User talk:Eol28

Welcome!

Hello, Eol28, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Wales national rugby union team may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:02, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wales national rugby union team

Please stop adding Shane Williams' tries for the Lions to the infobox at Wales national rugby union team. They have absolutely nothing to do with his tries for Wales and should not have any bearing on that article. – Pee Jay 15:35, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article is about the Wales team, not the Lions. There is absolutely no connection between his tries for Wales and for the Lions. Stop or I will report you for disruptive editing. – Pee Jay 17:12, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You clearly don't get this. The field indicates who the top try-scorer is for Wales. Shane Williams has scored 58 tries for Wales (and two for the Lions, making a total of 60); if another player had scored 57 for Wales and four for the Lions (making a total of 61), Williams would still be the top try-scorer for Wales. Therefore, the Lions tries are irrelevant to the infobox field. – Pee Jay 17:22, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is not relevant. What do his Lions tries have to do with the Wales national team? That information belongs on the Shane Williams page and on articles relating to the Lions, not on the Wales page. – Pee Jay 17:28, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I would like to direct your attention to WP:BRD, which states that Wikipedia has a clear editing cycle: Bold, Revert, Discuss. You were bold in making your original edit, I reverted it, now we leave the article as it was before your bold edit and discuss the contribution. Please leave the article as it was. – Pee Jay 17:31, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The damage it does is that it introduces information that does not need to be included. It implies that the reason Williams is the top try-scorer for Wales is because his Lions tries give him more than another player. This is unnecessary and confusing for people who are reading the article as newcomers to the subject. – Pee Jay 17:40, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you think there are no newcomers reading that article, I think you have sorely missed the point of Wikipedia. I advise you to familiarise yourself with the site's guidelines and policies before contributing further. – Pee Jay 17:52, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can see why you would think that – scoring the number of tries that Williams has done is quite a feat. However, he only scored 58 tries for Wales and to add to that info in the infobox (which is only meant to be a brief summary of the total information included in the article) introduces unnecessary complications. Oh, and your compromise really only made things worse, sorry. – Pee Jay 18:03, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to know why I'm doing this. All you need to know is that I found your contributions to have an overall negative effect on the encyclopaedia. If you don't want to contribute any more, that's fine, but you could at least take my advice and learn how to be a positive contributor. – Pee Jay 18:10, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you should do it, except with your own words this time instead of copying the text off his Scarlets profile. – Pee Jay 18:14, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you did discuss it, but you also continued to make edits that I had already told you were negative. Furthermore, discussion does not necessarily mean you will get your own way. – Pee Jay 18:16, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, you've been here two days, whereas I've been doing this for just over eight years. If I find fault with your contributions, chances are I have a good reason. And although you might not see it now, my interactions with you have been positive, in that I hope they will make you a better editor. Cheers. Bye. – Pee Jay 18:35, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should concern yourself less with what contributions I make and more with what contributions you make. I had to make the changes to the Jordan Williams article because it was in an absolute state, and your changes weren't helping (see the warning I gave you below). – Pee Jay 20:04, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:01, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello Eol28, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Jordan Williams (rugby union) has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Pee Jay 12:30, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot

Hi Eol28! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]