User talk:Epeefleche/Archive 5

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

List of people from Colorado

Hello. Thank you for your help in editing the "List of people from Colorado" article. I noticed that you have added Anwar al-Awlaki to the list. The subject's connection to Colorado strictly is due to studying at Colorado State University. For consistency, I think it is important that the subjects have a minimum connection to the state. If not, it could open the door to editors adding superfluous subjects to the list, such as athletes who briefly played for professional sports teams in Colorado, or who also only studied in Colorado. I reviewed other persons on the article and did not find others listed whose only connection to Colorado is strictly through studying at the school. When you have a chance, would you please let me know roughly how many other persons have been added to the list who have a similar or less of a connection to the state? Thank you.Djrun (talk) 15:49, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

I have edited hundreds of similar lists. They are of people who have lived in the state. He lived in the state, for years. We reflect people who have been born in a state, and moved out before they were a year old. Plus -- in his case in particular, the fact that he was a US citizen, though he did not live his entire life in the US, was very important, and served as the basis for a federal lawsuit. All of this, including his living in the state, is covered by RSs. --Epeefleche (talk) 22:05, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Edit conflict deletion of RS-sourced text

Hi. I checked the diffs and found this damning one, in which the following text:

Soofi was raised as a Muslim by his father.<ref>[http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-32582704]</ref> When his parents divorced, he and his brother moved to Pakistan to live with their father and stepmother,, and then later from Pakistan to the US in 1998 to live with his mother.<ref name="hollyyan,cnn"/><ref>[http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-32582704]</ref> In the 1990s, Soofi attended a private school in [[Islamabad]], Pakistan.<ref name="hollyyan,cnn"/>

was removed. I would never intentionally remove important text like that. I think I had copied and pasted my version when I hit an edit conflict, checked the last edit and misviewed only minor edits, and updated my text. Sorry. Quis separabit? 18:59, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

No worries at all. Fast-moving article, so I can understand how that could happen unintentionally. All the best. BTW - if you want to move this thread to the one where it started, including my comment, that would be fine with me. Others could then more easily follow it. Best. Epeefleche (talk) 19:02, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Citing sources

Hello Epeefleche: I notice that you are kindly helping with edits on the Jewish-Palestinian Living Room Dialogue Page. I am a new editor and appreciate your contribution to improving the page. I noticed that some citations were needed so I added citations 14, 15, and 16. If those are not appropriate, please let me know. For the citations related to the Foundation for Global Community and the Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center, you have to page down a ways on both pages to get to the actual mention of the Dialogue Group. Should I have noted that in the citation, or just assume that people will find it on their own? Thank you Unicorn46 (talk) 00:42, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

• My pleasure. A starting point for you would be reading Wikipedia:Citing sources, Wikipedia:Inline citation, and Help:Referencing for beginners, and related pages. Plus -- I would stop initial capping the non-defined-term Dialogue Group. We don't initial cap a term, that is not part of the name, and is not a defined term. Epeefleche (talk) 04:00, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello Epeefleche: OK, thank you for this advice. I will do all you have suggested. I also changed the citation that you asked me to revert. I hope that the new reference that I chose is appropriate. Unicorn46 (talk) 07:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

LST Response

Hi Epeefleche. Thank you for the comment on my talk page. I recognize the need to stay neutral, which is why I did not edit the page. I only wanted to provide my account and additional relevant facts for Wikipedia editors to consider. Please let me know if you have any questions. Kyle McEntee (talk) 02:12, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Understood. I didn't think you did anything wrong; only wanted you to be aware of the rules. Epeefleche (talk) 02:28, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Just an FYI. The person using "Unemployed_Northeastern" is impersonating a person who uses that handle on the Chronicle of Higher Education, Above the Law, TaxProf, The Atlantic, Slate, and other sites that use Livefyre and Disqus. I know they are not the same person because I know the person being impersonated and asked him specifically if he used that handle on Wikipedia. I tell you this because you mentioned that a checkuser could be appropriate. Additionally, the user Arxiloxos pointed out that the following person "heavily edited" the LST article: S.J.HarperBelly. Steven J Harper is a former law partner at a major firm in Chicago (Kirkland & Ellis), author on the legal profession and legal education, and is frequently quoted in the legal and traditional press. However, these edits were not by him. I have an ongoing relationship with the real Steven J Harper and know it is not him. Finally, although I think the reliability discussion is trending in LST's favor, I do want to alert you to several indicators of our reliability. One example is the New Yorker saying "For a full view of the depressing facts, see the superb Law School Transparency Web site." Another example is a list of the traditional and legal publications that cite LST. Another is a list of our publications and speaking engagements. Another is a list of awards. Based on writing style, phrase choices, previous statements, and other factors, I am fairly certain of who the person behind these two accounts is. However, I do not know if it is appropriate to make an allegation like that. Please advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyle McEntee (talk • contribs) 01:57, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Reply to your comment elsewhere

Just to keep chit chat off a blocked editor's page (I don't know what's going on, so I don't know what would cause unintentional offense and what wouldn't), I'll reply here. I doubt I'm more of an expert than you, since I know almost nothing about scripts/bots/AWB and other magic. But from what little I know, I think it's a reasonable guess; all that was happening was adding a message to an AFD that it had been listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Baseball, and then listing that page there. I can imagine a setup where a script/bot/AWB/magic usually does that if a page is both (a) in Category:baseball and (b) listed at AFD, but something went wrong and it started doing that to every page at AFD. Or, I could easily be wrong. But it seems more likely that him doing it intentionally, and doing it really, really fast for nearly a half an hour. --Floquenbeam (talk) 13:31, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Perhaps a super-wonk (such as the one who determined that it was not that his PC had been compromised, who posted on that page) will weigh in and educate both of us. Or perhaps he will weigh in, and explain not just what happened, but why it was followed 21 minutes later by him retiring. I'm all ears. Best. --Epeefleche (talk) 13:41, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Mystery solved. Not a script gone mad. But rather intentional vandalism. As the now-indef-blocked editor wrote: "vandalism ... to see how long I could get away with it." Suicide-by-sysop. Epeefleche (talk) 22:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

possible AFD?

• You prodded Ahmed Shawki (socialist) just over a year ago. Still no sources. I looked and found nothing more RS than socialist worker online.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:38, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

• Possible. Do me a favor and ping me if you nominate it. Tx. Epeefleche (talk) 19:39, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

I did (nominate it).E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:26, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

And ... it's gone. Nice cleanup. --Epeefleche (talk) 03:04, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The forward.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The forward.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:13, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi Epeefleche. The Forward recently changed their logo, so I uploaded the new logo to File:The Forward logo.png and "orphaned" the old version, which you uploaded. Nothing personal. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:32, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Perfect. Well done. Kudos. Epeefleche (talk) 06:07, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

You need to assume good faith

You reverted my edit, where I just added a placeholder for a drugstore chain, and called it vandalism. My edit did not meet any definition of vandalism. I suggest you read up on wp:Assume good faith.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.156.84.229 (talk • contribs) 06:42, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Epeefleche: I have reported IP editor 205.156.84.229 for vandalism. See here: Admin Noticeboard on vandalism.--ML (talk) 13:10, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

@IP -- assuming good faith does not mean "ignore wp:burden". @ML-Thanks. --Epeefleche (talk) 17:42, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

And ... now, after further scrutiny, the entire article has been deleted at AfD. --Epeefleche (talk) 23:40, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Disclosure of possible off Wiki coordination and possible receipt of improper payments

If you wish to continue to be involved in the Law School Transparency Discussion, please disclose whether or not you have ever accepted payment or entered any raffle for payment from TLS, LST, Spivey consulting or any related parties. The discussions you have critiqued noted that many wikipedia editors have been compromised by off Wiki-coordination and payments. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam#Undisclosed_Paid_Editing_and_off-Wiki_CoordinationUnemployed Northeastern (talk) 00:51, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

• I actually don't have a problem with the question. The answer is no. But I do have a problem with your trollish behavior. And your tone (seriously ... "if you wish to ... where do you come off with that? ... how juvenile an effort to act the role of little-man-in-charge where you have no power of enforcement is that"). And with the fact that you have not indicated: a) whether you have ever edited under another username or IP address on Wikipedia; and b) whether you have a conflict of interest, as defined by Wikipedia, in that you have an interest vis-a-vis Brian Leiter publications? --Epeefleche (talk) 00:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

While I do find Brian Leiter's publications interesting to read, I have no financial interest in his publications. Your attacks on Brian Leiter are off topic on the question of whether LST is a reliable source, and your retaliatory edits to his wikipedia page and ad-hominem attacks against anyone questioning LST are inappropriate.Unemployed Northeastern (talk) 01:38, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

• I'm talking about the Brian Leiter who fell from grace, when he was was forced out from his position as editor of one of the publications, and disgraced, because over 600 Philosophy professors demanded that he be forced out, so dim was their view of him. Following what in Wikipedia terms we would call, among other things, inappropriate personal attacks and threats of litigation. We at WP also force people out for that sort of behavior, when it is at the level he engaged in. You still -- even after I answered your questions -- have failed completely to answer my two questions.

One -- Have ever edited under another username or IP address on Wikipedia?

Two-- Do you have a conflict of interest, as defined by Wikipedia, in that you have an interest vis-a-vis Brian Leiter publications, or (let's expand it, since you seem to be wikilawyering) vis-a-vis Brian Leiter (whose praises you keep on singing on WP pages)?

Don't be an ethic-less editor. You asked me a question, even though you hadn't responded to mine. I answered. Now, even though you won the game of "you go first" -- act ethically and answer the two questions. Truthfully.

It is very odd that you suddenly appeared, edited hundreds of times, and landed on all manner of noticeboards, and are not being honest and forthright enough to answer these two simple questions. While demanding that your questions be answered. Epeefleche (talk) 04:00, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

I agree, having reviewed your edits. Epeefleche has been quite fair, and his term "odd" regarding your editing is putting it mildly. Given your bullying tone, I'd say "suspicious" might be more apt. I strongly suggest that you answer the questions put to you. And for the record I have no idea what the issues are here, never having edited on these articles or even, to my recollection, the topic of law schools. Jusdafax 04:24, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

On a purely administrative level, I have some concerns about the editing behaviour of Unemployed Northeastern. I would not say he/she has the trappings of a sock puppet, rather a WP:SPA who is used to arguing on the basis of policy/regulations. Given that he/she has taken umbrage against an organisation that deals with the legal profession, this is not particularly surprising. Given that he/she has quoted WP:COI above, we can assume that he/she is aware of the guidelines given in Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#Dealing with single-purpose accounts.

My personal approach would be to ask for advice on WP:AN/I. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 11:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Tx. As I half-suspected, once the Memorial Weekend was over, the turbo-charged "newbie" SPA editor disappeared (under that name). If not fishy, certainly Duck-ish. --Epeefleche (talk) 23:40, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

List of University of Westminster alumni

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Poltair (talk) 13:00, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

• Tx. The indef blocks seem to be an appropriate result. Some editors just don't heed warnings. Epeefleche (talk) 23:40, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Unused parms in infobox

As near as I can tell, you have no consensus or policy basis for reverting my edits to Bryce Alford. The OPTIONAL parms in question will not be used for at least a year (more likely two). Removing them has no impact to the reader and potentially stops easy vandalism or good-faith misuse in the meantime. It is very common across Wikipedia for non-applicable parms (which these are for a college player) to be removed - in basketball we do it for draft fields, statistical fields, career end date, etc. In other words, there is zero harm and some good done by this action. Your note "why create more work later" is a non-issue - when a player completes their college eligibility there are other changes (remove current college and conference info, close tenure in college field, update leads etc) that are made and this is handled every year by the basketball wiki projects. Adding a few more fields adds about 5 seconds for maintenance that is necessary anyway. Given that you have no more backing than I do, I am restoring my edits, which puts you at the precipice of WP:3RR. If you'd like to pursue some policy or consensus that mandates keeping parms that aren't needed, then feel free to start that discussion at the appropriate place and please do inform me as I would be happy to take part in such a good-faith discussion. Right now, I am just having trouble figuring out why such a minor change has made you feel the need to edit war over it. Also, you re-added a deprecated parm ("team_link") in the process, please do not do this again. Rikster2 (talk) 12:02, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Nimrod Mashiah

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:57, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 16 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Shahawar Matin Siraj page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Marharyta Dorozhon

Thanks for supporting the DYK Project Victuallers (talk) 02:42, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Swathe of edits

Hello Epeefleche, how are you? I have edited about half a dozen articles in which you were involved in over the past half an hour or so and I just wanted to thank you for all the hard work you have put into these. Cheers and I hope you're well. —  Cliftonian (talk)  12:16, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Jon Moscot

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:31, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Ali Marpet

Hello! Your submission of Ali Marpet at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Dravecky (talk) 01:20, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Hanna Knyazyeva-Minenko

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:20, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Congregation Albert

Hello! Your submission of Congregation Albert at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 15:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Please see new note on DYK nomination template. Yoninah (talk) 19:13, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Marc Hinawi

Hello! Your submission of Marc Hinawi at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BabelStone (talk) 12:58, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Marc Hinawi

Actually, I found those newspaper sources through the Hebrew Wikipedia. Here are a few I found on the Hebrew Google:

• "from an Arab-Christian family"
• "an Israeli Arab medal winner"

Best, Yoninah (talk) 22:27, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Congregation Albert

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:20, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Ziv Kalontarov

Materialscientist (talk) 01:12, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Ilana Kratysh

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:22, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Marc Hinawi

Hello! Your submission of Marc Hinawi at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 14:30, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Sagi Muki

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:18, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Marc Hinawi

Gatoclass (talk) 00:11, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Alex Bregman

The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Ali Marpet

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:02, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Recent years RFC

As an editor involved in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Recent years, I wanted to make sure you saw the RFC that I placed there regarding the guidelines. Your comments are of course appreciated. agtx 19:26, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mohammed al-Hanooti

The article Mohammed al-Hanooti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Cleric of apparently only local importance; no indication of notability in article or found online.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TJRC (talk) 22:11, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Or Sasson

Hello! Your submission at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BenLinus1214^talk 01:55, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Epeefleche, additional issues have arisen on the nomination page. Please stop by there as soon as possible. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:16, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Ankaralı Namık

Last year you PRODded this, and it was deleted. Undeletion has been requested at WP:REFUND, so per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider AfD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:07, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Jenkins (name)

Hello,

You placed a maintenance tag for lack of cites on Jenkins (name) in June 2015. I worked on adding citations. Please review for tag removal. If more cites are needed please advise. Jrcrin001 (talk) 16:07, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Requested move

Hi, I've started a discussion at Talk:Westfield Derby about moving articles to "Intu" X and I'm only notifying you as you participated in a previous move,
BTW sorry if you got a ping earlier - Something went wrong so figured I'd just post this to everyone instead, Fun times! ,
Anyway thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 23:27, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Canadian Jewish News logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Canadian Jewish News logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hadassah Neurim

It seems the CBS now considers this a place (it was included in the 2014 population statistics), so I've started an article. I recall that you were asking about this, so you may want to link to it or expand. Cheers, Number 57 22:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

AN/I discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an editor for whom you left a talk page caution.[1] The thread is Professor JR on political articles. Thank you. - Wikidemon (talk) 10:45, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Southampton Bath & Tennis Club

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Southampton Bath & Tennis Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 02:10, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Savvyjack23 (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Savvyjack23 (talk) 07:41, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Leiter

Appreciate your efforts to thwart Brian Leiter from writing his own Wiki article... alas, the thing still reads like a panegyric (even the section on "the controversy" makes it seem as though last year's scandal was about the analytic bias of PGR, rather than Leiter's abuse of power—Ichikawa is not even mentioned)... but at any rate, keep fighting the good fight.

Cheers, 151.42.151.163 (talk) 23:38, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shaun Smith (baseball)

The article Shaun Smith (baseball) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBASEBALL – has not played or coached in a major league or a major international competition. Also fails the WP:GNG, particularly WP:SIGCOV (none of the independent sources specifically deal with Smith, only mention him in passing). The article also suggests Smith coached in "Sydney Major League", which does not exist (and is certainly not "the highest level of baseball in Australia").

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. IgnorantArmies (talk) 14:44, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Shorouk_Academy

delete accident from this article because this article for education and look at arabic version and make english version like it.thanks.--Mohamed1900q (talk) 22:40, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Musical Mutual Protective Union) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Musical Mutual Protective Union, Epeefleche!

Wikipedia editor Carriearchdale just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great article. Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment on Carriearchdale's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nomination of Sherry Wolf (activist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sherry Wolf (activist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherry Wolf (activist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Wikiclaus' cheer !

		Wikiclaus greetings
		Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you the happiest of Wikiclaus' Wikipedian good cheer. This message is intended to celebrate the holiday season, promote WikiCheer, and to hopefully make your day just a little bit better, for Wikiclaus encourages us all to spread smiles, fellowship, and seasonal good cheer by wishing others a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings and the happiest of holiday spirits from Wikiclaus !

Category:Gluten-free restaurants has been nominated for discussion

Category:Gluten-free restaurants, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:43, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Ralph DeLoach listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ralph DeLoach. Since you had some involvement with the Ralph DeLoach redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 03:38, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Help me Zeek Article better

Hi Epeefleche, I have been following your edits for a while now and I would like to ask you for help with Zeek Wikipedia article. Zeek is an award-winning Israeli start-up with a wide variety of notable references.Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eddard 'Ned' Stark (talk • contribs) 16:24, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Precious

notable lists

Thank you, tirelessly working editor, for quality articles such as Miriam Roth, for reserving lists of people to the notable, for coming to the rescue of articles, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:57, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

A year ago, you were the 665th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:09, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Three years ago, you were recipient no. 665 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:06, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aqua Grill

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aqua Grill, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 03:42, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Jamaliya Syed Khaleel Awn Moulana for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jamaliya Syed Khaleel Awn Moulana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamaliya Syed Khaleel Awn Moulana until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

I've left this notification because you were the nominator of this article (created under a different name) in its previous AfD, and it looks like the same concerns apply to the article in its new incarnation.PohranicniStraze (talk) 20:20, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Arazi (comapny) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Arazi (comapny). Since you had some involvement with the Arazi (comapny) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. feminist 15:34, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Precious four years!

Precious

Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:18, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ICMEC logo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ICMEC logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jweeklylogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jweeklylogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jewish News of Greater Phoenix.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jewish News of Greater Phoenix.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Invite

Hello! I thought you might be interested in joining the Gun Politics Task Force. We work on coordinating, expanding and improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics broadly related to governmental regulation of firearm ownership. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Project Page. Thank You!

207.106.112.114 (talk) 22:44, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Five years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:51, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

July 2018

Please stop assuming ownership of articles. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive, and is a violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Biglulu (talk) 08:32, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

This warning doesn't make much sense considering User:Epeefleche has not made any edits since 2015. -- œ^™ 05:14, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Citibank, North America listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Citibank, North America. Since you had some involvement with the Citibank, North America redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:13, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Abelhaleem Hasan Abdelraziq Ashqar

The article Abelhaleem Hasan Abdelraziq Ashqar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability based entirely on WP:BLPCRIME. No other indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 09:38, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Abelhaleem Hasan Abdelraziq Ashqar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abelhaleem Hasan Abdelraziq Ashqar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abelhaleem Hasan Abdelraziq Ashqar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 00:01, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Martin Heidegger

There is a discussion underway on the Martin Heidegger talk page that may be of interest to you. Sbelknap (talk) 22:43, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:24, 17 November 2020 (UTC)