User talk:Enlightened one088

References

Please use high quality references per WP:MEDRS such as review articles or major textbooks. Note that review articles are NOT the same as peer reviewed articles. A good place to find medical sources is TRIP database Thanks.

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 01:45, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Again, as Doc said, please pay attention to WP:MEDRS, the sourcing guideline for biomedical content. And please take care not to wildly misrepresent the source. Also, do not try to use advocacy groups' activism websites as sources. Zad68 02:37, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Circumcision. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

You can't just simply revert the content back in. Please read and adhere to the WP:MEDRS guidelines. Zad68 03:23, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 04:47, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On Wikipedia you cannot just force your preferred content in. The only way to save yourself from a very probable block is to revert yourself and make your case here: Talk:Circumcision#Primary_sources --NeilN ^{talk to me} 05:09, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Circumcision

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Circumcision. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:Enlightened one088 reported by User:Jmh649 (Result: Blocked). EdJohnston (talk) 05:43, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]