You can copy and place {{helpme}} with your accompanying question on the bottom of your talk page and someone else will show up shortly to answer your questions here.
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
Hello, Errant1905!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bobby Cohn (talk) 15:40, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I believe you were the user with the most contributions to the draft for this page. It turns out that a mistake has been made the last time the draft submission was rejected, as the user making the check did not realise that the leftcom website where much of the article's content was taken from is already licensed under CC BY 3.0. This means that you can actually use text from that source, but you must attribute it otherwise it will still fall under copyright infringement.
You can read more about that here. This means that you can bring the removed content back to the draft, but you must make sure it is attributed with the appropriate license otherwise it will be rejected and/or removed again. Just thought you might want to know, if you are still interested in the subject. All the best.
--Pitsarotta (talk) 11:32, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
