement with other editors when your edits are challenged. Despite numerous messages and warnings on your talk page I found only a single response from you. While you have certainly made positive contributions to the project, far too often your editing has been disruptive and demonstrative of a lack of regard for consensus and your fellow editors. Given the already referenced warnings posted above this notice should be considered a Final Warning. I dislike blocking people but this looks like an ongoing issue here and it needs to stop. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:29, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ad Orientem Apologies, no disruption intended. To avoid a block, do I simply need to stop changing genres on articles? Aitch & Aitch Aitch (talk) 14:38, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is not necessary to stop editing genres. But you need to understand that genres, especially in music related articles, are often highly contentious subjects. If you are going to change genres you need to cite a WP:RS source when doing so. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:13, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Don't add citations like this in articles. Make sure you fill up the citations you added in articles (See Template:Cite web), so please adapt what you add into these. Also, it will save on time other editors who edit those pages or see them on their watchlist spend editing after you making the style consistent when you can just do it yourself. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:10, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Lana Del Rey does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! —DIYeditor (talk) 16:16, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Aitch & Aitch Aitch. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Aitch & Aitch Aitch. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cultural impact of Illmatic

Hello, Aitch & Aitch Aitch. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cultural impact of Illmatic".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:16, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Russ (rapper)

Hi, all of the sources refer to his Diemon releases as albums, they were studio produced and it does not matter that they were free on soundcloud. Sources such as Billboard call them albums and now he may call them mix-tapes to big-up his commercial releases but thats not what he's said before he was with Columbia, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 22:47, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please leave descriptive edit summaries

I see you were asked in #November 2018 about this but have not, on average, left summaries. As of just now, you have not left any summary for 85.4% of your edits; that's over 1400 edits with no indication to people with the respective pages on their watchlists, people reviewing recent changes, people reviewing page histories etc, of what you did. Every time you edit a page without leaving a descriptive edit summary, you make it it harder for other editors to understand your contributions and their effect. Please get into the habit of leaving descriptive edit summaries, and help your fellow Wikipedians. Thank you. Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 17:05, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Aitch & Aitch Aitch (talk) 18:54, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 14:54, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copying, moving, merging etc requires proper attribution

The work you are currently doing on Wu-Tang Clan and List of Wu-Tang Clan affiliates is lacking proper attribution. ~~Please stop~~ Too late apparently and read WP:COPYWITHIN, then apply appropriate fixes to the affected pages as soon as possible. Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 16:45, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how to fix it. Aitch & Aitch Aitch (talk) 16:52, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:RIA (at the bottom of WP:COPYWITHIN (which you will need to read anyway)) for how to fix the attribution. Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 16:56, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do I need to just report it to Wikipedia:Requests for history merge? Aitch & Aitch Aitch (talk) 23:35, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nope; as I said "see WP:RIA" where it says that [a]ttribution can be belatedly supplied ... using dummy edits to record new edit summaries and via talk page attribution using the {{copied}} template. Such belated attribution should make clear when the relevant text entered the page, and goes on to say that [f]or such purposes, you may use an edit summary like

NOTE: The previous edit as of 22:31, October 14, 2015‎, copied content from the Wikipedia page at [[Exact name of page copied from]]; see its history for attribution

. Suggested edit summaries for various repair contexts are provided at Help:Dummy edit. I already fixed the attribution after one of your copies; see this edit to Wu-Tang Clan and on the relevant talk pages here and here; you should be able to figure it out from these examples – just don't do anything if you're not sure what you should be doing. Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 00:03, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed it for you. Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 06:21, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Aitch & Aitch Aitch (talk) 21:37, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Lydon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Flowers of Romance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:22, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tyler, the Creator, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brockhampton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:26, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Russ

When the Diemon releases were made they were called albums in reliable sources. If you like Russ perhaps you could write an article on his Zoo album as it qualifies for an article having charted and been reviewed, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 18:43, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Atlantic306: And within the past two years or so,The Breakfast Club and Genius, and Russ himself have referred to them as mixtapes. It makes more sense too considering the fact that there doesn't seem to be any physical releases of them and they were made available for free on SoundCloud. As for the Zoo album article, I'm thinking of getting round to it. Aitch & Aitch Aitch (talk) 18:49, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

- When they were released they were called albums by Russ and in reliable sources such as Billboard so should be called albums. Calling them mixtapes now is a marketing ploy to big-up the non-free Columbia releases. There are record companies that do no physical release at all, but they still release albums. Atlantic306 (talk) 19:39, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zoo (Russ album) has been accepted

Zoo (Russ album), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Atlantic306 (talk) 20:37, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template

When someone removes the template as was the case at List of Hip hop Albums Considered to be Influential, please don't add it back as per this. Thanks. Rob van vee 11:28, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Willing to accept

I have successfully requested the unsalting of Belle Delphine, pursuant to your draft that is coming along. The youtube sources need to be removed and replaced with high quality secondary sourcing, the article spruced up a bit, and then I would be willing to accept it.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Belle Delphine has been accepted

Belle Delphine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Tutelary (talk) 01:08, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tyler, the Creator, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Rob van vee 05:59, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mike Skinner (musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Midlands (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mac Miller

You were asked not to make changes again without using the talk page section on that item, but you ignored that. Not a good idea. You are also edit warring, which a very bad idea. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 08:14, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SergeWoodzing: Like I said, is there any valid reason to not include a sentence about his death in the lead? Aitch & Aitch Aitch (talk) 14:37, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you would have used the talk page, you would have seen the guideline I quoted there. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 09:43, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SergeWoodzing: MOS:LEADBIO? The one that states "a single sentence describing the death is usually sufficient"? Like I said, is there any valid reason to not include a sentence about his death in the lead? Aitch & Aitch Aitch (talk) 11:14, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rico Recklezz

Hello, Aitch & Aitch Aitch. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rico Recklezz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 01:38, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

50,000 Destubbing Challenge Focus of the Week

Hello there. This is an invitation to join the 50,000 Destubbing Challenge Focus of the Week. £250 (c. $310) up for grabs in May, June and July with £20 worth of prizes to give away every week for most articles destubbed. Each week there is a different region of focus, though half the prize will still be rewarded for articles on any subject. Sign up if you want to contribute at least one of the weeks or support the idea! † Encyclopædius 19:13, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of hip hop albums considered the best

Hello, Aitch & Aitch Aitch. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of hip hop albums considered the best".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Techie3 (talk) 11:06, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Shake the Snow Globe

Hello, Aitch & Aitch Aitch. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shake the Snow Globe".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 01:04, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pharrell Williams

So, you have edited the article over 150 times in the last 3 weeks, yet you have no intention to add sources that can be easily found elsewhere? (CC) Tbhotch^™ 16:51, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Tbhotch: I'm just going through the article attempting to clean it up. I feel like I've done a half decent job at sorting out the "Early life" and "1992-2004: The Neptunes and N.E.R.D." sections especially. This article was (and still is) full of unsourced/poorly written crap, and I've never extensively edited an article of this size before, so apologies for being slow. Maybe you can help by adding the "easily found" sources. Aitch & Aitch Aitch (talk) 17:04, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's impossible if you don't finish "copyediting" it first, you know, edit conflicts. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 17:53, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I must admit that it was to hard to find sources for his Oscar nomination, though. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 18:58, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edit?

Hi! You flagged several recent edits to the Silk Road (marketplace) article as minor; the edits are fine, but most don't meet the "Minor" edit criteria (from WP:MINOR):

A check to the minor edit box signifies that only superficial differences exist between the current and previous versions. Examples include typographical corrections, corrections of minor formatting errors, and reversion of obvious vandalism. A minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. [...]
By contrast, a major edit is one that should be reviewed for its acceptability to all concerned editors. Any change that affects the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it concerns a single word; for example, the addition or removal of "not" is not a minor edit.

Personally, I avoid using the Minor flag unless I'm absolutely sure the label fits (correcting a typo, undoing obvious vandalism, etc.). Cheers! — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 17:12, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook–Cambridge Analytica data scandal

There are issues with your last copy edit of the Facebook–Cambridge Analytica data scandal. Please remember to review your edits. Viriditas (talk) 20:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ayla Tesler-Mabe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ayla Tesler-Mabe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayla Tesler-Mabe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PK650 (talk) 05:30, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Lana Rhoades

Draft:Lana Rhoades, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Lana Rhoades and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Lana Rhoades during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:40, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Shearonink

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Bath School disaster § Kehoe as a "psychopath" re: motive in infobox. Shearonink (talk) 21:53, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comments in computer program

Please participate in this discussion: Talk:Computer_program#Request_for_comments_on_downgrade_to_Class=C. Timhowardriley (talk) 18:48, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]